• [deleted]

Hello!

The new essay contest "What is possible and impossible in physics?" suggests an essay titled:

"What is possible in physics? Physics!"

Or "Physics is possible in physics."

Or "Physics: The New Frontier of Physics!"

Right away the essay, by devoting itself to physics and physical reality, would debunk strings, lqg, wormholes, time machines, multiverses, the anthropic principle, the gravitgon, giant voids which are unmistakable imprints of universes just beyond our own, and geometric langlands, amongst other well-funded "proifessional" research.

What would be left?

Physics!

*Physical* theories celebrating hitherto unsung *physical* features of the universe such as a fourth expanding dimension, unifying disparate physical phenomena in simple physical model, would become the focus, as all the flotsam and jetsam sank away into time's grey.

"A physical theory can be satisfactory only if its structures are composed of elementary foundations. The theory of relativity is ultimately as little satisfactory as, for example, classical thermodynamics was before Boltzmann had interpreted the entropy as probability. -Einstein in a letter to Arnold Sommerfield on January 14th, 1908. CPAE, Vol. 5, Doc. 73:" "When two systems, of which we know the states by their respective representatives, enter into temporary physical interaction due to known forces between them, and when after a time of mutual influence the systems separate again, then they can no longer be described in the same way as before, viz. by endowing each of them with a representative of its own. I would not call that one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum mechanics, the one that enforces its entire departure from classical lines of thought. By the interaction the two representatives [the quantum states] have become entangled." -Schrödinger

Moving Dimensions Theory's simple postulate, physical model, and equation account for both "relativity's elementary foundations," which Einstein stated we yet needed, and Schrödinger's "characteristic trait" of quantum mechanics--entanglement.

MDT: The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c, or dx4/dt=ic.

"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum mechanics." --Erwin Schrodinger

MDT provides a physical model for qm's characteristic trait. The fourth dimension's expansion distributes locality; so that two photons separated in the three spatial dimensions may yet be connected in the fourth dimension, provided they were locally connected in the three spatial dimensions to begin with. For all entanglement must derive from a common locality in 3D in the past. And too, it is no mystery that photons never age, as they yet retain a locality in the fourth expanding dimension, where they are yet stationary, as they propagate at c through the three spatial dimensions.

"The discovery of the quantum of action shows us not only the natural limitation of classical physics, but, by throwing a new light upon the old philsophical problem of the objective existence of phenomena indepedently of our observations, confronts us with a situation hitherto unknown in natural science." --Niels Bohr

It is not our observations so much as the independent collapse of wavefunctions that define reality. The fourth dimension distributes locality, and matter caught in this appears as photons. When a photon is measured, or when it blackens a spot on a photographic plate, or when it hits a wall, it is localized as it is no longer in the fourth expanding dimension. There is no need for us to participate in this.

"After long reflection in solitude and meditation, I suddenly had the idea, during the year 1923, that the discovery made by Einstein in 1905 should be generalised by extending it to all material particles and notably to electrons." --de Broglie

As the fourth dimension pervades all, all matter interacts with it, thusly inheriting wavelike properties. Indeed, all movement derives from momenergy's existence, at least in part, in the fourth expanding dimension. Photons alone exist entirely in the fourth expanding dimension,

exhibiting zero rest mass.

"The properties of elementary processes....make it seem almost inevitaebleto formulate a truly quantized theory of radiation". --Einstein

This is because all radiation is but matter caught upon the fourth expanding dimension which also distributes locality, exalting probabilistic measurementments via the creation of nonlocal probability ditsributions that expand at the rate of c, determined by dx4/dt=ic.

"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and relativity theories requires not just technical developments but radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell

MDT is based upon the radical conceptual renewal, derived straight from Einstein's 1912 Manuscript. Time is not the fourth dimension, but rather a phenomenon that arises because dx4/dt=ic--because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions, which aslo accounts for entanglement, thusly uniting relativity and quantum mechanics with a common physical model, while also provideing a physical model for entropy and time and all its arrows and assymmetries.

"The conclusions from Bell's theorem are philosophically startling; either one must totally abandon the realistic philosophy of most working scientists or dramatically revise our concept of space-time." -Abner Shimony and John Clauser

Moving Dimensions Theory provides this new concept of space-time. The vast ambitions of most tenure-track physicists, including string theorists and LQG hypers, causes them to focus on irrelevant, minute questions, and thus, though funded by millions for over thirty years, have not yet been able to string the bow. Deeper, true physicists, such as Abner Shimony and John Clauser are alert to the fact that physics need news ideas.

The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new concept of space-time.

"Bohr had an intuitive feeling that Einstein's position, taken serioulsy, would conflict with qunatum mechanics. Buyt it was Bell's theorem which materialized this contradiction." --Alain Aspect

MDT resolves the contradiction. dx4/dt=ic distributes locality, thusly causing qm's nonlocality and probabilistic nature, while also underlying time and all its arrows and assymetries, entropy, the contsancy of c, entanglement, relativity; while also being the foundational cause of all motion; and limiting all motion to but one velocity of c through space-time.

In the next 300 years of fqxi contests, the hopes are that one fqxi insider may read and comment on MDT, instead of exalting multiverses, anti-theories, and giant voids (which suck in funding) which suppodedly offer "unmistakable imprints" of universes just beyond the edge of our own.

The new MDT paper will also focus on how MDT accounts for the time dilation in GPS--something which Chris Kennedy has shown is yet to be accomplished.

Everyone should read Chris Kennedy's awesome paper and discuss! http://www.cheely.com/second_T.pdf

6 months later
  • [deleted]

Can anyone find any faults in these proofs of MDT?

Simple, logical proofs of MDT:

MDT PROOF#1: Relativity tells us that a timeless, ageless photon

remains in one place in the fourth dimension. Quantum mechanics tells

us that a photon propagates as a spherically-symmetric expanding

wavefront at the velocity of c. Ergo, the fourth dimension must be

expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c,

in a spherically-symmetric manner. The expansion of the fourth

dimension is the source of nonlocality, entanglement, time and all its

arrows and asymmetries, c, relativity, entropy, free will, and all

motion, change, and measurement, for no measurement can be made

without change. For the first time in the history of relativity,

change has been wedded to the fundamental fabric of spacetime in MDT.

MDT PROOF#2: Einstein (1912 Man. on Rel.) and Minkowski wrote x4=ict.

Ergo dx4/dt=ic.

MDT PROOF#3: The only way to stay stationary in the three spatial

dimensions is to move at c through the fourth dimension. The only way

to stay stationary in the fourth dimension is to move at c through the

three spatial dimensions. Ergo the fourth dimension is moving at c

relative to the three spatial dimensions.

MDT twitter proof (limited to 140 characters): SR: photon is

stationary in 4th dimension. QM: photon is probability wave expanding

@ c. Ergo: 4th dimension expands @ c & MDT: dx4/dt=ic -from [url]

http://twitter.com/45surf[/url]

Can anyone find any faults in these proofs of MDT?

2 months later

Please see attached paper!

"More intellectual curiosity, versatility and yen for physics than Elliot McGucken's I have never seen in any senior or graduate student. . . ." -John Archibald Wheeler, Princeton University

On Deriving Relativity & Entanglement from MDT's Fundamental Physical Reality: dx4/dt=ic

What is Ultimately Possible in Physics? Physics! A Hero's Journey with Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Planck, Einstein, Schrodinger, Bohr, and the Greats towards Moving Dimensions Theory's dx4/dt=ic. E pur si muove!

by Dr. Elliot McGucken

dx4/dt=ic

"Equations are more important to me, because politics is for the present, but an equation is something for eternity." -Albert Einstein

ABSTRACT:

Over the past few decades prominent physicists have noted that physics has diverged away from its classical, heroic journey traditionally defined by describing, fathoming, and characterizing foundational truths of physical reality via simple, elegant, logically-consistent postulates and equations humbling themselves before empirical reality. Herein the spirit of physics is again exalted by the heroic words of the Greats--by Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Planck, Einstein, Bohr, and Schrodinger--the Founding Fathers upon whose shoulders physics stands. And from that pinnacle, a novel physical theory is proposed, complete with a novel physical model celebrating a hitherto unsung universal invariant and an equation reflecting the foundational physical reality of a fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c, or dx4/dt=ic, providing both the "elementary foundations" for relativity which Einstein yet sought and QM's "characteristic trait"--entanglement, and its nonlocal, probabilistic nature. From MDT's experimentally-verified equation relativity is derived while time is unfrozen and free will exalted, while a physical model accounting for quantum nonlocality is presented. Entropy, Huygens' Principle; the wave/particle, energy/mass, space/time, and E/B dualities; and time and all its arrows and asymmetries emerge from a common, foundational physical model. MDT exalts Einstein's "empirical facts," "naturalness," and "logical simplicity." For the first time in the history of relativity, change is woven into the fabric of space-time, and the timeless, ageless, massless, nonlocal photon of Galileo's/Einstein's "empirical world" is explained via a foundational physical model, alongside the fact that c is constant, independent of the source, and the maximum velocity in the universe, as well as the only velocity through space-time. The empirical GPS clocks' time dilation/twins paradox is resolved by proposing a frame of absolute rest--the three spatial dimensions, and a frame of absolute motion--the fourth expanding dimension upon which ageless photons of zero rest mass surf; which underlie and give rise to Einstein's Principle of Relativity.

When the solution is simple, God is answering. -Einstein

Galileo, Newton, and Einstein: The Heroic Physicists

Time as an Emergent Phenomenon & Deriving Einstein's Relativity from Moving Dimensions Theory's dx4/dt=ic: Traveling Back to the Heroic Age of Physics

In Memory of John Archibald Wheeler

by Dr. Elliot McGucken

MDT's postulate: The fourth dimensions is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at c. MDT's equation: dx4/dt=ic.

Simple, logical proofs of MDT:

MDT PROOF#1: Relativity tells us that a timeless, ageless photon remains in one place in the fourth dimension. Quantum mechanics tells us that a photon propagates as a spherically-symmetric expanding wavefront at the velocity of c. Ergo, the fourth dimension must be expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c, in a spherically-symmetric manner. The expansion of the fourth dimension is the source of nonlocality, entanglement, time and all its arrows and asymmetries, c, relativity, entropy, free will, and all motion, change, and measurement, for no measurement can be made without change. For the first time in the history of relativity, change has been wedded to the fundamental fabric of spacetime in MDT.

MDT PROOF#2: Einstein (1912 Man. on Rel.) and Minkowski wrote x4=ict. Ergo dx4/dt=ic.

MDT PROOF#3: The only way to stay stationary in the three spatial dimensions is to move at c through the fourth dimension. The only way to stay stationary in the fourth dimension is to move at c through the three spatial dimensions. Ergo the fourth dimension is moving at c relative to the three spatial dimensions.

MDT twitter proof (limited to 140 characters): SR: photon is stationary in 4th dimension. QM: photon is probability wave expanding @ c. Ergo: 4th dimension expands @ c & MDT: dx4/dt=ic -from http://twitter.com/45surf

ABSTRACT

In his 1912 Manuscript on Relativity, Einstein never stated that time is the fourth dimension, but rather he wrote x4 = ict. The fourth dimension is not time, but ict. Despite this, prominent physicists have oft equated time and the fourth dimension, leading to un-resolvable paradoxes and confusion regarding time's physical nature, as physicists mistakenly projected properties of the three spatial dimensions onto a time dimension, resulting in curious concepts including frozen time and block universes in which the past and future are omni-present, thusly denying free will, while implying the possibility of time travel into the past, which visitors from the future have yet to verify. Beginning with the postulate that time is an emergent phenomenon resulting from a fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c, diverse phenomena from relativity, quantum mechanics, and statistical mechanics are accounted for and unified with a hitherto unsung universal invariant dx4/dt=ic. Time dilation, the equivalence of mass and energy, quantum entanglement, nonlocality, wave-particle duality, and entropy are shown to arise from a common, deeper physical reality expressed with dx4/dt=ic. This postulate and equation, from which Einstein's relativity is derived, presents a fundamental model accounting for the emergence of time, the constant velocity of light, the fact that the maximum velocity is c, and the fact that c is independent of the velocity of the source, as photons are but matter surfing a fourth expanding dimension. In general relativity, Einstein showed that the dimensions themselves could bend, curve, and move. The present theory extends this principle, postulating that the fourth dimension is moving independently of the three spatial dimensions, distributing locality and fathering time. This physical model underlies and accounts for time in quantum mechanics, relativity, and statistical mechanics, as well as entropy, the universe's expansion, and time's arrows and asymmetries in all arenas.

"More intellectual curiosity, versatility and yen for physics than Elliot McGucken's I have never seen in any senior or graduate student. . . Originality, powerful motivation, and a can-do spirit make me think that McGucken is a top bet for graduate school in physics. . . I say this on the basis of close contacts with him over the past year and a half. . . I gave him as an independent task to figure out the time factor in the standard Schwarzchild expression around a spherically- symmetric center of attraction. I gave him the proofs of my new general-audience, calculus-free book on general relativity, A Journey Into Gravity and Space Time. There the space part of the Schwarzchild geometric is worked out by purely geometric methods. "Can you, by poor-man's reasoning, derive what I never have, the time part?" He could and did, and wrote it all up in a beautifully clear account. . . .his second junior paper . . .entitled Within a Context, was done with another advisor, and dealt with an entirely different part of physics, the Einstein-Rosen-Podolsky experiment and delayed choice experiments in general. . . this paper was so outstanding. . . I am absolutely delighted that this semester McGucken is doing a project with the cyclotron group on time reversal asymmetry. Electronics, machine-shop work and making equipment function are things in which he now revels. But he revels in Shakespeare, too. Acting the part of Prospero in the Tempest. . . " --John Archibald Wheeler, Princeton University, Recommendation for Elliot McGucken for Admission to Graduate School of Physics

Dr. Elliot McGucken's Biography: "Dr. E" received a B.A. in physics from Princeton University and a Ph.D. in physics from UNC Chapel Hill, where his research on an artificial retina, which is now helping the blind see, appeared in Business Week and Popular Science and was awarded a Merrill Lynch Innovations Grant. While at Princeton, McGucken worked on projects concerning quantum mechanics and general relativity with the late John A. Wheeler, and the projects combined to form an appendix treating time as an emergent phenomenon in his dissertation. McGucken is writing a book for the Artistic Entrepreneurship & Technology (artsentrepreneurship.com) curriculum he created.

Please see attached paper!Attachment #1: 4_1_2_wheeler_recommendation_mcgucken_medium.jpgAttachment #2: 2_On_Deriving_Relativity_Entanglement_from_MDTs_Fundamental_Physical_Reality_small.pdf

8 days later
  • [deleted]

Hello Dr E ,

Happy new year ,You begin well this year ,waww .

"cyclotron group on time reversal asymmetry" Could you tell me more please ?

Sincerely

Steve

16 days later
  • [deleted]

Hi Dr. Elliot McGucken,

I ask me some questions about this time.

In logic indeed more we go speedly more our clocks run less.

In this line of reasoning about the velocity of light, It is only possible to go in the future, the problem we can't return at home.

About the past we can't go there but we can see all there.Thus how can we interpret our evolution and its deepest understanding.

I read the work of Peter about the supermuminal phenomenology, I think it is an optic perception of our past with its evolutive parameters seen.

But that seems relevant about a kind of sortings about our laws in the physicality but I doubt about these not coherences and reversibilities if we take our actual moment.Furthermore, let's imagine the law of Einstein about the mass and speed, thus when we accelerate we increase our mass ,thus the quantity of energy is correlated thus that seems a little impossible about the necessary energy. On the other side it is a good road for the checking of energy for the humanity in fact, the velocity increase the mass thus the energy.

Best Regards

Steve

a month later
  • [deleted]

Hello dear M.SAI VARUN REDDY,

It is very very interesting that about the synchronization of the light in an evolutive point of vue with the mass modulator and its intrinsic coded.

It is very relevant , thanks for your conclusion.

Best Regards

Steve

  • [deleted]

Sorry it was mine

  • [deleted]

sorry sir but i was unaware of this fact that this theory was already mentioned by you.but i have a doubt about this theory.since i mentioned the existence of negative dimensional space ( you can see it in the topic COSMIC ORIGINS ) there should be a void of space time graph and hence all mathematical laws cease to operate, then how can the equation( mentioned by me ) can operate under negative dimensional circumstances? i tackled this problem by mentioning that the speed of light is a fundamental characteristic of our universe and hence do not need any mathematical formula to derive it ( we can refer to godel's incompleteness theorem about consistency of certain laws ). what do you think ? do send your valuable replies .

M.SAI VARUN REDDY

  • [deleted]

Hello dear SAI varun REDDY,

Thanks for your answer, my theory is the Theory of Spherisation, a GUT of Rotating Spheres in 3D .....

For the math methods, it is evident that is an important piece for the best extrapolations if and only if the ultim referential and its pure coherent intrinsic laws are harmonized with a big rationality about the serie and its divisibility more the rotation of all around the universal center, the number takes all its sense, this number is finite and the same for 1 quantic system and for our universal spheres inside the universal sphere.

The inconsistency and the incompletness are relevants indeed but we are youngs at the universal scale and thus we have limits.It is not what the problem is not resolvable, not but impossible to resolve.It is totally different and relevant about the difference between the physical universe and its finite system in evolution and on the other side this unknown, behind this walls of perception.

The entropy is bad understood because the utilisations of tools are not harmonized in a sphere and its correct topologic referential.

True or false is not the real question in fact , but true or false about the phyicality is more interesting for a deterministic correlation.

The paradoxs appear when the confusions about the globality and the locality are inserted without realism .

The fact to want to find always contradictions is different than a real doubt about the physicality.

The -, the 0, the infinity in our physicality needs rationality because they doesn't exist simply.

The axiomatization in maths are totally differents than an axiom in physics or natural sciences.There I return about the incompletness due to the evolution, the mass increase, the gravity modulates the rotating spheres and evolves,all that is under the same relativistic laws.

Best Regards

Steve

    • [deleted]

    THANK YOU SIR FOR YOUR COMPLIMENTS. DO READ ON MY OTHER SPECULATION IN THE TOPIC IS THE PAST INFINITE IN THE MAJOR TOPIC COSMIC ORIGINS. BUT I THINK THAT BY PROVING THAT UNIVERSAL GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT AND SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT WHAT HAVE I DONE ?

    M.SAI VARUN REDDY

    • [deleted]

    Hello ,

    I thank you too.

    You know I am young, 34 years old you can say Steve, it is the first time,somebody says sir hihihi

    About the maths, it is indeed frustrating.

    I don't understand why the sciences community interprets the maths like that.

    We can extrapolate but we can't see.But of course for a good extrapolation, the physicality needs a pure respect with the "foundamental laws".

    It is the reason I think for all these actual confusions.

    It is relevant what you say, I have thought too about these points, the spheres and their perfect balance are essential in my model.The singularity is in this equation with these spheres.

    The numbers are fascinatings, the irrationalities evolve towards the rationality in my humble opinion, thus the spherical referential permits the distribution, harmonic.

    The infinities, the irrationalities are for me constants of evolution, the best thus is to utilize them and not to calculate them.

    It is in fact a real universal question, spiritual.

    We are catalyzers inside this physical sphere with incredible tools around us.

    Best Regards

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    Hello ,

    I am impressed by your age.You speak about very relevant things.

    Very interesting.

    The quest of the trut is everywhere, in a flower, a bee, a wind, a brain, a star, a water drop, a photon....and more we search , more we find in fact.

    All has a cause and thus effects, but the cause of the mass is intrinsic , that's why I have invented the rotating spheres implying proportionally mass.

    The time in this line of reasoning since the begining is a pure duration of building.The evolution takes all its sense where the gravity polarises the light.The velocities and the volumes thus permit the different synchronizations between this gravity and this electro magnetism.The gravity in this case is like a modulator of evolution.

    If the space time is linked ,thus it is at the Planck scale I think.

    Friendly

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    Hi M.SAI VARUN REDDY,

    It is very interesting all that.Thanks dear M.SAI VARUN REDDY

    It is likeable.

    You are on the good road, you desire to find , it is the most important.

    The GUT is rational when a theory is correct.All is linked since the begining.

    The better is to find the good equations.

    About the higgs bosons, it is just a synchronization due to the gravitational coded spherical mass.Thus these bosons are just light with a different velocity of rotation, spinal, orbital more the linearity.

    The standard model needs improvement and the synchronization between gravity and electro magnetism is just an evolutive polarisation.

    The secret is in the gravity, it is the gravity which modulated the light.The cause is the mass, an internal cause.

    Friendly

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    Hello ,

    The important point in a whole point of vue is what, the rotating entangled spheres with their specific number are proportionals with the mass.

    The velocity of rotation is the cause of the mass, the gravity in one main sense, the light in the other, that permits to differenciate the gravity and the electro magnetism with these senses.After it is a synchronization of evolution where it exists sortings, synchro.,....the mass increases.

    Friendly

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    Hi ,

    You know what I find very relevant with humility of course.

    The velocity of rotations of the spheres imply a decrease of mass, and the linear velocity increases the mass, thus this two gauges are essentials, more the sense implying the difference between the light and the gravity.

    The mass takes all its sense with this simple fact of rotating spheres with their specific finite number.

    Friendly

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    Hello dear M.SAI VARUN REDDY,

    You can say Steve, it is more cool.hihihi

    I am still impressed because for your age, you speak about general things.

    Sorry for my english ,it is literal.

    You know about your post, I am not a fan of the special relativity.

    I prefer the correlations with the foundamentals, the general relativity, the restr.relativity, the theory of quanta, the theory of fields,and of course the duality wave/particle.

    The gravity and the electro magnetism are on a specific dance of evolution, and the dynamic needs to correlate these foundamentals.

    When you substitute and play with equations, the referential about the real physicality must respect these foundamentals in fact.

    A superimposing thus or an addition must be in this line of reasoning.

    BUT like I said before to Peter about the limit of the speed of the light.

    It is a limit which imply difficulties to check the space between stars for exemple.

    Thus with a point of vue of evolution and its future interactions,that seems bizares this limit of the light.

    But we can check the duration inside a spherical referential, and if we check the linear velocity and the rotating spheres, spinals and orbitals, thus we can check the space.

    If we pass the light speed, and if the velocity of rotation is not checked, thus the mass, and thus the energy can imply very big problems.

    Because the main referential is the Universe and the dynamic is inside this system.

    Now, if the additions imply these effects and the possibility to go at these velocities more important than c, thus a balance with the gravity is essential, because the mass must be checked in this kind of motion.There I return about the sense of rotation and the rule and the effects of these rotations.The electromagnetism and the gravity are linked .

    Thanking you dear M.SAI VARUN REDDY

    Friendly

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    Hello,

    The duality wave particle can be solved by the rotating spheres and their senses and synchronizations in my humble opinion.

    Because the rotations of these spheres imply the mass proportionaly .....linear velocity or the stable gravity.

    The evolution and the increasing of the mass imply that "the gravity has a rule of modulator of evolution" and that to polarize the electromagnetism and its deceleration due to the superimposings of all gravitational system and their centers.

    It is there that the light gauge is essential for the perceptible physicality.

    The maximum linear speed and the maximum spinal speed thus can be encircled for the light, one increases the mass, and the other decreases the mass, thus the duality wave particle is better understood.A little If I said , the light has the two maximum for be just at the limit of the mass due to the sense.

    An important question is the changement of sense when a polarisation is made.Thus at a specific value, the sense changes .

    An other unknown is the maximum velocity of rotation, spinal of a quantum system.

    Indeed, the spinal velocity is different than the linear velocity, thus there we can perhaps go above this limit because the gravity is different than the light due to the time and the sense.

    After the volumes and the synchronizations make the rest in the time.

    Friendly

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    sir Steve thanks for your valuable replies. do tell me about your GUT of rotating spheres someday.

    as for my one of my other speculation. first of all let us name the space in which the inertial frames travel with a velocity that of c as ZETA SPACE - for brevity sake. let us imagine an electromagnetic wave traveling in this space towards an observer. then according to Doppler shift if any wave is traveling towards an observer then it suffers an increase in it's frequency. from the equation of a wave traveling towards a observer,

    n' = n * whole root of [(1 v/c) / (1 - v/c)]

    where n and n' are real and apparent frequencies of a wave respectively and v is velocity of inertial frames. if you substitute v for c then you will observe that n' tends to infinity! now if the wave crosses the observer then according to the equation of a wave moving away from an observer

    n' = n * whole root of [(1 - v/c) / (1 v/c)]

    if you substitute v for c then you will observe that n' becomes zero that is it's time period tends to infinity!

    you can imagine the phenomena that in ZETA SPACE IF A WAVE TRAVELS TOWARDS YOU IN NO TIME ONLY TO BECOME STATIC AFTER CROSSING YOU!

    IF YOU APPLY THIS SPECULATION TO STEPHEN HAWKING'S THEORY IF LIGHT CONES( REFERRED FROM BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME)THEN YOU CAN OBSERVE THAT EACH EVENT IN THE ZETA SPACE HAS NO FUTURE , THAT IS AN END OF TIME TAKES PLACE . THIS HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH TIME BEING UNI DIMENSIONAL .

    M.SAI VARUN REDDY

    • [deleted]

    Hello M. SAI varun REDDY ,

    You are welcome, thanks too for your sharing of ideas.

    It is really incredible, at your age I play soccer hihihih, I searched a little but you are very impressings.

    Happy to know you and to discuss.

    Your substitution and equations are indeed relevants in your line of resoning about the spirituality of the time and the present.

    The light and the time are fascinatings in their constant.(the universal informations take all their sense)and if the system is finite and in evolution thus that facilitates these synchro of frequences....

    Your analyzes are interestings with the zeta espace.Could you tell me more please?

    The fusion(the crossing explained above) what you extrapolate becomes relevant about the informations,

    and thus the synchronization with the rotations of these spheres.

    The modulation becomes very interesting .

    Congratulations.

    ps of course about my theory, what do you want to know about it , you can ask me because my theory is about all centers of interest(maths, physics,chemistry, biology, astronomy, philosophy,universality...)thus you can imagine the difficulty to resume my works.In fact since the age of 17 , I class a little of all(animals, vegetals,minerals,atoms, molecules,amino acids planetsetc etc....., it is like that I have invented, found the universal correlation with sphere.

    I said me wawwwwwww all goes to the sphere,The brain, the eyes, the eggs, the flowers, the fruits, the glands, the elementary particles, the stars, the planets,....thus I said me The universe and our quantum world too.In fact it was logic.After I have inserted a cause of mass and thus the rotation.And a cause of the rotation, an activation coded of these rotations, intrinsic in the main central sphere.

    I see the uniqueness like that....for 1 quantum system, the number is the same that for the number of cosmologicals spheres inside this universal sphere.The serie is finite in its fratalization of the ultim sphere.....

    Friendly

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    Hi ,

    an error of language from me.

    In French we say "La relativité restreinte" et "la relativité générale".

    The word special is used differently in French, thus I said an error for my interpretation of the special relativity which is the same than the Relativité restreinte.

    Of course I like mv²,like I said in an other thread.

    Friendly

    Steve