First Things First: The Physics of Causality

Steve,

It am not my idea. I did not exist millions of years ago. Only eternal infinite visible surface has ever existed.

Joe Fisher, Extremely Patient Realist

Joe,so lol you speak to God or it has send you this information lol ? DEVELOP!!! if you cannot ,stop to repeat please it is irritating for the blogers of FQXi,really Joe.Friendly

In Darwinism/Weismannism there is no first cause, just a causal chain. Well, all we entruists may hope and fight for global social consciousness including awareness of the unavoidability for the sake of humanity to control births and restrict consumption.

You Steve and typical Americans seem to share the overly optimistic belief of trusting in God creationists that there are no problems which cannot be solved: eat the putatively sweet cake and have it though.

July 29th was the international day after which the consumption already exceeded a declared for sustainable value in 2019. While the USA is blamed to be leading with 16.2 tons annually emitted carbondioxide per person, the values 8.7 for Germany and 7.4 for China are also irresponsibly high.

Reportedly, the 10 million city of Moscow already faces serious problems to dispose its waste, and now it plans to transport it 1,200 km far away. Is this a solution for good?

Worldwide the cities are getting larger and larger. The capital of China will perhaps be the first one in excess of 100 Million inhabitats.

Eckard Blumschein

Hi Eckard,you seems persuaded by your Words and thoughts.I don t understand how it is possible,really.I must insist on this too,don t take my for a creationist please,my theory of spherisation has nothing to do with these riligious things,so please respect this and my deterministic researchs.I repeat all the pat relevant thinkers like Einstein,Tesla,Maxwell,Galilei,Planck,Lorentz,Newton,Dirac,and so more conisdered this infinite potential with DETERMINISM,are you conscious of this? you study the works of theser thinkers but you don t encircle the real meaning of their thoughts about matters energy transformations.How is it possible for a generalist? In fact you are too much focus on economy,you forget to insert these universal parameters simply showing us the truths about the real possible harmonisation and points of equilibrium.Forget your chains and insert this infinite potential Eckard you shall see these solutions so simple generally speaking,really.Forget too these economocal numbers,you know the econonomy can be harmonised too when we insert this said universal altruism for the governances.The problem I repeat is this lack of global consciousness for the high spheres of power and the responsabilities of the richest.Take care,we can discuss hours but the most important for me is to show you these truths and maybe to convice you in changing your points of vue.Friendly

Joe,do you understand that the universe is finite like our series of particles coded and that we have constants and infinities too inside this physicality like tools ,and now philosophically speaking ,above ,beyond this physicality we have an infinite eternal consciousness and this infinity created this fionite physicality in sending codes ,informations to build this universe? so all what you tell us need details simply,we don t need courses about what is this infinity,the infinities like pi or others and the finite systems coded,DEVELOP PLEASE

Steve,

Darwin contradicted to the view of Parmenides, ..., and Einstein by considering life material but "consciousness an epiphenomenon", cf.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(08)61884-X/fulltext

"Darwin pioneered the materialistic approach to history--like Marx".

"darwinism provides a framework in which science is done. Since no framework is infinite, by definition, no framework is complete"

Hello Eckard, thanks for sharing the link.

The philosophy is a complex topic and these thinkers were relevant.It is in fact not easy to see clear in all this puzzle about the human psychology,the determinism,the consciousness.We have so many parameters to take into account,the education,the Environments,the encodings,the psychology,the freewill,the deterministic Learnings,the consciousness,the intelligence,the minds,the genetic,the evolution,this and that...complex is a weak Word lol Darwin maybe has forgotten that consciousness evolves and so that competition considering this evolution can be harmonised towards the synergies and this foundamebtal complementarity between Lifes,so we return at this opening to our universe where we don t lack öatters,space,energy.We cannot consider only this finite sphere Earth if I can say knowing our potential.Friendly

Steve,

What was a visible surface called 25 million years ago? Oh, that's right, there was nobody around 25 million years ago to call anything.

Joe Fisher, Literate Realist

Joe, study a Little bit the evolution of this Earth,we have bones analysed with the carbon 14,we know the age of the Earth and its evolution in billions and millions years ,so please explain me what you mean because really I don t understand nothing.

Be sure Joe ,you are not realist you know,you told us things that nobody understands in fact,You speak about a surface ,after about 25 millions years ago that there were nobody to call ??? it is odd really and at all levels of analyses,mathematically,physically,philosophically.If you d develop or explain with Concrete deterministic details,we could discuss seriously but no,you repeat things totally incomprehensible,really Joe,me I tell you this for you and your credibility,it is really very odd Joe.

Steve,

As mandatory precondition of my promotion almost half a century ago, I had to learn a bit of English which proved very valuable to me and to study Marxist philosophy which made me curious. A lexicon of philosophy led me to what seems to you a huge amount of mutual contradictions. Meanwhile, I distrust in monisms, creationism, and the like. Future data are not measurable in advance, Following Descartes, Fourier still failed to restrict his analyse to integration just over the past. Heaviside introduced the trick that has been fooling us up to now.

When will physicists accept a Popperian open World?

Will humanity in time include the insight that educated people are obliged by their own reason to stop consumption and unlimited growth of population?

Objections?

Eckard Blumschein

Eckard,Like I said I respect your philosophical analyses.I agree with some points of vue about the creationism mainly. But I insist about the fact that we can have faith and be superdeterministic about these universal laws,axioms,algorythms.Marx was a relevant thinker but he was a past thinker and at this present we have others parameters to take into account.For me you know the money,arms and weapons and borders are things totally dedicated to disappear,but at this moment we are obliged to consider these parameters like the economy.About this global economical system I beleive strongly that it is this consciousness wich is important in the governances and so the capitalism and this socialism can be harmonised and can reach the points of equilibrium for the well of all considering this altruistic consciousness.Of course the superconsumption is stupid like the opulence ,the materialism or others.It is still just due to a lack of consciousness and maybe education,this universal education shows us truths about this space,these matters disponible and the energy.I don t agree with the limitation of births,it is not an universal parameter.But considering our actual global system I can understand your ideas about these problems.But we can solve Eckard,we have the solutions to do it like I have explained you.All conscious person understands that we have serious global problems and that we must take quickly our responsabilities.The real question is "but what do the high spheres of power"??? are we governed by unconscious? or is it a problem of corruption and fear? or due to a lack of skillings? ...In all case it is odd ,this planet needs to be reassured in fact and we must act generally speaking in correlation with these said universal truths.Friendly

Eckard,

One Objection. Don't blame Fourier: his original series is always integrated over an interval of finite length. Furthermore, that interval is purely mathematical and has, in and of itself, no physical significance, such as referring to either an interval of "space" or an interval of "time". The later must be introduced as a premise, in physics, not math, which in effect, declares that the math is sufficient to accurately represent, whatever the physicist has assumed that it is supposed to be representing, about the real, physical world. The difficulties that you are pointing-out, all arise when the intervals are extended to infinity, and exotic mathematical notions, such as imaginary numbers, are introduced, and the physicist (not the mathematician) is then required to also specify, by premise, exactly what such things are supposed to be representing, in the real world, as opposed to some idealistic vision of the real world.

The devil is in the details - and the premises.

Rob McEachern

Eckard,

"You referred to..."

I was referring only to my final comments (in my browser, my link goes directly to my final comments, rather than the top of the web-page) in which I stated "the Fourier analysis will simply and automatically change the model-of-reality it creates, to perfectly match the ever changing observations" and the light that statement may shed on the correct interpretation of Everett's Many-Worlds Interpretation of QM or the existence of an actual Multiverse.

Rob McEachern

Hi Rob,Eckards,

Dear Rob,it is well said all this indeed.Friendly

CAUSALITY :) I am going to create a group to convice this UN with Concrete global solutions,mainly the liberation of funds of this World Bank and the industiralisation with determinism of our solar system and a harmonisation on Earth of ecosystems and their interactions.We must give water,food,energy,jobs,hopes to the majority and our actual global system cannot reach the points of equilibrium.The persons in this team must be totally univeral and altruist and skilling in sciences without Vanity.We can do it with the good persons and the good solutions,we cannot accept this globality and for the next generations this stupid global system forgetting the universal foundamentals.

lol Joe,you are a phenomen in fact and the Word is weak.Can you please tell us more about your philosophical point of vue? please,please,PLEASE Joe my friend human of this Sphere :)

Steve,

The 300 Ph.D. Diploma holders fully understand my letters to them explaining Natural Visible Reality. Indeed, Professor Markus Mueller of the Vienna Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information did send me an email confirming that all philosophers and theoretical physicists have always guessed about the real structure of the universe, but he only made "good" guesses, not arbitrary ones.

Joe Fisher, Patient Realist

Joe it is wonderful this,so you are going to have a nobel prize in philosophy and physics.I have questions ,so please answer me. Do you consider God? if yes tell me the link between the infinity and the finite systems and the infinities utilised inside this physicality.Second question why a surface ,we have a pure 3D to contemplate and we have extradimensions due to geometrical algebras,so explain me.Third question,what is for you the essence of particles,strings? points? surfaces coded?