It’s Fibonacci’s Bit - Seeding the Universe with 0 and 1 by Antony Ryan

The Higgs Vacuum, the Higgs boson, the seven extra dimensions and the fibonacci serie,limited to the five fibonacci numbers divisor of 240, Kissing number in 8d, and the 240 non zero roots of group E8.

mh = Higgs boson ; mVH = value of Higgs vacuum ; me = electron mass

1)

[math]

m_{h}=mVH\cdot P(2,l_{7})=126.177\: Gev

[/math]

2)

[math]m_{h}=mVH\cdot\sin^{2}(2\pi/l_{7})\cdot(2/l_{7})[/math]

3)

[math]246.221202\, Gev\cdot\sin^{2}(2\pi/l_{7})\cdot(2/l_{7})=126.177\: Gev[/math]

4)

[math]l_{7}=3.0579009561..=[(2\cdot(2\pi)^{7})/(16\pi^{3}/15)]^{1/9}[/math]

5)

[math]lenght\,7d\, ratio\: to\: l\, Planck=l_{7}[/math]

6)

[math]\frac{m_{h}}{m_{e}}=246924

[/math]

7)

[math]1\cdot2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot8=240\;240\pm1=(239,241)\,(twin\, primes)

[/math]

8)

[math](8^{6}-5^{6}-3^{6}-2^{6}-1^{6})+(8^{3}+5^{3}+3^{3}+2^{3}+1^{3})-\sqrt{8^{6}+5^{6}+3^{6}+2^{6}+1^{6}}-1..

[/math]

9)

[math]..-\cos\theta_{GUT}=\frac{m_{h}}{m_{e}}=246924

[/math]

10)

[math]\theta_{GUT}=angle\: unification\, theories\: SU(5)

[/math]

Regards for everybody

Dear Antony: yes are one very clear and exact conections from leech lattice in 24d and the Higgs vacuum value, mVH ( ratio to electron mass. The particle less massive and with electric chargue.And absolutely stable)

24d= DIM(SU(7))/2= DIM(SU(5))=4d!

Fn= Fibonacci numbers

240= lattice 8d

[math]K(24d)=196560

[/math]

[math]

K(24d)=\exp({4\pi/3 }+8)-\ln({mVH\cdot{}\sqrt[4]{2}\cdot{}\cos({2\pi/20 })/m_e)

[/math]

[math]

20= \sum_{Fn/240}F_n

[/math]

Regards

Hi Anthony -

Thanks for stopping by my page and reading my essay. Your kind comments were most appreciated.

I only wish we could permit ourselves a more detailed analysis of each other's work - but there are so many works to read, and to rate, in order to make the contest as valid as possible for everyone.

Thanks again, Anthony - and best of luck in the contest!

John

Dear Antony I am very interesting in forms of koide formulas, for stong connections to electric chargue, the mass, and the square root of ratios of masses ( implications of existence of imaginary masses non observables)

Do you like let me read yours papers for this question?

I put here my paper for the masses of quarks obtained in koide form and solely with the sin and cos of Cabibbo angle. The formulas are very simple and very accurate

Thanks!!!

Simple Formulas that Generates the Quarks Masses

Authors: A. Garcés Doz

In this paper we present a very simple formulas that generate the quark masses as a very direct functions sine and cosine of the Cabibbo angle. The accuracy of the results are very big in relation to the latest experimental values.

http://vixra.org/abs/1301.0015

Hi Anthony,

If nothing can escape from behind the event horizon of a black hole, no photons nor gravitons so an outside observer cannot interact with what's inside, then to him all positions within the horizon would be physically identical. Though such a thing is possible in a mathematical space where all points are defined to be identical but for their coordinate numbers, this is impossible in a physical space where different points by definition are different physically, so the diameter of the event horizon cannot be non-zero so a black hole doesn't have an event horizon. I'm afraid that there's something wrong with general relativity, that part of it describes the physics of a fictitious universe (see my post at this thread).

I do, however, agree with your statement that ''It and Bit appear equally fundamental - a sort of ''chicken and egg'' relationship.''

The information as embodied in particle properties (which can be thought of as internalized rules of behavior, the expression of laws of physics) in a self-creating universe must be the product of a trial-and-error evolution. If 'its', particles, particle properties must be as much the cause as the effect of their interactions, of a continuous energy/information exchange, then information only can evolve, become information when molded into material particles and tested in actual particle interactions: only such information survives which enables its embodiments to survive, to manifest themselves as real particles. So you cannot have one without the other indeed.

Best, Anton

Hi Antony,

I like your essay connecting the Fibonacci sequence with information storage in black holes.

The concept of black holes and their link to singularities seems to be shifting these days. My own viewpoint is that there is no singularity and that the entity that is a black hole can be viewed equivalently as a mass with a radius or as a ball of energy with a wavelength. I do not know if this would be of benefit to your thesis, if you think it may check out:

http://www.digitalwavetheory.com/DWT/39_The_Schwarzschild_Radius.html

Thanks for your essay,

Don Limuti

A black hole have not singularity

Singularity = infinite wawe lengths with limit zero= energy infinite

This problem is equal to renormalization metod of quantum

The fusion GR-Quantum will be for quantization of space-time with a minimun length, time and mass

The power evaporation of a black hole and de fibonacci serie

P= (h x c^6)/15360 x Pi x Gn^2 x m^2

15360 = 240 ( K(8d) ) x 8^2

Fibonacci divisors of 240

1+1+2+3+5+8=20

Golden number = Phi

233 = 13th fibonacci number

15360 = (Phi)^20 + (Phi)^-20 + 233

{DiM[SO(7)] + cos(13.04 degree)} x 233= 5120

5120 = integer factor time evaporation equation blackhole

13.04= Cabibbo angle ( quarks)

Regards

Hello Antony,

Your essay is quite intriguing in so far as it attempts to take number relations which are seen to have an actual correspondence in nature, into the more abstract areas of "conservation of information" and the make up of a black-hole. A challenging exercise which should pay off in a discrete universe. I feel I should not comment further without your permission because the Fibonacci sequence can be easily overlaid on Hierarchical Space-Time without resort to "fewer then three dimensions" or "negative dimensions"; I suspect you see this possibility. I also note some interesting comments posted on your essay. Dr. Klingman's position that "transfer of energy" is fundamental to the nature of information is beyond question, but I would say "exchange of energy" allows us to define the relationship between "observer", "observation" and that which is "observed", but then exchange of energy isn't always apparent. John Merryman's insistence that "time is an effect of action" is also fundamental, but I would say that time is observed, and that makes time an effect driven by the exchange of energy, i.e. an exchange of measurements. These factors may help your thinking with respect to entropy and the second law of thermodynamics as they apply to your conception.

One way or the other, well done!

Regards.

Zoran.

I enjoyed your essay Anthony.

It was fun to read and engaging. I think you were a bit imprecise in some of your Physics, or lack a fuller understanding for a more detailed description, but it was a nice job overall. The journey down the Black Hole was great up to a point, but what goes on once the event horizon is crossed could be a little different from what you describe. However; I'm not going to jump in and check. Besides; if I did (and somehow survived!) I could never tell you what I found.

But then again; Fibonacci continues... So maybe my tale would too.

All the Best,

Jonathan