CAN THE FUTURE CREATE THE PAST? by Gyöngyi Bokor
Dear Gyongyi. Very structured and beautiful writing right from the heading- can the future create the past ? very foundational thought I believe in such an idea. rated you well.Hope you kindly read my essay -https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.where I discuss how all could be a product of Brain Neuroscience. All the best in the essay.keep up the good thoughts.Thanks
Dear Agus H Budiyanto,
Thanks again for your constructive comment. Thanks to you, I have been able to read very exciting studies on the subject I have discussed. I tried to get to know the Omega Point Theory you mentioned and your theory as thoroughly as possible. Both raise incredibly exciting questions.
Your essay examines whether TOE (theory of everything; a complete theory that fully describes the physical world.) satisfies the conditions of Godel's incompleteness theorem. You point out, that a general theory of reality is possible only if we are able to overcome the incompleteness theorem. Therefore we have to move beyond finite methods and move to infinity. This is the method of how reality could mean everything. However, the TOE can only describe the known finite world. Therefore, TOE is incomplete.
If I interpret correctly, your theory seeks a general universal theory and universal omniscience. Therefore, you describe the world as „Process-Univerism". All universes (multiverse) are heading to a unique universe, which can not be embedded in any larger universe. That will be unique and can not be extended. In this new universe the maximality principle, the model of the final theory can be realised. This is the absolute everything, the absolute omniscience.
Omniscince and Consciousness
Well, what is really common in our theory is that in the future there will be complete, unified omniscience in one unified system. Our present knowledge is thus incomplete, as our present perceptible world shows only a small part of the universe. In my theory, the other part of the information is in wormholes, in the other dimension. However, there is no multiverse in my theory. It is our own future universe, which organizes the omniscience into one system, the network of wormholes.
Although both theories assume a closed universe, I would move a little away from the spiritualism of Omega Point Theory. The theory presumes an angelic sphere, eternal life, and God at the final meeting point. In contrast, I see these gathering places and points as a set of information and energy. Nevertheless, the idea that these wormholes may even have some kind of consciousness cannot be rejected. At this point, the question may arise as to where the boundary between knowledge and consciousness is. Quite a few researchers say the universe has a sense of consciousness.(1) However, this is probably very different from human consciousness. As Christof Koch writes; "The only dominant theory we have of consciousness says that it is associated with complexity -- with a system's ability to act upon its own state and determine its own fate," "Theory states that it could go down to very simple systems. In principle, some purely physical systems that are not biological or organic may also be conscious."
I could also add David Deutch's theory that human beings are actually for the purpose of the constant transmission of information. In other words, the purpose of the universe is not to lose information. Therefore, human existence and with it the whole universe is also a kind of set of information that is never lost, only transformed. It should be mentioned at this point, that many experiments have shown that even particles are able to react to their environment as they behave differently when observed.
Geometry and Hologram
We are seeing more and more phenomena that prove that the expansion of the universe is not uniform. Moreover, sometimes it still moves in certain directions. So it is conceivable that there are anomalies in the spacetime system, as possibly huge ancient black holes determine the motion of planets and galaxies.(2)
But there are other anomalies in spacetime too. If we accept the proposition that Einstein Rosen's wormhole looks like a black hole on one side, we can also accept that we get into it in a similar way. It's clear we can't come back, but we want to get to the big bang anyway now. According to the general theory of relativity created by Albert Einstein, spacetime theoretically allows travel not only in space but also in time. In my words: there is no space travel, only spacetime travel, because, one cannot move without the other.
It is undoubtedly true that the Omega Point Theory is similar to mine as everything ends up at one point, so the universe is closed. However, OPT explains how time slows down to a kind of forever reality in the future, where development stops in full perfection. In contrast, my theory is about how space-time curvature eventually leads to the past. It does this in such a way that the space-time curvature leads to another dimension, (3) a kind of wormhole network, where space and time converge, past and future can meet, and lead to a point, the big bang. If we were in the hidden network, we would perceive the big bang as continuous, but if we were in our own (outside) world, we would see it as a point.
Ergo, the forever timeline with the big bang projected into our spacetime structure is a point. It looks like we're screwing through a piece of paper with an endless pencil. But in this case, the flat paper is our four-dimensional world, and the pencil is the forever network. So the big bang, in the forever network, happening forever. Actually, it looks eternal from the network point of view. But it happened only once, from our point of view, from our dimension. So the big bang is a point but also connects all the networks. As the big bang became a point, it dilates and creates our world. Forever and also once.
The projected hologram shows all the information of the original object, therefore the big bang can have all the information, in one tiny little point, which is just enough to create our whole Universe. Hence, the whole system works like a hologram. My theory details, that it will be the future, when every information will fall into one way wormholes and will get to the big bang. As information is falling into wormholes, space dimensions are slowly disappearing and changing continuously into plus time dimensions as it is getting longer and longer to an infinitive time dimension. As big bang explodes into our world, it can gain space dimensions back, meanwhile, it loses time dimensions. Forever time will be reduced to one dimension, one point, a point-like event on our surface.
1.
Is Consciousness Universal?
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-consciousness-universal/
Christof Koch
January 1, 2014
2.
The Laniakea supercluster of galaxies
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13674
R. Brest Tully, Helene Courtois, Yehuda Hoffman, Daniel Pomaréde
2 September, 2014
Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the LX-T scaling relation
https://www.aanda.org/component/article?access=doi&doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201936602
K Mikgas, G. Schellenberger, T.H.Reiprich, F Pacaud, M.E. Ramos-Ceja, L.Lovisari
29 August, 2019
3.
Cosmolog: The Science of the Universe
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cosmology/11AC2B00B82FD43D507A145C26F58A2B
Edward Harrison
2015Attachment #1: FQXi_spacetime_wire_curvatures.jpgAttachment #2: FQXi_past_present_future.jpg
Well.. I have to commend you.
It takes courage to set out something like this that on the surface appears ridiculous, but is in some sense realistic or possibly accurate. I am, in fact, working in a theoretical framework that is CPT-symmetric with respect to our universe, so half of the cosmos is going the other way in time, only to meet up later at the end of the cycle. It will not be obvious to most people reading my essay that this is the case, but that is how the theory works, or what it tells me. So you are somewhat on track, in my view.
However; your arguments are weak in some places, and you have only a tenuous connection back to the essay question. It could be said that the future tyrannizes the past, because its rule is absolute. But most people would say "how could what hasn't happened yet influence the now?" Well; the idea of a holographic projection of current events onto a 2-d screen at the cosmos' end makes sense. At least it is not a total wipeout. So I give you partial credit on several areas of assessment. Overall an enjoyable read, but not definitive.
All the Best,
Jonathan
Dear Jonathan J. Dickau,
Thank you very much for your attention and comment. I am very grateful that you took the time to read my study.
To be honest, I know that my essay is provocative as it follows a very wild logic. However, I had an interesting assumption and I tried to deduce reasonably following its logical rules. I confess I guessed that I would get strong criticism of certain parts. And I guessed it was the parts you mentioned.
WORMHOLES AND THE BIG BANG
My basic hypothesis is that if the wormholes of Einstein-Rosen's have the same input geometry as the black holes, then they probably have a similarly extreme spacetime geometry, but without singularity. If we accept the proposition that Einstein Rosen's wormhole looks like a black hole on one side, we can also accept that we get into it in a similar way. It's clear we can't come back, but according to my theory, we want to get to the big bang anyway. According to the general theory of relativity created by Albert Einstein, extreme spacetime curvatures theoretically allows travel not only in space but also in time, besides; ANYWHERE in the spacetime. It is important to highlight on this point; there is no space travel, only spacetime travel, because, one cannot move without the other. My theory is about how space-time curvature eventually may lead to a very special past and time point, the big bang. It does this in such a way that the space-time curvature leads to another dimension, a kind of wormhole network, where space and time converge, past and future can meet, and lead to a point, the big bang.
CAUSALITY PARADOX
It is a well-known fact that there should be far more matter in the universe than we measure, calculated from the energy of the big bang. I assume the missing part is in the wormholes. However, if the present were to create the big bang, it would not be possible because the wormholes in the present do not yet contain all the material of the universe. Wormholes must contain all the materials of the universe so that there is enough energy in the big bang to form our universe.
You ask the question of how an event that has not yet happened can define our world. This process can be created by the other, hidden dimension in the wormholes where the past, present and future happening at the same time. Forever, also in a point. In the hidden other dimensions, there is a malleable extreme spacetime structure where even the principle of causality is overturned. This hidden other dimension perceives space-time structures and processes that have not yet happened in our world. My offer is to assume the existence of structures that simultaneously see the past, present, and the future, and are able to interpret them as a unit.
Let me be even more popular now. (I'm probably going to lose all my score now, but it doesn't matter. I submitted my essay for interesting and exciting discussions.) I would draw your attention to a very cleverly designed film: Arrival. In this film, aliens are able to perceive the past, present, and future at the same time. Their thinking and language also reflect this unified system. Both their writing and language are circular, recurring, and non-linear because they perceive time as a complex set of times. Their present events are not considered a major time section. (Little known about the fact, but the film was developed by the works by linguists and sign experts. There was an incredible amount of professional work involved in developing all the visual effects, and even a completely new circular language.)
Some of your ideas have resonance with my essay in which antimatter is suggested to travel backwards in time. In my essay I bypass Bell's Theorem by the use of antimatter travelling backwards in time. Bell's Theorem is absolutely correct of course in normal circumstances. By normal I mean for matter of every type travelling forwards in time. Bell's Theorem correctly rules out local hidden variables of particles but is IMO bypassed for antimatter travelling backwards in time as (if say for simplicity that Alice measures only antiparticles) Alice measures antiparticles travelling (from afar and inwards) towards the source of (supposed) creation of the particle pairs. So the correlation is not really between entangled pairs because Alice is measuring antiparticles well before they become entangled. They are only entangled between the Source and Alice. In relevance to the essay set theme, the hidden variables are not track-able through a measurement. So there is no way that Alice's measurement on a particular antiparticle can be followed through to a particular measurement by Bob on a particular particle. That introduces probability into the measurements which means that counterfactual determinism cannot be true in this context. Hence the Quantum Randi challenge cannot be beaten. The explanation for that is not that locality is forbidden but is that: antiparticles travel backwards in time; the particle pairs at the time of measurement are not entangled; the local hidden variables can exist and cause the results which exceed Bell Inequalities; but hidden variables travelling through a measurement are not computable. Further, the experimental results in this context are trivially correct and are in accordance with Malus Law, as the effect of the entanglement near the source is to provide Bob with a source of particles pre-polarised along Alice's detector's vector setting.
I have not thought much about BHs and wormholes which are covered in your essay. I do have a paper, though, suggesting that dark energy (and dark matter) is caused by negative mass particles. See the professional paper by Farnes on this also. These DE particles are not necessarily antimatter but if they were to be then the accelerating expansion of the universe is being driven by antimatter. Antimatter as DE would also repel itself to the far distance. But if one adds in time reversal as well as negative mass, then from the point of view of an antiparticle ....? It is moving through time (which it can only view as forward) and instead of repelling matter it is attracting it. (Does it think it has derived from a point source anti-BB?) When it finds matter and examines it closely it will realise it is not matter but antimatter. Will it think that the universe is a bit short on content of what it considers to be antimatter? (Whereas in my scenario there is an equal balance but an unequal distribution in space and time). Need to think much more on this ... so thank you for your thought-provoking essay.
Austin Fearnley
Dear Michael,
Thank you very much for your attention and comment. I am very grateful that you took the time to read my study.
In your essay, you examine very interesting questions, and some of them are related to my suggestions in many ways.
I like your opinion below.
"Measure is an Agreed Standard, Consented and Stipulated in convention to enable us to understand and Calibrate perceivable units of the universe like scalar quantities e.g., mass, length, time, volume and Vectors from an agreed unit. We reside in an infinite universe (Reality) it's within this agreed units that we build a finite world that we can Comprehend and define using abstractions (theory). It's in that context and principle and within these unit "Brackets" I earlier defined as "Perceptual limits of thought" that our brains thus Impose Empirical parameters that we call measure to the infinite universe we encounter."
I often come to a similar conclusion, and that is one of the reasons why my essay was born. My opinion is also that it is incredibly difficult to describe the universe with our current metrics. We apply a human scale and a finite view to a universe with a completely different scale. My theory is also provocative because it contains a hidden dimension that is very difficult to describe with the metrics of human spacetime structure. In my opinion, the strange, often difficult-to-express value of metrics and measurement results is also confusing. We are trying to discuss quantities and sizes that are very difficult to imagine and to convey with metrics. I think it would be interesting to create some other descriptive system to characterize the universe. There is a very interesting theory for interpreting the universe on a geometric basis, developed by Garrett Lisi in 2007. (1)
There is another remarkable part of your essay that I find incredibly exciting.
"The filter window we view our world. It is a means of Natural selection in Evolution trying to outwit indeterminism in an otherwise expansive, unpredictable; in measurable, complex environment that presents itself to us Biological structures as the Universe. Physics is a product of consciousness (life). Predictability is thus a consequence (outcome/decision) of a Carbon based Biological structure tunneling mathematically through this complex maze constrained by limits of Biological senses."
You go further than me. In my essay, I describe a hidden world, network, which has extreme spacetime curvature, and therefore, indefinable dimensions, where the past, present and future happening at the same time. This system has a kind of indeterminism (in your word). Forever, also in a point. In the hidden other dimensions, there is a strange spacetime structure where even the principle of causality is overturned. This kind of system is completely uncomprehended by a human. As I wrote you go further as you assume even our perceivable spacetime structure is only a perception by a human, human brain. You assume that even this world might be disordered working in indeterminism, and it is only our human brain which would like to comprehend as an ordered causal determinist system with its physical rules.
I think, that it is a beautiful idea, and I quite like it.
1.
An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything
https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0770
https://www.ted.com/talks/garrett_lisi_an_8_dimensional_model_of_the_universe
https://li.si/
2007 Garrett Lisi
Dear Gyöngyi Bokor,
Thank you for your interesting essay.
I have some remarks about Time.
Time itself does not exist. There are only motions. Motion is used as the time standard. The time is handy way to compare motions. Universal time (expansion rate of Universe) is irreversible. Local movements can be reversible, i.e., the local time can be reversible. More in: About Arrow of Time. http://viXra.org/abs/1902.0495.
The Time dilatation is apparent. All problems arise from wrong interpretation of Relativity. The Lorenz equations allow calculate real values from apparent measured values. More in:
About Tests of Special Relativity. http://viXra.org/abs/1909.0137
New Concept of Special Relativity. http://viXra.org/abs/1911.0367.
Best regards
Ilgaitis
Dear Ilgaitis Prusis,
My explanation a little bit longer than a simple comment, so I would add a link if you do not mind. I would be very grateful if you could read it anyway. I am very thankful for your interesting comment.
Dear Austin Fearnley,
Thank you very much for reading my essay. You also deal with time-returning particles in your theory, as you examine how Bell's Theorem can apply to antimatter when Alice measures time-reversed antiparticles and Bob measures normal time particles. This is a very exciting problem, for as you write, Bell's Theorem does not deal with this question. If I understand correctly, you will deduce in your theory how many problems can be solved, with the solution that the antiparticles travel backwards in time. At first glance, the measurement process seems a bit complicated. Should a particle travelling back in time be measured before the quantum entanglement? How do I know they will be entangled? There are a number of other interesting questions that may arise.
Indeed, I also mention a theory developed by Prof. Neil Turok and colleagues (1). This theory is about the fact that during the big bang, when matter and antimatter separated, the antimatter started backwards in time. Therefore, two universes are evolving, one is ours and the other one is going back in time. In my essay, I mention a hidden network where information and energy can travel. However, it is quite difficult to decide whether the network of the hidden dimension is made up of wormholes or black holes. Wormholes have the advantage that information is not lost as they avoid the singularity. I mention the antimatter universe theory because according to some researches, antimatter could stabilize wormholes. It might be a wild idea, but antimatter flowing backwards could stabilize wormholes. However, black holes have some advantages also. They can store information on their inner surface. Which is better to receive and transmit information? It is difficult to decide because we do not know too much about wormholes. However, there are numerous possibilities. One experiment implies, that black holes are themselves collapsing wormholes (2). Other experiment shows, how black holes created wormholes. This article is also interesting for your work. (3) "A group of scientists showed that by creating two entangled black holes, then pulling them apart, they formed a wormhole -- essentially a "shortcut" through the universe -- connecting the distant black holes....The theoretical results bolster the relatively new and exciting idea that the laws of gravity holding together the universe may not be fundamental but arise from something else: quantum entanglement. This is where quantum entanglement could play a role. It might appear that the concept of entanglement -- one of the most fundamental in quantum mechanics -- is in direct conflict with general relativity: Two entangled particles, "communicating" across vast distances, would have to do so at speeds faster than that of light -- a violation of the laws of physics, according to Einstein. It may, therefore, come as a surprise that using the concept of entanglement in order to build up space-time may be a major step toward reconciling the laws of quantum mechanics and general relativity."
1
CPT-Symmetric Universe
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08928
Neil Turok, Latham Boyle, Kieran Finn
2018
2
Black Holes Could Actually Be Colliding Wormholes
https://www.livescience.com/62834-colliding-wormholes-gravitational-waves.html
By Marcus Woo
June 15, 2018
3
You can't get entangled without a wormhole
http://news.mit.edu/2013/you-cant-get-entangled-without-a-wormhole-1205
Jennifer Chu,
December 5, 2013
You have chosen a great theme! But you come from standard concepts of time. We introduce a new concept of time. The following definitions are given: 1) there is a set that we call "Time"; 2) this set consists of an infinite number of individual elements, which we call "Moments"; 3) all elements of a given set have a peculiarity: if one element is REAL, all other elements of the set are UNREAL; 4) we will call sets of this type - "AREAL SETS". It was found that the elementary areal relation is a logical law of contradiction: statements A and NOT-A together form an areal set of two elements.
Formulating the law of contradiction, Aristotle and all the logicians after him constantly emphasized: there cannot be A and NOT-A in the same respect at the same TIME. We propose to rearrange the emphasis: in our formulation, AREALITY is a special logical relation that can simulate natural Time. The proposed ontology is related to the definition and introduction of the digital physics paradigm.
Since we and you are thinking about time, we will give you a high rating. Honor our essay. Let's continue the conversation)))
Dear Gyöngyi Bokor,
Thank you for your essay. Do you think it's possible for smaller creatures to have a different experience of time? Like an ant for instance, is one month for us conceptually equal to years to them?
cc walters
Sounds like Fun!
No worries from me.
Jonathan
Dear Pavel,
The ideas you outline are incredibly interesting. I really like the way you reinterpret time. What is beautiful about this phenomenon is that it can be interpreted in a thousand ways. If I understand correctly from your outline that you consider only the present to be distinguished, both the past and the future are secondary. You do not rank the past and future. In some ways, my essay suggests something similar. Otherwise, this kind of approach, an interpretation that moves a little away from human observation (memory, the anthropic principle, etc.), and seeks to interpret the universe by excluding the subjectivity of human observation. I try to use the same method.
I really like that you are dealing with time on a really deep philosophical level. I try to approach it similarly, but my approach is more geometrically based. I admire your deep really fundamental questions. Thank you very much for your comment.
Dear Nancy Walters,
Your question seems simple at first reading. However, very seriously, with careful consideration of the issue, it requires such an incredibly multifaceted investigation that there is, unfortunately, no time to do so now. Comments will be closed in a few hours. This is a very interesting question and a lot of physical factors should be considered.
How time perception is affected by our own mass, the masses near us, our movement, our location in the universe, our physiological processes, the energy used, and so on. Incredibly interesting question. It is very worth dealing with. Congratulations!
Nowadays, as far as I see, more and more researchers working on to save black holes. Therefore, I think, some interesting experiments can be linked to my essay.
The most accepted view about black holes is that information crossing their horizons, glows and leaves in the form of radiation. So, after a while, the black hole itself runs out of material and disappears. However, some interesting theories have been born recently explaining the possibility that there might be something beyond black holes.(1)
There are a couple of very interesting phenomena emerging when we examine the so-called mathematical, fictitious black holes. These are not really existing black holes, but so-called thought experiments that scientists are working on in order to understand how black holes work. Nevertheless, in such cases, we have to accept the fact that we do not study black holes under astronomical conditions, but with fictitious mathematical, and abstract methods.
Mathematical modelling and calculations show, that information falling into the black hole can still be saved from destruction, as black holes can store, transmit, and distribute information much more efficiently than it was thought. Some experiments showed even more interesting phenomena. Stepping into a higher dimension, lot more types of black holes emerge, in multiple shapes, with multiple horizons with different rings, spheres, and various forms.
Moreover, in some experiments, string theorists have studied the phenomenon of how black holes would behave in a narrowing space in a universe with a negative cosmological constant. In such a case, the horizon of the black holes can be an infinite plane. So, according to the researchers, in a higher dimension in a universe with a negative cosmological constant, black holes are eternal.
For example, we can play with the idea that our present expanding universe, with a positive cosmological constant, might shrink in certain places, for example near black holes. Then, our space-time slowly slides toward a negative cosmological constant, at the same time, slowly slides into the higher dimension, the infinite existence of black holes. In my essay, I discuss the same scenario, but with a different geometric approach. Both approaches allow the assumption that one-time events in our world exist forever in the hidden higher dimension, in the form of information. The hidden dimension only contacts our present space-time system with certain tentacles, and they appear as certain events and phenomena. (In my essay, I explain in details, how eternal processes show their information as a holographic projection onto the surface of our space-time. In fact, in this case, it really doesn't matter if they are a one-second big bang or a billion-year-old black hole.)
According to another mathematical experiment, there can be other ways out of information destruction too.(2) According to the study, there is a mathematical solution where the information does not burn and the black hole does not evaporate but can live on by smuggling back the Einstein equations, through a kind of weak singularity. The outcome remains uncertain and unpredictable because the characteristics of spacetime here are not known for sure. Therefore, equations can point into any direction of the past or the future, but the information itself remains. The researchers started from an interesting assumption: if we do not assume that we have a so-called smooth basis for creating a working formula, and we derive our formulas from an uncertain baseline, Einstein formulas still can work. In this case, the vague area from which we form our formulas is the area of the so-called smooth singularities. The calculations of Mihalis Dafermos and Jonathan Luk indicate a kind of infinite spacetime possibility in the so-called smooth, light-like singularity of black holes.
In many cases, quantum physics comes to a similar conclusion.(3) Leonard Susskind and Juan Maldacena concluded that certain black holes could be connected to form wormholes, ER (Einstein Rosen bridge), and this could be linked to the phenomenon of quantum entanglement, EPR (Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen). So: ER = EPR. Moreover, in fact, the two phenomena are one, and basically, they are two manifestations of the same thing. In other words, when we experience the simultaneity of entanglement, then, we experience two ends of a microscopic wormhole. If this is true, then the information is able to flow through intertwined wormholes. Experiments have finally demonstrated how black holes are able to form a wormhole and flow information by the phenomenon of quantum entanglement. So, there can be a coherent network of black holes and wormholes in an extended space-time, showing infinite values in which information can flow easily. Researchers believe that such entanglement can connect even the most distant points of the universe, and in fact, these connections hold the universe together.
Since I base my essay on the fact that space and time are inextricably linked, I believe that if such intertwined wormholes are able to connect the most distant points of space, they also connect the most distant times. And since the phenomenon of quantum entanglement is all about that simultaneity, I can assume that the past, present, and even the distant future can be connected in wormholes. "I think we now understand that space-time really is just a geometrical representation of the entanglement structure of these underlying quantum systems," said Mark Van Raamsdonk, a theoretical physicist at the University of British Columbia.(4)
Both Susskind and Maldacena were greatly inspired by the work of Mark Van Raamsdonk, who conducted a thought experiment that suggested that the quantum entanglement and space-time are closely related. According to Raamsdonk, our present relative space-time structure emerges from the timeless quantum field.
Examining fictitious space-time structures, we see that certain fictitious spaces -- de Sitter and Anti-de Sitter spaces -- emerge like holograms from the field of interconnected qubits. In these distorted worlds, such as Anti-de Sitter spaces, the spatial components will become shorter and shorter as we move away from the centre. Eventually, certain spatial dimensions will disappear and there will be one less spatial dimension at the borders than inside the space. The curved space of the AdS structure and the disappearing spatial dimension is very similar to the space curves near the black holes, as I mentioned at the beginning of this comment. (This presumption is supported by very recent research: if we disrupt an AdS-type negative-curvature spatial system, we can most likely create a narrowing space, and even a very extreme and special spatial curvature, an anomaly, i.e. a black hole.(5) So, we can play with the idea the other way around. If a black hole is formed by the collapse of a star, can it create an AdS, negative curvature space around it?)
However, another fictitious geometry of space has also been studied, the so-called de Sitter space, where, unlike Anti-de Sitter space, it is not space but time that disappears in infinity. There is infinite expansion here, with a positive cosmological constant. At the boundaries of de-Sitter space, the fabric of space-time stretches so hard, that all kinds of causal connections disappear. Although scientists do not yet know exactly how, in both cases the space-time is somehow reborn at the infinite boundaries and the fabric of space-time is re-woven. At the boundaries of the shrinking AdS space, from the field of qubits, a new space-time structure may somehow form with a reborn spatial dimension, while, at the same time, a new space-time structure with a reborn time dimension may form at the boundaries of the dS space.(4) (Although not all details are known yet, the smooth and eternal space-time structure of qubits, at least, provides a good basis for defining and calculating the internal space-time characteristics, according to Raamsdonk.)
So, I had this wild idea to twist the higher-dimensional enclosing space - encompassing de Sitter and Anti-de Sitter surfaces -, and bend the space-time structure to the other direction, in order to obtain the wormholes and tentacles of quantum entanglement. It is exactly the fixed-time quantum world that can be considered a constant system. So, as Raamsdonk mentioned, it can be a reliable basis to deriving and calculating the values of the relative space-time system. Now, we got to my mania again: placing clocks, not in the constantly changing and uncertain space-time structure of the universe, but in the network of the entangled fixed-time wormholes, because its fixed, perpetual space-time seems to be a more secure basis.
Since I still believe in the old Einsteinian formulation, that space and time are inseparable and closely related, I believe that these two fictitious spatial forms and systems can be connected, obviously with the interconnected wormholes. And if I want to link spatial points, I also must connect time points.
According to the present measurements, our universe has positive curvature, an expanding structure similar to de-Sitter space. Well, however, our expanding universe near the large masses can transform into a narrowing space with a kind of AdS structure, in which a spatial dimension disappears and slowly transforms into a time dimension to reach a wormhole network showing infinite time values. There, the fabric of space-time can be re-woven, as many scientists assume, with the birth of new universes. In this case, expanding universes with dS curvature can be born, as a part of the infinite time dimension "explodes" into space, thus creating a new space-time structure.
Our own external dS world shatters, disappears, and all existing material and information falls into an AdS-curved wormhole-network showing the infinite values mentioned at the beginning of this comment. We can not really perceive this AdS structure, because it is slipping into another, a higher dimension. Yet, our finite, countable and perceptible positive space-time structure slides into the wormhole network, an infinitely long space-time structure.
If new universes can be born in the extreme and shrinking space-time structure of black holes, then they have far less material than our entire universe. The information stored or transmitted in one black hole only contains a few galaxies. What are the characteristics of these new smaller universes? What are their main materials? What cosmological characteristics do they have? Can life form in these universes? Are new universes constantly being born or just once? Can each be as fine-tuned as ours to create life? How could these universes be discovered? Is it possible that we are also formed in a huge black hole? Was our black hole formed in an even vaster universe? Are child universes infinitely small? Are our ancestors infinitely big? How big was the very first black hole?
Well, as I mentioned above, if we connect systems in space - both various spatial structures and quantum entanglements -, these must also meet in time. The two things cannot be separated. If we assume that the quantum entanglement can bring together the most distant points of space, then at the same time the most distant times. So, intertwined wormholes have a special property that allows them to connect the furthest points of the universe in space, in an unimaginable short way, and it follows that it connects even the most distant points in time at the point of intertwined simultaneity in the singularity of the black holes and the big bang. The question is what kind of universe has this big bang.
Accepting the fact, that our singularities (AdS, dS, big bang, black hole) and entanglements are the manifestation of something common thing, energy or power, - as I mentioned above in experiments of Susskind and Maldacena -, we have to accept, that eternal and simultaneous pointlike values must meet somewhere in the eternal quantum field. This quantum field is in the higher dimension, where time and space is eternal and also pointlike, and quantum information are simultaneous, all causal values disappear, only information remains. In this interpretation, the quantum entanglement that creates wormholes serves to eliminate the causal relationships in the system. Wormholes are tentacles and holograms projected onto our space-time surface, coming from the non-causal quantum world, just like our own big bang with our black holes.
1.
The Double Life of Black Holes
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-double-life-of-black-holes-20190129/
Sabine Hossenfelder
January 29, 2019
2.
Mathematicians Disprove Conjecture Made to Save Black Holes
https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-disprove-conjecture-made-to-save-black-holes-20180517/
Kevin Hartnett
May 17, 2018
3.
Wormholes Untangle a Black Hole Paradox
https://www.quantamagazine.org/wormhole-entanglement-and-the-firewall-paradox-20150424/
K.C. Cole
April 24, 2015
4.
Quantum Gravity's Time Problem
https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-gravitys-time-problem-20161201
Natalie Wolchover
December 1, 2016
5.
New Math Proves That a Special Kind of Space-Time Is Unstable
https://www.quantamagazine.org/black-holes-prove-that-anti-de-sitter-space-time-is-unstable-20200511/
Steve Nadis
May 11, 2020