Perfect Symmetry by Peter A Jackson

Dear Peter,

Could you resume thus the system, please ....

Let's consider our interplanetary system and its center with a rotating system where ions+ - interacts ....voyager 1 voyager2 pineer...our supersonics and the transition subsonics of winds more the wave of the wall choc more the ions interstellars.Let's imagine too the collisions of atoms and the emission of rays of light thus in its pure fractal.

Personally this system is well architectured like a shield and a sorting, the evolution still takes all its sense.

All is rule in fact and the gravity continues to build with the light. For that a specific system is necessary to create the mass. The Universe and its stars produce particles, these cosmic rays are in a dance, the coded gravity sings and synchronizes. If a particle goes above this limit, thus the perceptibility disappears.

On the other side, with a kind of fractal of this velocity, the synchronization takes all its sense. The rest of these ions, are recycled with these BH probably, thus the sense of rotations and the velocities have a main rule about these synchronizations.

I like Einstein when I see the Eistein effects for the mass and the radius...hv...mc²...hv-GmM/r....and the wavelenghts of the rays have an effect correlated with the gravity thus this mass thus these rotating spheres and the universal quantic and cosmological link.

Are you sure about the gravitational effects and the limit of c ...R0/R=photon rec/photon em, thus the photon has a spectral effect ....

Dear Peter what do you think about the Cosmic microwave background please, just curious,hihi

Best Regards

Steve

Hello dear Peter,

I am thanking you for this answer.

It is very interesting.

The system is fascinating during these effects.

I see that like a fractal of the electromagnetism and where probably the dark matter has a rule in these fields and spherical architectures.

The division and the activation seems imply an increase of mass near the main spherical centers like planets for exemple.

The modulations take all its sense, dear Peter, I think the planet Earth and its intrinsic code in the center is very important for the modulations and thus for the synchronizations, the spinals rotations are essentials for those synchronizations and evolution of the mass.

Best Regards

Steve

Dear Peter,

I see you work in engeniering and energy/renewables, you now I have invented several systems in ecology and energy.

For exemple I improve the equations for my sphere of composting, but I am not an engineer, this system is very revolutionary.I add the technics inside a finite volume like a kind of membran ,there I insert the vegetal multiplication and the bacterias....its is very interesting, I have others models too with turbins, pulleyrs,...the add of systems is the key.I need to test and optimize this sphere of composting.

The system needs matters and thus the biomass is essential and the quantity of plants, that's why this system must have an ecosystem around, optimized, improved in its diversity.The cycle is exponential.

If you can help, you are welcome.

Regards

Steve

Hi Peter,

You don't understand me.

I said simply what when this sciences center will be created you are welcome, I don't search monney but skills for the future.You know with or without FQXi or with or without systems ,I will create it.I just must create a good and humanistic base where the people are universalists and real humanists, the rest is not important.

My inventions are numerous, and I am not here to sell them but to improve them for the future applications on ground in difficult localities.It is the aim of this center, to invent, to optimize, to put into practice harmonious models correlated with our balances.

Here is some exemples of my humble inventions which are not to sell !!!!!!!

Powders for soil

natural system of purification of water,

sphere of composting, methan and compost

natural energetic system

models of ecosystems against malaria, fight naturally

optimization of soils

add of energetic systems

Solar system and mirror

pulleys, incompressibility, turbins...

...

I will give these systems for the center and for our fellow men who wait in some parts of this sad planet,it is only simple like that, there I want to unify the scientists, the humanists and the universalists to work above the frontiers, the differences, the monney, the problems...the solutions with our ecosystems are so simple.

I have several models for the big towns too , we must increase the vegetal mass and the micro and macro fauna and flora will continue naturally if some technics are put into practice.

I think the responsability of skills is essential in a global point of vue, universal.

Thus I repeat, if you want and if youare an universalist, you are welcome to optimize what we can optimize, you know I am 34 years old and I must create it ,many friends wait me, they are supers these people everywhere (I knew them by some platforms like Xing or Ecademy , xing is like linkdn, When this center will be created, the synergies with may friends can be quickly made.

This center will produce and will invent what it lacks in fact for NGOs or others, a center of coordination and production is essential.

The fact to increase the mass of the ecosystems with the add of some technics is really a very interesting exponential after x times.

The soil is the key do you know the argilo humic complex, very interesting for the interactions in the soil.

Sincerely

Steve

Hi Peter,

Do you know the project NIF about the fusion, that seems very interesting.

There too the rotation of spheres is the key, the secret for the synchronization.

ps for the 1 per cent and 99 per cent, you know I said that to Florin too, it is the first words at the first page of my method of piano, Hanon method, the best method for the piano furthermore, in fact it is the same, when you study well the bases after you create in harmony with the good notes.But without the studying of the pages and the work to repeat the motions , your fingers don't resist. That is the fact to untie your fingers with just this correct definition 1 and 99 and after it is 100 per cent rational creation...

To be serious a little,are you ok for the center in the future hiihihi let's go dear Peter, let's invent for our fellow men.

Best Regards

Steve

Hello dear Peter,

Thank you very much, you are super, it is nice.

For the pappers, no could you tell me the link

Best Regards

Steve

Dear Peter, ymail or gmail, are you sure for y hihiihi

Dear Peter,

I read and I see better.

You say

"The fine structure of electrons behaves in a similar way to that of protons when accelerated through

the vacuum[4] and no evidence can be found that other massive particles behaves significantly differently,

whether they are accelerated individually or in groups. It appears that the fine structure constant of 1/137th

may only be a constant at rest in the field and increases with velocity. This may be essential for the law of

conservation of energy, the energy used to accelerate the particle increasing the effective mass and oscillation

rate, to reach infinity as 'c' is approached, with particle density at a "saturation" level[7] of some 1013/m-3."

Could you tell me more about this saturation please ?

I understand better Peter the meaning of "...spaces in motion relatively to each other." thus thanks .That seems a good tool to improve the datas.

You say "'As the speed of light can't vary, time and distance must'.

In the 2 senses dear Peter about the time?

You say

"The model also resolves wave particle duality, explaining how the 'photon' waves from Lena Hau's Harvard

lab accelerate instantly back to 'c' using zero energy.

Could you tell me more please?

Regards

Steve

Peter,

I have now read your essay.It was very readable and enjoyable.

My initial thoughts. I am not in agreement with the premise of the essay that- there is nothing to prevent our survival, progress and ultimately finding the whole truth of the universe, other than ourselves and the limits we impose. That does seem to suggest that the reason we survive is because of our technology and scientific knowledge. However the reason we survive is only because conditions on the earth have permitted that survival.

One huge comet impact, one blast from a supernova, one extreme solar event and all higher life forms could be eradicated from the earth. Evolution is not the only influence but chance or luck plays its part too. Coelacanth fish and crocodiles have survived from prehistoric times not because of their exceptional intelligence or technology. It is perhaps those societies not dependent upon technology but with access to abundant natural resources and with sparse population who are most suited to survive and mankind will be culled, as is natural for any species exceeding the carrying capacity of its environment.

The left side of the brain does have an intense need for logic as you say. It is difficult for that mind to accept that ultimately it is chance that we are here and chance that will decide if we survive, not science or technology or politicians or economists. We are not Gods but little insignificant brainy mammals in a vast chaotic universe, and despite all of our self delusion we are still at the mercy of natural forces beyond our control, IMO.

This is a unique stage of human history where computing has made available huge amounts of information from diverse sources but the human being still has available the same number of hours in the day. It is not possible to access all relevant data, read, comprehend and assimilate it. There is therefore selection of what will be paid attention to. This is unfortunate because there are highly intelligent and thoughtful people, from various backgrounds, with good ideas who may not be detected "on the radar". Also ideas that confirm or are consistent with our existing way of thinking are unconsciously given greater preference and reinforce our existing bias. This is not a deliberate decision to ignore and exclude but a consequence of having to be selective so as not to be overwhelmed. Not just by nonsense but sheer volume of data relevant and irrelevant.

There is work under-way to develop computers with the ability to find patterns and correlations within information sources and therefore help in the selection of data from the vast amount available. Perhaps akin to the right hemisphere of the brain that seeks connections and patterns within the whole.This could help enormously by reducing the time it takes to look through existing data and ideas and select that which is relevant and find the connections.

Finally, I suspect that much of the essay was actually a vehicle to gain attention for your idea that explains red shift and various anomalies. I am actually very interested in this, especially if this provides a method of accounting for those anomalies and makes successful predictions as you say. I am sure that current mainstream explanation can not be correct and that there is a valid alternative explanation. I will need to think carefully about your idea and check on some of the examples you give.I thank you for drawing my attention to your work.For now just put me down as one more person out of 6,802,200,000 who has read it.

Hi Peter,

Thanks for these explainations.Interesting about the Bose Eisntein condensate, like what the thermodynamic is universal.

The temperature like all is in a specific equation where all is relatively proportional.

The rotating spheres and their specific number and specificities(volume, mass, velocity of rot(spin or orbital),frequences , oscillations,synchronizations.

In my line of reasoning, the light is an entangled system with the same number but with an other sense thus implying the linearity.These entangled spheres turn and implies a state for the light and a not mass.Thus when you insert a changement of thermodynamical parameters, you change the velocities of rotation of these entangled spheres.Thus of course it is possible to change their linearity because all like I said before is proportional.

The evolution permits to build and to increase the mass thus the gravity.Thus the gravitational systems imply a kind of code for the polarization and the synchronization with the light.Thus the gravity is a parameter of the changement of the rotations of the light spheres.

It is the gravity the intrinsic secret, the gravity synchronizes the light like a modulator of the frequances, thus their rotations.The pression, the volume, the temperature ....are of course interestings for the modulations.

Let's take a tree for exemple, the biological lifes are pure modulators of evolution, all gravitational systems evolve and continue to polarise the light with a fractal of these rotating spheres in their linearity towards the gravitational system and its intrinsic codes of evolution.

Thus if the human parameters change the frequences of this linearity, the real question is this one, what is the rule of this modulation because there the evolution is not the real understanding.We return to a kind of consciousness at this scale of modulation if I can say.

Thanking youn dear Peter

Steve

Georgina

Thanks for your kind comments, just 6,802,199,990 to go. (the right 6 would do!).

You're spot on of course, but the quicker we progress our learning the more chance we'll have of survival/deflecting the asteroid etc.

You're very perceptive. I had indeed got very frustrated that absolutely no-one wanted to even glance at the discovery, all our eminent(ish) physicists, peer review journals no-one! Actualy not true, you'll see above a handful have, the majority are supportive but not influential. A minority are scared of their reputation as it's a bit too off the ruling paradigm.

I've actually given up, twice. Sitting here sipping the Holy grail, while the human race rushes past on the way to it's own demise. It's only guilt and a sense of responsibility that keeps me going! Plus virtually every time I look at another scientific anomaly I find the simple answer staring at me from the chalice!

I need advice Georgina. From someone fresh to the Discrete Field Model. How can I present it in a way that the right people will notice and understand it?

I've been blogging for ages, and most have their noses firmly in their own agenda and, as you say, have no time to learn how to think differently. It seems the word 'inductive' means nothing these days, proof, and the 'scientific method' have little value. We're all crowded down unprovable dead ends entangled in superstrings.

Feynman was right. I think it was in 'The joy of discovering..' He modified Einsteins comment, saying effectively that not only would the right answer be unbelievably simple, but that it would initially appear so different as to be simply unbelievable. (I like that one, - I'll use it again!).

Please throw everything at me you can about the model. I discovered another 'prediction' today that'll need checking; That much of the spectroscopic profile of the 'cosmological background radiation' will match the frequency pattern from the 'photoelectrons' generated in the LHC, with a particular correlation at similar relative velocities.

And Equivalence; Do two photons floating in the vacuum have an equal right to claim they are at rest and it is the other in motion, when one is doing 0.9c in the LHC and the other is in a vacuum flask on top of the duct?

Only if we delude ourselves enough to ignore the crazy frenetic particle cloud around the first!

What is your own field?

What would be the way to most simply convince you?

What bits were you most skeptical about on first reading?

Do you need any more links (paper 3 below)

http://vixra.org/abs/1001.0010 Relativistic GPS Evidence and Quantum Gravity Architecture of the Discrete Field Model.

Best wishes

Peter

Dear Georgina,

It's interesting but your vision of the evolution is false for me.Here is for why.

First the hazard doesn't exist in a global point of vue and furthermore the Universe is not chaotic.If you consider the lifes, these results like just a hazard due to some causal parameters, that will imply confusions about your universal referential and its pure intrinsic and foundamental laws.

These kinds of point of vue are pessimists about the harmonization of the matters and its complexifications and results like lifes, intelligence and consciousness.

If we take this conscious, thus in your line of reasoning, it is just a hazard too.

It is not possible when you analyze all our datas about the taxonomy and the classment of these mass since the hydrospheroid about 3.5 billions years ago and even before when the particles begin their danse of plarisations after this hypothetic Big Bang.

In my humble opinion,All has a rule of complementarity and had a rule of complementarity.If the Megaso-strodon(these first mammalians)have resisted in these difficult periods millions years ago, do you consider these polarisations likes hazards, they have a mass and a code , they were complexs and were predicted thus No?

All the actuals mammalians are from this animal, and if we go more far, the first fishs and before the first cells and before the first proteins and before the NH3 CH4 H2O HCN ..H...Quantum spheres. The time builds since the begining like an universl equation in optimization, complexification, improvement and thus the intelligence is a catalyzer of this reality.

When you study the evolution, you see this universal link between all.

The mass increases and it is easy to see it.

The only complexs are int the biological lifes in 3D.The most incredible secrets are in the lifes and the consciousness.

To beleive what the chaos is an universal reality implies a chaotic perception of the evolution and thus about the results too.

The time is a constant which permits to build....the gravity is coded and polarises the light, like a modulator of evolution and its codes.

The harmony is foundamental for that.The chaos is just a short moment thus a false perception in the whole.The chaos is like a foto dear Georgina, always the harmony will be in the whole in my opinion.

Best Regards

Steve

Steve,

When I say the universe is chaotic I do not mean that it is in a state of complete disorder but highly complex dynamic change giving very complex patterns of order, over which we have no control and can only begin to understand.

I too am amazed at the complexity of forms and interaction that can be observed. I understand the evidence that all life is interrelated and forms have evolved from ancestor forms. However there is also evidence that former states of highly evolved complexity have been eliminated taking the earth back to a more primitive stage. From which new complexity has arisen once more.

There seem to be cyclic mass extinction events which may have terrestrial or cosmic origin. Super volcanoes and comet impacts being two possibilities. There is no way we could prevent the Yellow Stone national park super volcano exploding if it "chooses" to do so. There is very little likely hood that we could deflect an incoming comet from impact. It is just a slightly reassuring idea that it might be possible. There is no reason to assume the universe requires mankind any more than it required any of the extinct lifeforms. It is just anthropocentric vanity. The so called harmony of the natural world of which you speak is the balance of numerous life forms seeking for survival of themselves and their progeny or relatives by competition with other life forms of their own and other species. It is not entirely benign and happy situation as there are winners and losers, survivors and those that do not survive.Cooperation can be overlaid on this basic struggle as it can give a survival benefit for the cooperating organisms.

However even within cooperating groups there are hierarchies with some organisms obtaining more benefit for themselves and their progeny or relatives (or friends who are more likely to reciprocate than strangers), at the expense of other organisms in the group. There are also cheats who exploit the cooperative structure for their own entirely selfish purposes. So the natural harmony is a beautiful illusion. An illusion but beautiful non the less.

Besides the cosmic and terrestrial natural forces there are other reasons why we can not ultimately posses all knowledge of the universe. The size and structure of our brains is probably a limiting factor. We will only discover that of which we can have awareness of and what we know about it will depend upon how we analyse and interpret the data we have gathered. I am sure plenty of arguments against ultimate omniscience were put forward in the essay contest.