Hello, it is a good extrapolation but you don t solve the quantum gravitation. If it was the case, it d be the nobel prize, the BHs are not for me the auantum bricks of this quantum gravitation. The problem is that you have forgotten to insiert several parameters, you have analysed these informations but they don t answer even in developing some maths in correlations with the works of Hawking. There are too much assumptions not proved, but it is a good attenpt that said. This quantum weakest force , I have reached it , needs to insert a different logic than our actual photonic relativistic electromagnetic reasoning. I have reached it in encoding particles of cold dark matter weaker than our electromagntic forces, I consider a gravitational coded aether made of finite series of spheres. I have considered series of quantum BHs farer than our nuclear forces too and that implies a fith force, we see easily that this standard model is encircled, The problems with the different attemps are numerous , like connes and his non commutativity, he has not reach it , like verlinde and his entropical gravity, or Lisi and his E8, or the twistors of Penrose or the loops or the strings, the main problems are that they consider that ewe have onnly photons like main essence or that we have strings at tghis planck scale giving the properties of matters, the geometries, the topologies, the emergent space time. Like the geometrodynamics it is the same problem with the points and the fields. Because our main origin philosophical is not a 1D main field, biut in logic coded particles.
I don t want to be too much rude but sometimes the generality is essential, if not the persons try to be relevant but no, they are false, and I don t want that they are considered like crackpot. You can do better I beleive in all humility and with respect. Think beyond the box and forget your electromagnetic relativistic photonic chains..... :) don t be irritated, try to go deeper simply, you can do it.Regards
