Dear Robert,

You repeat the same questions. I gave you a detailed answer already. Your statements about dead-living is non-physical, we talk about existence.

''Does ''nothing'' exist? If ''nothing'' exists then it cannot be nothing, and so it is something - contradiction.

Yes, nothing exist, nothing is zero; Why zero cannot exist? For example, the photon does not age, for the photon time stops, for a photon time is frozen. From this point of view, the photon is similar to vacuum hole - both objects do not age. Does the photon exist? You see, we can observe the objects frozen in time. At the center of a black hole as described by general relativity lies a gravitational singularity, a region where the spacetime curvature becomes infinite; in other words, in a BH time stops and the gravitational length contraction becomes infinite - it is an object very similar to vacuum hole. Do Black holes exist? Vacuum holes are very similar to Black holes; Since BH exists therefore vacuum holes also can really exist.

2) If a hole appears in the Universe then it is filled as soon as possible by particles of environment. However, the speed of motion of these particles is limited by the speed of light therefore the hole's lifetime is non-zero. Meanwhile, we can observe only the real particles which fills the hole. We never can observe the naked hole. The vacuum hole is always dressed by surrounding particles. Since you cannot observe the naked hole then you cannot say if a hole exist or not. We can observe only the real particles that fill the hole.

3) the vacuum holes are very important objects for gravitation. Near the massive body appears a time dilation and length contraction effect. Such phenomenon has the only explanation - the massive bodies emit a flux of holes which curve the spacetime. The vacuum hole is the only ''particle'' in physics able to explain the time dilation and length contraction effect near a massive body. If we increase the concentration of holes it leads to time dilation and length contraction because in the limiting case, when space is composed of holes only, the distance between every two points is zero and time stops.

Sincerely,

Constntin

  • [deleted]

  • Post #92

Dear Constantin,

Remember we limit hole theory to the Universe - one universe rather than a multiverse.

1) Your theory is seriously flawed if you keep ignoring the contradiction that if 'nothing' exusts it cannot be nothing. Why? Because if you remove that contradiction then you have no theory. (Why can't zero apples exist?)

2) The difference between a hole and BH singularity is that their is no mechanism to explain why a hole appears in the first place.

3) No doubt there are non-contradictory theories being proposed by others to explain the effects you mentioned, and much more.

That my friend is why I see no theory in hole theory.

Kindest regards,

Robert

  • [deleted]

  • Post #93

Constantin,

What the #*%@ has Dr. Corda got to do with my discussion with you? Your comment has only demonstrated your paranoia. Also your THREAT regarding Dr Corda publishing my work is noted!

The ONLY reason I began this discussion with you was due to your second essay statement: "Consequently, outside of the Universe is nothing in an absolute sense."

Incidentally, if you are going to use the Wikipedia article on the 'Universe' you should at least be consistent: The universe is immensely large and possibly infinite in volume. Further, there is also the model of a finite but unbounded Universe! Where is your 'outside' now?

Throughout our discussion a "hole" was 'nothing' or 'edge of the Universe', and now all of a sudden it is energy?

Clearly I have been wasting my time, and for that reason end this futile discussion.

Robert

  • [deleted]

  • Post #94

Constantin,

I should thank you for the complement regarding Dr. Corda publishing my paper. But your insinuation of a conspiracy against you is PURE fantasy!

Regards,

Robert

  • [deleted]

  • Post #95

Robert,

You write: ''Incidentally, if you are going to use the Wikipedia article on the ''Universe'' you should at least be consistent: The universe is immensely large and possibly infinite in volume''.

1) I do not state that all information in Wikipedia is true. The Wikipedia tells us about the Modern Science but Modern Science has not yet completed, it is unfinished theory. However, the first proposition in this article is true: ''The universe is commonly defined as the totality of everything that exists''.

2) Do you hope to find all my Hole Theory in Wikipedia? The essay copied from Wikipedia is not original. I created the NEW and ORIGINAL theory and I'm glad that my information is absent in Wikipedia. FQXi requires just ORIGINAL essays but not a copy of Wikipedia.

You write: ''The universe is immensely large and possibly infinite in volume. Further, there is also the model of a finite but unbounded Universe! Where is your 'outside'?''

1) The Universe is finite, please read the universetoday

2) My Universe also is unbounded - the Universe does NOT have the macroscopic bounds! In my finite universe, after having traveled in one direction on it, you can find yourself back to where you started. However, the Universe has the virtual, microscopic ''bounds'' (holes) which forbids the classical motion for microscopic particles only. The holes only can explain why quantum particles do not move classically and don't have trajectories.

3) The real Universe is a mixture of particles and holes. Who is outside and who is inside in this mixture? You see, the notion of ''outside'' is important for the ABSTRACT model of the continuous universe, where I try to introduce holes but not for the real Universe as a mixture of particles and holes.

4) The notion ''outside'' is not the key parameter for my theory; I can define holes as the perfect vacuum without space and time.

You write: ''Throughout our discussion a ''hole'' was ''nothing'' or ''edge of the Universe'', and now all of a sudden it is energy?''

Did you even read my essay? For example, there is a statement: ''Since a hole is able to accelerate particles, it possess action/energy''. In the real Universe a hole have energy, please read about the properties of holes. Theoretically inside of hole is nothing; However, you cannot observe the naked hole; the observer sees the hole as ''something'' because the hole is ''dressed'' by the REAL surrounding particles and the hole has energy.

I can explain how a hole can have energy. Consider a vacuum chamber that has been completely evacuated, so that the (classical) particle concentration is low. Now if we destroy the walls of the chamber then we'll see the implosion. In the same way, if we create the perfect vacuum (a hole) in the chamber, we'll see the implosion because a hole must destroy the chamber quickly. You see, all holes have energy because they are able to accelerate particles and create the pairs particle-antiparticle. In other words, theoretically inside of the hole is nothing but for the observer the hole is ''something'' because one have energy (implosion) and the hole is ''dressed'' by real particles.

You write: ''Clearly I have been wasting my time''

- You don't found any error in this theory. For this purpose, you should read this essay first.

Constantin

  • [deleted]

  • Post #96

Constantin,

I do not want bad blood between us. Perhaps the problem is simply that English is not your first language, and so difficult concepts become confused in the communication.

Thanks to you I am now seeking publication of my own paper, but I do not know if I will be successful.

Neverthelss I wish you all the best.

Goodbye and good luck,

Robert

Dear Robert,

I thank you for the time you took to consider the Hole Vacuum theory.

I wish you all the best.

Regards,

Constantin

Dear Anton,

I do not have time to review all your theory (www.quantumgravity.nl) but I can explain my point of view about the statement ''photon's emission and voyage never can be ''a single event''. Even if you agree about there can be no Absolute Time, nevertheless your example with the photons is based just on the notion of Absolute Time. If the time is frozen for photon, its emission and absorption are different events because these events do not coincide in space and time. If you think that these events coincide in time then you use the notion of Absolute Time because Time flow differently from place to place. Also these events are SPATIALLY separated, consequently both events are different events. In addition, you confuse again the photon's and observer's frames of reference. For example you say ''The symmetry between A's point of view and that of B, that according to A, B changes at the time it emits the photon'' - it is the observer's frame of reference! In general, all your paradoxes appear because you use the photon's frame of reference; Meanwhile, you are the OBSERVER but not the photon. Observers are not able to move with the speed c because it is forbidden by relativity. Besides, photons never violate causality.

Sincerely,

Constantin

  • [deleted]

  • Post #99

It is very difficult to create a 100% creative essay and it is very easy to create a story about physics without any new knowledge in physics. Hence, the creative papers must have advantages concerning essays-stories about physics in our essay contest. If the author tells us about generally known physics knowledge then such essay have the artistic value only.

''you could be 100% creative but 100% wrong''

You are not able to prove that this essay is 100% wrong - for this purpose you must prove wrong the Hole theory of Gravitation, Hole Teleportation and the Hole Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. The Hole theory of gravitation was supported by Soros Foundation and published in mainstream Journals; nobody has found any error in this theory.

Dear Readers,

Please help me to prove and develop the new transportation technology - Hole Teleportation

The Hole Theory has been published in peer reviewed Journals; Hole Teleportation is mentioned in Teleportation Physics Study. According to the theory, the radius of Hole Teleportation is 13 billions light years. The beauty of Hole Teleportation is NO EXOTIC MATTER, which means no messing around with hypothetical methods of creating the stuff. It is the fast and safe transportation technology. I need support to develop this theory. Without support, the Hole Teleportation theory will die.

To start the experimental investigation of Hole Teleportation we should be able to create and detect the holes in spacetime. We can prove (detect) experimentally the existence of holes by help of two atomic clocks. If the atomic clocks placed near the source of holes tick slower then it will be the proof that holes really exist. In addition, we can detect holes by observing the interaction of holes with elementary particles. I have ideas how to create the solid-state generator of holes. It may start the development of new transportation technology based on Hole Teleportation. I'm looking for other methods of detection and creation of holes but I need support.

If you do not support me then you LOSE this transportation technology for next 50 - 100 years; Some scientists have tried to write papers about Hole Teleportation but I have found errors in their papers. I'm the only author who published important papers about Hole Teleportation. If you support me then I will be able to publish important papers about Hole Teleportation.

Please save the Hole Teleportation!

Constantin Leshan

    Our entire future is presently tied to this one, small planet Earth. If a global catastrophe ever befell Earth, whether by natural causes or our own actions, humanity would end. Imagine what it would be like to have another Earth-like planet within our reach. It would be a place where humanity could continue if a global catastrophe ever befell Earth.

    An example is FUKUSHIMA: Radiation Levels In The Ocean Hit A Dangerous New High. The highest yet levels of radioactive iodine-131 were detected in a sample of seawater near the fukushima plant on Thursday morning. Concentration was 4,385 times the legal limit, up from 3,355 times on Tuesday, according to Kyodo. In response, the government has pledged to increase radiation monitoring on land and by sea and to consider increasing the evacuation zone. Imagine that all the Earth is the evacuation zone due to unavoidable disaster, asteroid attack or nuclear poluation. The best illustration of this is the city of Pripyat near Chernobyl in Ukraine, which was abandoned after the nuclear disaster 20 years ago and remains deserted.

    Imagine that all the people on Earth - all 6.5 billion of us and counting, could be transported to another habitable planet in a far-off galaxy. Curently we don't have that kind of technology that all people can be evacuated from Earth where we will go. We need the new transportation technology as Hole Teleportation which is able to send the original body at distance 13 billions light years. For teleportation we must create the holes in spacetime. It is very easy to create holes; for example your computer is a source of holes; I want to create the solid-state generator of holes to realize the Hole Teleportation.

    Perhaps the doomsday asteroid is on its way to Earth (or disaster due to mankind mistakes, nuclear holocausts, climate change, ozone layer depletion, etc. We need the new, fast and safe transportation technology to reach other habitable planet. Please support the Hole Teleportation. To start the experimental investigation of Hole Teleportation we must demonstrate that holes really exist. In my view, the cost of this experiment is ~ 15.000 USD. If we show holes experimentally, it may start the investigation of Hole Teleportation around the world.

    Constantin Leshan

    • [deleted]

    • Post #102

    cute dreamer

      • [deleted]

      • Post #103

      Why do not you create the new teleportation theory? If you try to create a similar theory then you will understand that it is impossible. I am sure that you never created any original physics theory. The envious people like you that deny all new theories (without any proofs) are dangerous for science. Science needs new ideas and theories. People like you can only impede progress and science.

      4 days later

      • [deleted]

      • Post #104

      dreamer

      • [deleted]

      • Post #105

      Do you have any proofs?

      6 days later

      • [deleted]

      • Post #106

      Egal wrote: ''Compact spaces are spaces that can be covered with finite volumes yet they do not need to have an edge or border because you can approach asymptotically to it without never reaching the border such as in open spaces, e.g. the interval (0,1), finitely enclosed length with no edges''

      1) In Hole Theory, the Universe is a mixture of holes, spatial atoms dV and particles. Therefore, this finite in volume Universe yet do not need to have a macroscopic edge and you may travel an infinite path without reaching any border because spacetime is curved by holes. We can call the holes as microscopic ''edges'' because it is the absolute void; Hence, we can call a hole ''edge' because it is not a part of the material Universe.

      2) Compact spaces are mathematical spaces invented by mathematicians. However, the Universe is NOT composed of mathematical spaces. Hence, it is absurd to deny the new physical model of spacetime because it has different properties in comparison with a particular mathematical model. Mathematicians may create the new mathematical model of spacetime with holes and such model will have the microscopic edges.

      3) I can introduce holes without using the notion of edge; for example the holes appear when spatial atoms appear and disappear. Finally, I can postulate the existence of holes as microscopic, virtual parts of absolute void. It is important that holes can explain gravitation and quantum phenomena but not the methods how we introduce holes. Thus, to prove the hole theory wrong you must prove that hole theory of gravitation, Hole Teleportation and my present quantum theory are wrong.

      16 days later

      According to Einstein's General Relativity, ''gravity'' is just another name for the geometry of space and time. Einstein himself said that so far as his general relativity is concerned, space-time and the gravitational field are the SAME THINGS. The Hole Theory meets this requirement - spacetime is made of dV and holes, and gravitation also is a hole phenomenon.

      The Journal Vertical News wrote: "Research from C. Leshan and Colleagues Provide New Insights into Physics

      According to a study from Moldova, ''Matter interacts with space-time holes and emits a flux of ''its own'' holes which curve the space-time; it is a cause of gravitation.'' ''Every planetary body, including the Earth, is surrounded by clouds of holes, which curve the space-time and exert an attractive force on all objects. The vacuum hole is the only ''particle'' in physics able to explain the time dilation and length contraction (the curvature of space-time) by its properties," wrote C. Leshan and colleagues.

      The researchers concluded : "This theory allows creation of artificial gravity by producing holes in the space-time.''

      Since holes can describe the gravitation, inertia and quantum phenomena in the same model, it is the base for future theory of Quantum Gravity. We must create the mathematical model of Hole Theory like Einstein field equations. I have some ideas how to do it and I'm looking for mathematicians for joint work to study the ''Hole version of Quantum Gravity''.

      Constantin Leshan

        • [deleted]

        • Post #108

        Vertical News is not a journal, you cannot be serious trying to justify your research citing an online news website and calling it a journal... Sorry.

        • [deleted]

        • Post #109

        You are wrong, if this is only a dubious news website one cannot even know if the website is run by you, your friends or even family. Of course the opinion value of a third party is as valuable as its own reputation. If you need to make recourse of an unknown web news web page to support your theory with additionally the purpose to make believe people that it is a journal is because you haven't been able to convince any honest scientist, and unlike you, I think there are many scientists, you just have to find a couple respectable ones to endorse your pseudo theory of science fiction.

        Write a Reply...