Quantum information and Cosmology: The connections by Angel Garcés Doz

Dear James: I have read your essay and you target the most important question of science: "Where did information come from to form

our universe from nothing? Does its beginning offer any proof?"

I could respond in many ways, but I think this I offer is of great beauty

The name of God in Hebrew: YHWH, whose numerical value for each of its letters is:

10565 Y=10 H=5 W=6 H=5

This number contains in itself all the features of the universe.

I will give several examples

1) Omega_b = barion density of universe. In my essay I demonstrate the calculation of this value

[math]\Omega_{b}=240-\exp(5+\ln^{2}(2))

[/math]

[math][\exp(\sqrt{3-\Omega_{b}})]\cdot\pi\cdot e\cdot\varphi\cdot\alpha^{-1}=10565

[/math]

[math]\alpha^{-1}=inverse\: fine\: structure\: constant=137.035999073

[/math]

[math]\varphi=(1+\sqrt{5})/2=golden\: number

[/math]

[math]e=that\: is\: the\: base\: of\: the\: natural\: logarithm

[/math]

Zero = infinity

1 and 0, 10 was divided into two (yes, no, one, zero, positive negative: duality) = 5

5 +1 = 6

5 +0 = 5

10565

10+5+6+5=26 ; the famous number of dimensions of string theory

2)

[math]\ln\ln(10565)/10=\sin^{2}\theta_{w}

[/math]

[math]\theta_{w}

[/math]

is the mixing angle electro-weak

3)

[math]2\cdot\ln(m_{Pk}/m_{e})=\sqrt{10565}+(\ln(10565)-9)+\exp\exp-(17/10)

[/math]

mpk= Planck mass ; me = electron mass

17= 1+0+5+6+5

regards

I already read your good essay, and rate it with 7

The fibonacci numbers are more fundamentals that physicists think

A very interesting example: the fine structure constan as a direct function of

The golden mumber, phi; that is:

[{[{(2 x phi^3 - 7)^4}/7] 21}/6 - 3 (163/6)]^-1 137= 137.03599907366175228= inverse fine structure constant at zero momentum

163= 1^2 1^2

1^2 2^2 =5

1^2 2^2 3^2 = 14

1^2 2^2 3^2 5^2 = 39

1^2 2^2 3^2 5^2 8^2 = 103

1,1,2,3,5,8. All consecutive fibonacci numbers divisors

Of 240 ==> group E8

And 1 ==> U(1) , 2 ==> SU(2) , 3 ==> SU(3)

5 ==> SU(5) GUT

[2 x In(mpk/me)] [ alpha^-1] = 240 = Kssing number 8D

Regards

Indeed, it is much more important than what physicists can not even imagine.For example, in the sequence stairstep, which gives the famous number 163, obtained by the algorithm I have given, it can be seen, as I pointed out the results of each stair, and they are:1,5, 14, 39, 103. This sequence has two very important properties:

a) [(1/1) + (1/5) + (1/14) + (1/39) + (1/103)] / Pi + 12 = ln (mh / me)

mh = mass higgs boson = 126.17 Gev ; me = electron mass

b) exp(1)= aprox mpk/m_seven_dimensions ; mpk = Planck mass

exp(5) = mpk/mGUT ; exp(14)= very aprox mpk/sqr(e²/Gn) ; e = electric chargue

exp(39) = very aprox mpk/mVH ( integer part) ; mVH = value equivalent mass Higgs vacuum

exp(103) = very aprox ( integer part ) = mpk/me

c) [(1/1) + (1/5) + (1/14) + (1/39) + (1/103)]-1 = Omega(b) + Omega(dm)

Omega(b) = baryon density; Omega(dm) = density dark matter

d) (1/5²)+(1/14²)+(1/39²)+(1/103²) = 4.585376261 x 10^-2 (very aprox = Baryon density )

Best wishes & congratulations on your great essay

Angel

I wrote in your post essay the links of my work for koide formulas

I am very interesting in read your papers about koide formulas , neutron, proton, electron

I am very excited to read

Thanks very much, dear Antony

Regards

I read his essay and rate it

His essay is a mental prospecting physical sense of the information. I agree with the main points of their development, but for me it is also necessary to translate these ideas into equations correctly describe physical phenomena directly or indirectly observable.

Must always, in any discipline, a deductive-inductive logical analysis, complemented by a physico-mathematical scheme. I wish you the best of luck in the contest. thank you very much for your comment

I left a comment on his excellent essay, which I want to read further.

Also will study his works, you mentioned, in arxiv.

You analyze mainly the relationship, which undoubtedly exists between groups of symmetry, the geometric topology and the quantification of information.

This is the right path to that sooner than later the physicists will have to take if they want to reach a unified theory, even partially.

that should not be forgotten, that it is possible to reach a limit in the acquisition of knowledge, or quantity of information algorithmic computable form, using equations solvable. This is demonstrated, for example, with no computable number, omega, Chaitin.

The space-time-mass has to be quantified, not crossable with lower limits. Only in this way avoids the singularity of black holes, which is not limited due to quantum theoretically, the general theory of relativity.

This same problem is in the ad hoc method: the renormalization of the infinite.

With the quantification, with limits proportional to the Planck mass, Planck length and Planck time, it would avoid the infinite.

As I show in my paper this year, a mathematical theory very basic string already exists in the foundations of quantum theory, I am referring to a string vibrating in a box, which as you know well it responds to the equation:

[math]P=\sin^{2}(2\pi/l)(2/l)

[/math]

The modifications that should be made ​​to this equation are that the factor 2 represents the maximum fluctuation, and the length should be replaced by a dimensionless length, as the ratio between the length d dimensional, relative to the Planck length.

In the case of the Higgs boson equation reduces to:

[math]P(2,l_{7})=\sin^{2}(2\pi/l_{7})(2/l_{7})\cdot246.221202\: Gev=126.177\: Gev=m_{h}

[/math]

Where L7 is the dimensionless ratio lenght Placnk in seven dimensions to Planck lenght, that is:

[math]l_{7}=([2\cdot(2\pi)^{7}]/[(16\pi^{3})/15])^{1/9}

[/math]

In short: the simplest compactification in circles; Kaluza-Klein type

At present, I am studying a demonstration of the Riemann hypothesis. Before publishing it, I want to make, reviewing it intensely.

Humbly, is a demonstration of a beautiful simplicity, which is why I doubt that is correct, despite the fact that, after repeating all steps not find any errors.

I'm working on a reformulation of demonstration, basing on the following property that only has the square root, and why the Riemann zeta function can be expressed by the following differential equation:

[math]\zeta(s)=(-1)^{x-1}\cdot[\cos\{-t\cdot\int2df(x)/f(x)\}\cdot2df(x)+i\cdot\sin\{-t\cdot\int2df(x)/f(x)\}\cdot2df(x)]

[/math]

[math]f(x)=\sqrt{x}\:\: s=1/2\;+it

[/math]

Regards

Missing the summation, apologies

[math]{\displaystyle \sum_{x=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{x-1}[\cos(-t\cdot\int2df(x)/f(x))}\cdot df(x)+i\sin(-t\cdot\int2df(x)/f(x))\cdot df(x)]=\zeta(s)

[/math]

Right now I'm with a lot of work

I read paper on the RH conjecture. very good

The connection of the Hamiltonian with temperature states

From what I know of the Riemann conjecture, you may want, we may already know, the following equation that meet the real part imaginary number, 1/2 + it

[math]\zeta(s)=0\;;\: s=1/2\:+it_{n}\;;\:2\pi n\simeq t_{n}\cdot\ln(t_{n}/2\pi e)

[/math]

I'd love to share with you scientific knowledge, ideas, because our views on mathematical physics are very similar.

No doubt that I will contact you via your email.

Leave some time, at the moment I have a bit complicated life. But hopefully by the end of September, I'll be more liberated.

However, if you want you can send as it deems appropriate to this email address: angel1056510@gmail.com

Thank you very much (do not forget to give it a 10 to his essay.'m Having problems voting. Already have contacted administrators. If you do too, perhaps accelerate this problem)

Now he will comment soon, on other aspects of your last post, on the symmetry of the tetrahedron and their fundamental role in the physical, as well as the utmost importance of number theory in physics, since it is the queen of mathematics .

regards