Okay, I've got a bit carried away with the air crash investigations. The Hudson river incident was definitely due to a double bird strike. The helios flight had problems immediately after take off from Cyprus, which does have it's own magnetic hill incidentally.
Hi Alan,
I like the idea of the wrap around universe, but perhaps the name wrap around gives it a little bit the idea of the hologram universe, I too use in my essay a fifth dimension that is not "wrapped around" but is reachable as a matter of fact on every point of the space/time placed at the limit of our causal universe the Planck length (see also my last post on the eaasy), you and me like every scientist are struggling with the questions HOW and WHY, the HOW we have a lot of ideas of and the WHY ? Did you ever question yourself why your threads are spinning ? is it the because of same reason that strings are vibrating and are we entering in a math universe at that moment where there is no WHY only LAWS that , and here we go again, are agreed upon bu human beings ?
keep on thinking free
Wilhelmus
Hi Wilhelmus,
Sorry for the delay in replying. I've just scanned your essay again and have appreciated your creative style which seems similar to my own. The "wrap around" universe is necessary to explain the idea of dark energy imo. Particles which convey a force of attraction can travel around a spherical 4D universe to arrive on the 'other side' and mimic a force of repulsion. This is a simple idea yet one which needs plenty of time of contemplation to fully understand. You said "..is reachable as a matter of fact on every point of the space/time placed at the limit of our causal universe" which rang a bell with me and sounded much the same as my image of a wrap around universe in fact. Funnily enough I no longer ask the questions of HOW and WHY. The threads are spinning in the first place because the energy outside the 4D bubble of nothingness which formed within it, is itself spinning and 'chaotic'. Again it's a simple concept and one which may lead some people to ask further questions, but for me it's enough.
I recently completed my personal t.o.e by realising that dark matter is metastable solid metallic hydrogen, created within stars and then expelled during supernova events. I have a hypothesis that some comets deliver this super material to the centre of the Earth which creates an extra supermagnetic effect which is undetectable by normal sensors but can accelerate spacecraft via the flyby phenomena. I can even show that the Bermuda triangle and Nevada triangle are directly linked to two areas in the far east which have similar reputations. It's due to the fall of the dinosaur extinction comet which is still falling towards the center and is now half way into the Earth's outer core.
All the best and thank you for your post. Most apprecaited
Alan
Hi Alan;
I appreceate your "late" reaction,
first :
I doubt very much the "dark matter".(sorry but I agree more with Carlo Rovelli)
second :
You cannnot explain (neither can I) your theory of the spinning of your threads as a matter of fact it is the same problem as with string Theory.
"how" and "Why" are they spinning, in my opinion the HOW and WHY questions are questions that can be posed only in a causal universe, where time is a primairy dimension.
we can exchange space time in Momemtun space and thus :
keep thinking free
Wilhelmus
Hi Wilhelmus
My personal t.o.e has the ability to make predictions though. I believe that tidal forcing of warm equatorial waters to the polar regions becomes reduced during an ice age, which the world is currently heading towards. This extra heat will bring a low level cloud belt to the equatorial regions whilst the polar regions will have extra clear sky sunshine, despite the colder average air temperatures. This is why megafauna was so abundant in northern latitudes during the ice age, they were able to graze on the swathes of fast growing grasses. The high altitudes of the equatorial uplands and altiplano would also bask above the low lying cloud belt and similarly enjoy extra clear sky sunshine as well as an increase in average air temperatures. This is the region of the megaflora which enabled the spider monkeys and others to achieve double 'normal' size, who's remains were found in the TOCA DA BOA VISTA, Bahia state, the longest known cave in the Southern Hemisphere. It all fits
This tidal model with supermagnetism can predict the weather imo. Where I live on the south west tip of the UK, we are receiving less rain annually. This fits with the tidal model. It doesn't fit with the IPCC global warming models though, as far as I'm aware.
Kind regards,
Alan
The latest and final piece of the jigsaw is dark matter comets imo. One must anticipate the fall of Einstein's relativity to appreciate this new angle of enquiry. These anisotropic super-material impacts are the reason for orbital resonance. It would also explain the magnetised lunar rocks and the extra acceleration experienced by the lunar lander which caused it to overshoot it's designated landing site.
I'm convinced that the moon will eventually start to move towards the Earth in it's orbit, which is the origin of the Pervasive Millennial-Scale Cycle in North Atlantic Holocene and Glacial Climates of 1,470 years. This tidal increase will dramatically affect the climate and push warmer equatorial waters towards the poles. This extra energy will have the effect of stirring up nutrients and bringing them to the surface, creating a global wildlife boom.
In conjunction with the ice age tidal increase of Jupiter, I even envisage the lunar tidal increase to divert the warm Pacific current further north so that it passes over the sill of the Bering Strait into the Arctic basin. This is the origin of the megafauna abundance in the high arctic imo. It underpins the timing of the Heinrich events, with the tidal surge and change of current flow undercutting the glaciers and the warmer precipitation leading to flow steams under the ice.
Oops, I should have said "despite the ice age tidal loss of Jupiter..". This shows the huge effect of the millennial cycle and the power the moon has over the global tidal system.
Check out these photographs of the Moon's Craters. The dark comet tidal locking hypothesis would predict a greater number of craters on the side facing the Earth:
Wikipedia:[QUOTE]The two hemispheres have distinctly different appearances, with the near side covered in multiple, large maria (Latin for 'seas,' since the earliest astronomers incorrectly thought that these plains were seas of lunar water). The far side has a battered, densely cratered appearance with few maria. Only 1% of the surface of the far side is covered by maria, compared to 31.2% on the near side. One commonly accepted explanation for this difference is related to a higher concentration of heat-producing elements on the near-side hemisphere, as has been demonstrated by geochemical maps obtained from the Lunar Prospector gamma-ray spectrometer. While other factors such as surface elevation and crustal thickness could also affect where basalts erupt, these do not explain why the farside South Pole-Aitken basin (which contains the lowest elevations of the Moon and possesses a thin crust) was not as volcanically active as Oceanus Procellarum on the near side.
Another factor in the large difference between the two hemispheres is that the near side has been shielded from impacts by the Earth via the synchronous rotation that keeps the far side exposed to impactors coming from outer space.
It has also been proposed that the differences between the two hemispheres may have been caused by a collision with a smaller companion moon that also originated from the Theia collision. In this model the impact led to an accretionary pile rather than a crater, contributing a hemispheric layer of extent and thickness that may be consistent with the dimensions of the farside highlands.[End QUOTE]
This is in contradiction to the reality of more craters on the far side. This can be explained by the dark matter comets passing through the centre of the Moon and causing lava flows on the other side. These buried dark matter comets and their supermagnetic effects could be attributed to their entry crater to give an internal picture of their size, orientation and location as well as the structure and dynamics of the collision.
The photos show slightly more north pole dark matter collisions compared to south pole. This is presumably due to our more southerly position in the Milky Way's spiral arm, the dark matter comets being produced from solar metastable metallic hydrogen released during supernova events.
lol. The Earth has more landmasses in the northern hemisphere which fits with the dark matter comet origins of our continents and also suggests they were made at different times in the distant past. This has huge implications for the dating of rocks and fossils for example.
Edit - of course, more southerly impacts of dark matter comets created magma plumes on the northern hemisphere of the Earth, which created the majority of the landmasses! (Islands such as Hawaii would still have been created by smaller more northerly impact events)
The Scientists figure out our place in the Milky Way but only in a two-dimensional fashion, see diagrams attached. The dark matter comet hypothesis predicts a more *northerly* position compared to the average in the adjacent spiral arms. This is assuming that dark matter comets are MSMH debris released during supernova events.Attachment #1: spiralarm.jpg
This diagram shows our local arm.Attachment #1: local_arm.gif
The dark matter comet hypothesis also fits with the high distribution of small island groups in the southern hemisphere, caused by smaller dmc impact events. The formation of the UK is now open for debate, with the ancient rocks of the lizard peninsula in Cornwall sitting along side younger rocks. The gravity hill on the central Isle Of Man suggests a smaller northerly dmc impact event imo.
The dark matter comet hypothesis also ties in with the work of Shaviv and his Ice Age Epochs and Milky Way Spiral Arm Passages, although I don't agree with all his ideas, the main diagram of ice age epochs with passage through the spiral arms is very enlightening.Attachment #1: ice_age_epochs_and_spiral_arms.jpg
Surely there is now no mystery. The continents were created by the dark matter comet impacts on the other side of the globe. Magma outflows over millennia would have created a series of domes of rock. Erosion from wind and water then sculps them into the jagged ridges we see today. Am I missing something obvious?? The mountain ranges are generally located at the centre of the landmass as expected, as in the case of Antarctica. The Himalayas would have been similarly created. Maybe the Indian plate pushes them up slightly, but that's it.
These domes of magma outflows over millennia are similar to the Deccan Traps in India which were created 60 and 68 million years ago. The dinosaur extinction event by a dark matter comet can now be explained in full.
[QUOTE]The bulk of the volcanic eruption occurred at the Western Ghats (near Mumbai) some 65 million years ago. This series of eruptions may have lasted less than 30,000 years in total..
The release of volcanic gases, particularly sulfur dioxide, during the formation of the traps contributed to contemporary climate change. Data point to an average fall in temperature of 2 °C in this period.
Due to the volcanic gases and subsequent temperature drop, the formation of the traps is seen as a major stressor on biodiversity at the time. This is confirmed by a mass extinction topping 17 families per million years (about 15 families per million years above the average). Sudden cooling due to sulfurous volcanic gases released by the formation of the traps and localised gas concentrations may have been enough to drive a less significant mass extinction, but the impact of the meteoroid that formed the Chicxulub Crater (which would have made a sunlight blocking dust cloud that killed much of the plants and reduced global temperature, called an impact winter) made this one of the most pronounced mass extinctions in the Phanerozoic.
Because of its magnitude, scientists formerly speculated that the gases released during the formation of the Deccan Traps played a role in the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event, which included the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs. The current consensus among the scientific community is that the extinction was triggered by the Chicxulub impact event in Central America.[END QUOTE]
The dark matter comet hypothesis gives the Chicxulub impact event a new burst of high energy which would have caused the Deccan Traps and the release of deadly fumes which engulfed the entire Earth.
The dark matter hypothesis has major implications for the creation of the moon as well. A dmc which passed through the Earth is now a possiblity, with the ejecta on the other side of the globe to the entry point creating the moon. Did the dark matter comet slow down and remain inside the Earth, or did it pass right through and continue on it's journey at a much slower pace, now captured by our sun? The moon's much lower calculated mean density compared to the Earth suggests that the dmc didn't slow enough to form the core of our satellite (if it went right through). Here's a quote from Wikipedia:
[QUOTE]The earliest dated Solar System material was formed 4.5672 ± 0.0006 billion years ago, and by 4.54 billion years ago (within an uncertainty of 1%) the Earth and the other planets in the Solar System had formed out of the solar nebula--a disk-shaped mass of dust and gas left over from the formation of the Sun. This assembly of the Earth through accretion was thus largely completed within 10-20 million years. Initially molten, the outer layer of the planet Earth cooled to form a solid crust when water began accumulating in the atmosphere. The Moon formed shortly thereafter, 4.53 billion years ago.
The current consensus model for the formation of the Moon is the giant impact hypothesis, in which the Moon was created when a Mars-sized object (sometimes called Theia) with about 10% of the Earth's mass impacted the Earth in a glancing blow. In this model, some of this object's mass would have merged with the Earth and a portion would have been ejected into space, but enough material would have been sent into orbit to coalesce into the Moon.
Outgassing and volcanic activity produced the primordial atmosphere of the Earth. Condensing water vapor, augmented by ice and liquid water delivered by asteroids and the larger proto-planets, comets, and trans-Neptunian objects produced the oceans. The newly formed Sun was only 70% of its present luminosity, yet evidence shows that the early oceans remained liquid--a contradiction dubbed the faint young Sun paradox. A combination of greenhouse gases and higher levels of solar activity served to raise the Earth's surface temperature, preventing the oceans from freezing over. By 3.5 billion years ago, the Earth's magnetic field was established, which helped prevent the atmosphere from being stripped away by the solar wind.
Two major models have been proposed for the rate of continental growth:[37] steady growth to the present-day and rapid growth early in Earth history. Current research shows that the second option is most likely, with rapid initial growth of continental crust followed by a long-term steady continental area. On time scales lasting hundreds of millions of years, the surface continually reshaped as continents formed and broke up. The continents migrated across the surface, occasionally combining to form a supercontinent. Roughly 750 million years ago (Ma), one of the earliest known supercontinents, Rodinia, began to break apart. The continents later recombined to form Pannotia, 600-540 Ma, then finally Pangaea, which broke apart 180 Ma.[END QUOTE]
The dark comet core could have passed through the Earth, but it's outer shell of baryonic ice would have been stopped by the crust in the first instance, creating the Earth's first oceans.
Are the Himalayas the 'smoking gun' of this moon forming mega-event?
Wikipedia states: "Earth (or the Earth) is the third planet from the Sun, and the densest and fifth-largest of the eight planets in the Solar System." and "Earth's biosphere has significantly altered the atmosphere and other abiotic conditions on the planet, enabling the proliferation of aerobic organisms as well as the formation of the ozone layer which, together with Earth's magnetic field, blocks harmful solar radiation, permitting life on land."
This suggests to me that the moon forming dmc core stayed within the Earth's interior and was responsible for the early creation of a strong magnetic field. This is the reason the ice/water deposited was able to remain in a liquid state and resolves the 'faint sun paradox'.
And/or greenhouse gases deposited with the water ice.
My latest thoughts:
The faint young sun paradox can simply be explained by incorrect dating for the age of the Earth. If the age of the Earth is much younger than thought, then the sun would indeed be strong enough to allow liquid water to flow on the surface. This dating problem would also resolve the strange suggestion of a supercontinent breaking apart to reform again, only to break apart and reform once more.Attachment #1: Solar_Life_Cycle.png
Sorry, what is the connection between gravity and isotope decay?
[/quote]That might be the wrong way of looking at things. The effect from the impact of a dark matter comet with so much kinetic energy and even when embedded in the mantle still having the ability to churn it into plumes with supermagnetism, are so mindboggling that just a change in the isotope experiment results of humans in the 21st Centuary seems quite minimal.
......
The diagram showing the fossil connection of the southern continents shouldn't be taken as a literal representation imo. Imagine it with landmass in between. I think the dark matter comet struck the Earth coming fom behind the sun in a near miss. This not only pushed up the mantle to create the explosive magma dome and orbital ejecta but also tilted the Earth and would have changed it's orbit, also giving it it's wobble. These values would have been much larger than today presumably. It's this tilt of the northern landmass *away* from the Sun that meant the water froze and so the mountains did not erode as quickly if permantly kept in the deep freeze as well as preventing life from getting a toehold.
The southern landmass had the warmer climate and liquid water flowed. The giant rivers eventually formed the Pacific and Southern Oceans and left the dry land of Antartica, Australia and the rest of the continents. Eventually the tilt receded enough to allow *liquid* water in the northern landmass. Over time these mighty rivers created the Arctic basin and the Atlantic ocean which also enabled warmer water to reach the high latitudes which might have triggered the first ice age epoch.
