Steven Wolfram has shown, with his cellular automata, that highly complex patterns can sometimes develop from simple reiterative processes.

I don't think Steven Wolfram knows the difference between a pattern, and a process.

Look at ice crystals. All you have to do is remove heat from water or molten rock, and the atoms/molecules slow down into a lattice arrangement. That's easy.

But creating life is a process. It's more like a self assembly factory. Step 1: you need materials. You need about 120 elements called the periodic table. If your outcome if a periodic table of elements, then you need to get protons to fuse together (fusion). So you need a strong force to overcome the repulsion between two protons. It has to be stronger than the coulomb force, or the protons won't fuse into a nucleus. How are you going to make nuclei? You're going to use a nuclear furnace. If the strong force is too strong, then all the energy that is released during fusion will be given off during the big bang. You need these nuclear furnaces (called stars) to burn for billions of years. This is engineering!

Do atheists think that factories are accidents?

Joe,

I can make a very logical argument that life, biological cells, starting with a big bang, looks more like a factory, it looks like a set of processes that were carefully thought out before implemented.

You might question that God is a white man. In my opinion, I think God is a Jew! LOL

Jason,

You can only unnaturally make an infinite number of finite written arguments about any finite subject, visible or invisible, factual or fictional, you wish. But the only truth that has ever been proven was that there has only ever been, and there will only ever continue to be ONE unified VISIBLE INFINITE surface ETERNALLY occurring in ONE INFINITE dimension that am always mostly illuminated by ONE INFINITE type of finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Joe,

What you are saying sounds like mathematics. But mathematics doesn't make things exist.

What I'm saying is that biological existence looks like an end process of a factory. The big bang looks like the beginning process of a factory. Factories don't happen by accidental.

Jason,

Factory worker

Jason,

I post sensible comments. I do not provide audio files.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Joe Fisher,

I'm not sure reality is sensible. But the NDE/ghost stuff is more realistic than anything I've heard from theoreticians.

Jadon

There are two facts that have been established. First, the universe is Intelligently Designed by virtue of the physics constants being impossible to achieve by accident; odds of 1 in 10^10^148 are truly impossible. Second, God loves us. There are so many near death experiences where God, beings of light (angels?) have shown love to us; even when we've been bad. Modernists might question the whole "spare the rod, spoil the child" teaching, but an argument can be made that God follows that teaching whether we like it or not. The unavoidable truth and fact is that God loves us, even if God inspires fear in us. God is not required to live by our modern values.

The best that we human beings can ever hope to do is to use our free will to take care of one another, and make our outpost, out physical civilization as comfortable and safe for ourselves and our children, as best we can.

Dear Jason,

INFINITE Natural visible reality has to be ETERNAL. Although white male physicists and philosophers like to relentlessly publish supposedly finite information about invisible influences, they only prove how unnaturally ignorant they are.

Joe Fisher, Sensible Realist

I don't like to buy into the dogma of liberalism, white privilege and all that animosity towards men that is taught in our universities. I like to look at facts and data. The near death experience experiences are a collection of data that can help us understand how we are expected to live our lives.

I don't feel like it's my place to tell you how it says to live "your" life. I will only comment from my personal opinion, that those who are liberals have misunderstood the role of Christianity and religion. Religion is not about telling you or me or anyone that they should go out and kill other people or enslave them. Religion is about creating a community where you and I and other people can feel like they share a common heritage, a common set of values.

It really does look to me, and I might even make the argument as such, that we are souls who have (re)incarnated into this physical world that is built upon invisible quanta made of time-energy (action); that act like mathematics. But when we leave our body (possibly in death) our soul is freed to with God, in LOVE. The evidence of NDE's tells us, very consistently, that death is not what atheists and liberals think it is.

Jason

Theorists are obsessed with superstrings and blackholes. But reality offers quantum entanglement with no explanation of gravity. It's as if nature is telling us: Hey, why worry about strings when you have me to experiment on?

Physicists are skeptical of gravity manipulation. But consider a system of two quantum entangled photons. Newtonian gravity says that the force between two masses separated by distance r is given by F = GMm/r^2. How many steps would you have to glean to go from Newtonian gravity to gravity manipulation? I count 3 leaps of intuition.

1. The effective mass of a photon is m = hf/c^2. So two entangled photons do have mass, therefore, there is a tiny acceleration field between them.

2. Space does what mass tells it to according to the Einstein equations. However, that doesn't mean we can't manipulate the entanglement between two photons to get back something that looks like a gravity field.

3. We control the entangled photons p1 and p2. Photons can travel along a fiber optic cable. In theory, we could align the optical fiber along the radii of a spinning disk. Then, we could centrifuge the p1 photon along the blueshift direction and centrifuge the p2 photon along the redshift direction. It would be similar to storing gravitational potential energy between the two entangled photons.

Physicists are prepared to wait a thousand years for someone to prove this mathematically. But the experiment, while challenging and sophisticated, would be easier to perform.

6 days later

You're doing it all wrong. Not just you. The whole physics community is completely missing what's causing physics to work, and the nature of consciousness.

Best wishes,

Jason Wolfe

The foundation of physics, the simplest mechanism available that could explain everything, QM, GR, standard model particles, it will really surprise you all, if you haven't already guessed it. Quantum gravity is at hand.

6 days later

Hi Joe, what is mostly illuminated by ONE INFINITE type of finite non-surface light. Please could you develop and explain the real meaning Joe ? Illuminated means light, and you say by one infinite light that is finite and also not a surface (or border) - it all seems nonsensical...

6 days later

Dear Steve,

You keep asking finite questions. Nature provided ONE visible reality BEFORE any human beings appeared and started publishing finite questions. It logically follows that Natural Visible Reality MUST be INFINITE. Although human beings have finite-sized eyes and are capable of looking through finite-sized telescopes and microscopes, as there am only ONE Infinite visible surface, they will only ever see some visible surface. In order for the INFINITE visible surface to be seen, it must be finitely illuminated by ONE sort of finite NON-SURFACE light. Have you left Belgium yet? I holidayed in Bruges when I was about 15 years old.

Joe Fisher, Visible Realist

it's been a long time.... Anyone about causality? The universe is a logical system. This means it can only be made of one type of stuff and logically accepts only one type of cause. Then, find only one example of each ... and you have your answer for the ID of the stuff and of the cause. To this end, I give you, once more, my favorite quote from physicist Bil Unruh;

' .. A more accurate way of summarizing the lessons of General Relativity is

that gravity does not cause time to run differently in different places (e.g., faster far from the earth than near it). Gravity is the unequable flow of time from place to place. It is not that there are two separate phenomena, namely gravity and time and that the one, gravity, affects the other. Rather the theory states that the phenomena we usually ascribe to gravity are actually caused by time's flowing unequably from place to place... " arXiv:gr-qc/9312027v2 17 Dec 1993

So, the stuff is Time and the cause is time flowing unequably from place to place.

I am working on another demo involving EM induction ... so I don't have to quote Unruh all the time .. and will be quoting myself :-)

Marcel,

    I call them Planck action quanta because their first manifested physics constant is the Planck constant with units joule-seconds. Planck quantum expand at the speed of light, spherical-ly. I'm trying to explain the invariance of c, the nature of time, quantum states of position, momentum, spin, and the foundation of physics. Also causality.

    Jason; very interesting. documents. website ??

    I have:

    - stuff/substance: dynamic spontaneous process w spherical expansion

    - the Planck is a range of rates within which the stuff will operate logically with each other. i.e. stuff with different Planck value belong to different universe.

    - rate of time process is the variable.

    So, dynamic stuff with one property h, one variable 1/t:

    - spontaneous and generating process = explosive = spherical exp

    Some of it in very short..

    Hi Marcel-Marie,

    No website. But it's something to work on.

    These Planck action quanta, with radius of R=ct, are an unlimited quantity, constantly expanding from a point everywhere in spacetime, since the big bang. They will replace the Copenhagen and many world interpretation of quantum mechanics because, as they expand, they collide with particulate matter and naturally become the "things" that quantum wave functions are describing. Most quantum wave functions have momentum, position and spin states associated with them. These PAQeons (Planck action units) therefor have to have momentum, position and spins states built into them. PAQeons also have all of the physics constants built into them as measureable behavior; at least h, c, G. The gravitational constant is expressed when PAQeons start to overlaps as they get large and become part of the spacetime continuum. PAQeons have a surface area A = 4pi(ct)^2 and a volume V = 4/3pi(ct)^3. The overlapping of surface area by many PAQeons is the "present", the time at which interaction between particles occuplying quantum states is possible. The volume(s) of PAQeons is considered the (hidden) history of quantum states and is considered inaccessible except for one experimentally testable case. If two photons are quantum entangled, that are said to have a PAQeon between them. The quantum states inside of the PAQeon could be used to store gravitation potential energy, opening the door to low energy gravity field manipulation. The PAQeon is the intended answer to the light cone. Why is the speed of light invariant? Answer: because PAQeons do all the work. All of the quantum states built into the PAQeon connect directly to standard model particles. The creation of standard model particles has to do with the high energy interaction of "many" PAQeons in a way that creates particle fields. PAQeons are both clocks and rulers. Short lived PAQeons become the quantum wave functions. Longer lived PAQeons overlap their quantum states of position to become spacetime geometry. So the answer to: why is QM so different from GR? The answer is that one or a few PAQeons create quantum wavefunctions, but very large numbers of overlapped PAQeons become spacetime geometry.

    PAQeons are better than superstrings because superstrings need 11D of spacetime. PAQeons provide the building blocks of spacetime, and also the quantum states with which to put particles. PAQeons also radiate from inertial reference frames to spread "information" and to assert: which frame is largest/heaviest to determine which twin ages in relativistic experiments.

    The other nice thing about PAQeons is that we can finally answer: why does time have a direction? Because PAQeons ONLY expand, mix with other PAQeons, and establish a permanent history.

    Jason

    In my opinion, you're not supposed to write an equation for God. God, the Father, is this omnipotent intelligence that created the universe. Love and supplication, awe. Reverence, holiness, ...

    As to how God creates time, I think there are Planck action quanta that have all the physics constants written into them. I call them PAQeons. PAQeons have time and quantum states built together. Particles attack to quantum states and are therefore subject to the time given by the eternal supply of PAQeons.