Dear Anton,

I do not have time to review all your theory (www.quantumgravity.nl) but I can explain my point of view about the statement ''photon's emission and voyage never can be ''a single event''. Even if you agree about there can be no Absolute Time, nevertheless your example with the photons is based just on the notion of Absolute Time. If the time is frozen for photon, its emission and absorption are different events because these events do not coincide in space and time. If you think that these events coincide in time then you use the notion of Absolute Time because Time flow differently from place to place. Also these events are SPATIALLY separated, consequently both events are different events. In addition, you confuse again the photon's and observer's frames of reference. For example you say ''The symmetry between A's point of view and that of B, that according to A, B changes at the time it emits the photon'' - it is the observer's frame of reference! In general, all your paradoxes appear because you use the photon's frame of reference; Meanwhile, you are the OBSERVER but not the photon. Observers are not able to move with the speed c because it is forbidden by relativity. Besides, photons never violate causality.

Sincerely,

Constantin

It is very difficult to create a 100% creative essay and it is very easy to create a story about physics without any new knowledge in physics. Hence, the creative papers must have advantages concerning essays-stories about physics in our essay contest. If the author tells us about generally known physics knowledge then such essay have the artistic value only.

''you could be 100% creative but 100% wrong''

You are not able to prove that this essay is 100% wrong - for this purpose you must prove wrong the Hole theory of Gravitation, Hole Teleportation and the Hole Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. The Hole theory of gravitation was supported by Soros Foundation and published in mainstream Journals; nobody has found any error in this theory.

Dear Readers,

Please help me to prove and develop the new transportation technology - Hole Teleportation

The Hole Theory has been published in peer reviewed Journals; Hole Teleportation is mentioned in Teleportation Physics Study. According to the theory, the radius of Hole Teleportation is 13 billions light years. The beauty of Hole Teleportation is NO EXOTIC MATTER, which means no messing around with hypothetical methods of creating the stuff. It is the fast and safe transportation technology. I need support to develop this theory. Without support, the Hole Teleportation theory will die.

To start the experimental investigation of Hole Teleportation we should be able to create and detect the holes in spacetime. We can prove (detect) experimentally the existence of holes by help of two atomic clocks. If the atomic clocks placed near the source of holes tick slower then it will be the proof that holes really exist. In addition, we can detect holes by observing the interaction of holes with elementary particles. I have ideas how to create the solid-state generator of holes. It may start the development of new transportation technology based on Hole Teleportation. I'm looking for other methods of detection and creation of holes but I need support.

If you do not support me then you LOSE this transportation technology for next 50 - 100 years; Some scientists have tried to write papers about Hole Teleportation but I have found errors in their papers. I'm the only author who published important papers about Hole Teleportation. If you support me then I will be able to publish important papers about Hole Teleportation.

Please save the Hole Teleportation!

Constantin Leshan

    Our entire future is presently tied to this one, small planet Earth. If a global catastrophe ever befell Earth, whether by natural causes or our own actions, humanity would end. Imagine what it would be like to have another Earth-like planet within our reach. It would be a place where humanity could continue if a global catastrophe ever befell Earth.

    An example is FUKUSHIMA: Radiation Levels In The Ocean Hit A Dangerous New High. The highest yet levels of radioactive iodine-131 were detected in a sample of seawater near the fukushima plant on Thursday morning. Concentration was 4,385 times the legal limit, up from 3,355 times on Tuesday, according to Kyodo. In response, the government has pledged to increase radiation monitoring on land and by sea and to consider increasing the evacuation zone. Imagine that all the Earth is the evacuation zone due to unavoidable disaster, asteroid attack or nuclear poluation. The best illustration of this is the city of Pripyat near Chernobyl in Ukraine, which was abandoned after the nuclear disaster 20 years ago and remains deserted.

    Imagine that all the people on Earth - all 6.5 billion of us and counting, could be transported to another habitable planet in a far-off galaxy. Curently we don't have that kind of technology that all people can be evacuated from Earth where we will go. We need the new transportation technology as Hole Teleportation which is able to send the original body at distance 13 billions light years. For teleportation we must create the holes in spacetime. It is very easy to create holes; for example your computer is a source of holes; I want to create the solid-state generator of holes to realize the Hole Teleportation.

    Perhaps the doomsday asteroid is on its way to Earth (or disaster due to mankind mistakes, nuclear holocausts, climate change, ozone layer depletion, etc. We need the new, fast and safe transportation technology to reach other habitable planet. Please support the Hole Teleportation. To start the experimental investigation of Hole Teleportation we must demonstrate that holes really exist. In my view, the cost of this experiment is ~ 15.000 USD. If we show holes experimentally, it may start the investigation of Hole Teleportation around the world.

    Constantin Leshan

    Why do not you create the new teleportation theory? If you try to create a similar theory then you will understand that it is impossible. I am sure that you never created any original physics theory. The envious people like you that deny all new theories (without any proofs) are dangerous for science. Science needs new ideas and theories. People like you can only impede progress and science.

    4 days later
    6 days later

    Egal wrote: ''Compact spaces are spaces that can be covered with finite volumes yet they do not need to have an edge or border because you can approach asymptotically to it without never reaching the border such as in open spaces, e.g. the interval (0,1), finitely enclosed length with no edges''

    1) In Hole Theory, the Universe is a mixture of holes, spatial atoms dV and particles. Therefore, this finite in volume Universe yet do not need to have a macroscopic edge and you may travel an infinite path without reaching any border because spacetime is curved by holes. We can call the holes as microscopic ''edges'' because it is the absolute void; Hence, we can call a hole ''edge' because it is not a part of the material Universe.

    2) Compact spaces are mathematical spaces invented by mathematicians. However, the Universe is NOT composed of mathematical spaces. Hence, it is absurd to deny the new physical model of spacetime because it has different properties in comparison with a particular mathematical model. Mathematicians may create the new mathematical model of spacetime with holes and such model will have the microscopic edges.

    3) I can introduce holes without using the notion of edge; for example the holes appear when spatial atoms appear and disappear. Finally, I can postulate the existence of holes as microscopic, virtual parts of absolute void. It is important that holes can explain gravitation and quantum phenomena but not the methods how we introduce holes. Thus, to prove the hole theory wrong you must prove that hole theory of gravitation, Hole Teleportation and my present quantum theory are wrong.

    16 days later

    According to Einstein's General Relativity, ''gravity'' is just another name for the geometry of space and time. Einstein himself said that so far as his general relativity is concerned, space-time and the gravitational field are the SAME THINGS. The Hole Theory meets this requirement - spacetime is made of dV and holes, and gravitation also is a hole phenomenon.

    The Journal Vertical News wrote: "Research from C. Leshan and Colleagues Provide New Insights into Physics

    According to a study from Moldova, ''Matter interacts with space-time holes and emits a flux of ''its own'' holes which curve the space-time; it is a cause of gravitation.'' ''Every planetary body, including the Earth, is surrounded by clouds of holes, which curve the space-time and exert an attractive force on all objects. The vacuum hole is the only ''particle'' in physics able to explain the time dilation and length contraction (the curvature of space-time) by its properties," wrote C. Leshan and colleagues.

    The researchers concluded : "This theory allows creation of artificial gravity by producing holes in the space-time.''

    Since holes can describe the gravitation, inertia and quantum phenomena in the same model, it is the base for future theory of Quantum Gravity. We must create the mathematical model of Hole Theory like Einstein field equations. I have some ideas how to do it and I'm looking for mathematicians for joint work to study the ''Hole version of Quantum Gravity''.

    Constantin Leshan

      You are wrong, if this is only a dubious news website one cannot even know if the website is run by you, your friends or even family. Of course the opinion value of a third party is as valuable as its own reputation. If you need to make recourse of an unknown web news web page to support your theory with additionally the purpose to make believe people that it is a journal is because you haven't been able to convince any honest scientist, and unlike you, I think there are many scientists, you just have to find a couple respectable ones to endorse your pseudo theory of science fiction.