Dear Antoine,

Please see message below from Aug. 3, 2013 @ 19:18 GMT.

It is indeed bold, but as you can see from the comments above, it is quite logical. Thanks for the link over on your thread.

Best wishes,

Antony

Dear Michael,

I noticed the ratings and comment info disappeared yesterday and today when it returned the comments were gone! i hope they manage to fix this. See my comment below from Aug. 3, 2013 @ 19:18 GMT

Annoying isn't it! :(

Thanks I'll repost your comments here too!

Best wishes,

Antony

Michael's post from his blog:

Dear Antony,

Thank you for high rank. Let me imagine a continuation of your n-dimensionality logical game. If rational n-dimensionality ( n = -1,0,1,2,3 and we assume that n is rational number ) is accepted ( i.e. there is a mathematical proof ) we can go further and we may admit a new kind of possible dimensionality, expressed by the square root -1 and complex numbers ( why not ? Einstein and Hawking use the square root - 1 as an imaginary time / complex time variable u in physics ).Hence, new unexpected physical generalizations are deduced.

( copy of my comment for Antony Ryan by 1 Aug 2013 )

Thank you Amazigh,

I agree that nothing can exist without its true opposite. In fact my theory away from the contest has baryon asymmetry occur for such that there is NO missing antimatter and suggests that the true opposite exists as part of every particle.

Thanks for your comments and your super essay!

Best wishes,

Antony

Note: - message below wrote on Aug. 3, 2013 @ 19:18 GMT

Dear Antoine,

Thanks for the link over on your page - I too enjoyed Edwin's essay. It is indeed great to see different approaches to fundamental questions.

My approach is certainly bold, but perhaps tame compared to my theory which partly unifies the four forces and resolves the paradoxes of cosmogony :o)

Anyway thanks and best wishes,

Antony

Dear Antony,

Brilliant essay! Obviously, we cannot agree on everything but i see some similarity in our ideas.

First, KQID Qbit is (00,1,-1) which is singularity Qbit Multiverse in zeroth dimension at absolute zero temperature that computes and projects Einstein complex coordinates (Pythagoras complex triangles or Fu Xi's gua or Fibonacci numbers!) onto the 2D Minkowski Null geodesic and then instantaneously into the 3D in Lm, our Multiverse timeline to allows Existence to move around 360 degree and its arrows of time as you described below. As you also agree below, no information is ever deleted. See my essay Child of Qbit in time. I will rate your essay superb and hope you can do the same. Now my ranking is under the water. Hope you can help, if and only if, you think my essay should be ranked higher. KQID is the only theory out there that can calculate the dark energy of our Multiverse ≤10^-153Pm/Pv and the minimum bits as the lower bound ≥ 10^153 bits in our Multiverse. KQID is the only theory that I knows here that proves bit = it, and KQID calculates Sun lights into Sun bits; calculates electron, proton and neutron in terms of bits; set up equivalent principle of bits with energy and matter. Therefore, Wheeler's it from bit and bit from it. Correct me if I am wrong. Furthermore, KQID is the only theory in this universe has the mechanism on how Holographic Principle works. Also answer the mother of all questions, the why, how and what Existence. As you said in my blog the essay contains too much information. Thanks for visiting my blog and invited me to comment on your original and creative piece of work. I am envious of your high ranking and you deserve it and I shall raise it even higher. I hope you can help to raise mine if only you like my essay.

Pythagoras famously summarized: "All things are numbers." KQID rephrase it that all thing are one Qbit: Qbit is all things and all things are Qbit. Thus, Wheeler's it from bit and bit from it because bit = it.

You explained:

"Fibonacci numbers occur in mathematics as the sums of shallow diagonals in Pascal's triangle, they can be found in different ways in the sequence of binary strings, and are related to the Golden ratio. Every second Fibonacci number is the largest number in a Pythagorean triple.

can be written as a sum of Fibonacci numbers. Fibonacci sequences appear in biological settings, in two consecutive Fibonacci numbers, such as branching in trees [1], arrangement of leaves on a stem, the fruitlets of a pineapple [2], the flowering of artichoke, an uncurling fern and the arrangement of a pine..."

Yes, I agree. "Table 1. "Decay" from VFn to VFn-1 VFn-2 produces an increase of 1 suggesting an arrow of time."

Yes, similarly, this is KQID First Law: "But the sequence 10, 1 reproduces 1, so that information is never destroyed."

Thanks for your comment in my thread and brilliant and original contribution.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

    Dear KoGuan,

    Thanks for the very kind comments. Lots of great points to consider here. It does seem we have common ground. I'll take another look in the context you've set out.

    Thanks for the fantastic comments.

    Best wishes,

    Antony

    All,

    Please take a look at KoGuan's very interesting and relevant paper- It from Bit or Bit from It?.

    Dear Antony,

    Thank You. Let us imagine a continuation of your n-dimensionality logical game. If rational n-dimensionality ( n = -1,0,1,2,3 and we assume that n is rational number ) is accepted ( i.e. there is a mathematical proof ) we can go further and we may admit a new kind of possible dimensionality, expressed by the square root - 1 and complex numbers ( why not ? Einstein and Hawking use the square root - 1 as an imaginary time / complex time variable u in physics ).Hence, new unexpected physical generalizations are deduced.

    Best

    Michael

    Dear Michael,

    I agree that we can indeed use square roots to explore concepts such as this further. I think these could actually apply in experimental results at colliders. Great idea!

    Best wishes,

    Antony

      Michael,

      I've found similar personally too.

      We can see this as a reflection of the baryon asymmetry of the Universe, though I've derived a more precise geometry that gives this result. Also this gives exact entangled spin results that are non-linear, but cosine related matching those found experimentally.

      Also this type of thinking can relate the masses of the proton, electron and neutron to 99.999988% of prediction.

      Kind regards,

      Antony

      Dear Antony:

      I must say that you have lost me. You start from the point that the Fibonacci series begins with zero and one which are the two states of a classical bit. Fine. But what could possibly follow from that? I really do not get what you are saying.

      Cheers

      Olaf

        Dear Antony,

        Congratulations on a clever, novel approach and for an intriguing essay. My one worry is that, although you have a clever mathematical construct, is it really applicable to back holes. There are many more mathematical constructs than physical situations to be explained, and it is not easy to decide which are weeds. On the other hand, it was just such clever playing around with group theory that led to, say, prediction of particle multiplets and an empty hole awaiting the omega-minus particle. The proof of the pudding would be if you were able to make a prediction with this sort of sequencing.

        Cheers,

        Bill

          • [deleted]

          • Post #192

          Dear Olaf,

          Yes 0 and 1 is the start, and in this case the zero applies to the singularity, as being 0-dimensional. Ten 1 apples to 1-dimensional space. That is the fundamental part. We can't be more fundamental than if talking about a singularity and zero dimensions. That's the bottom up part.

          Then I looked from the top down from 3-dimensional space and imagined what happens to any given point in space time. Please not I'm dealing here with spatial dimensions not time.

          As it says in the essay itself, I was envisaging what a point in 3D space does. It observes information and releases information too. All across full 3-dimensions. Tis is empirically known.

          Then at or the event horizon a point might observe information outwards from the BH but not below it.

          Likewise it can't release information outwards.

          So there is a 2-dimensional area that information is both received and revealed.

          Then once inside the BH there are two distinct pathways - one where information can only be revealed, the other only received and these are both 1-dimensional.

          Then the singularity 0-dimensional, where not information can do anything.

          So we have 0, 1, 1, 2, 3.

          Te rest is in the essay including the negative part of the sequence.

          Hope this clears up things?

          Best wishes,

          Antony

          Dear Bill,

          Thanks for the kind comments. I thought your essay was very good and rated it highly. Nice work!

          It ought to indeed be extremely applicable to black holes, as said in the essay, but clarified for Olaf above.

          I'm fact this essay theory only came about as an aside for my main area of work, which has partly unified the four forces and resolved the three paradoxes of cosmogony.

          It's a geometry based also on simplexes which gives natural asymmetry answering Baryon asymmetry and related the masses of several groups of particles very, very well versus prediction.

          For example the electron, proton and neutron to 99.999988% of theory! Further this figure improves with newer results from collider data!

          The theory also could be tested in a computer simulation to give dark matter effects and essentially with very few parameters should simulate out Universe.

          I hope that helps as it really isn't guess work. Save for I haven't fallen into a Black Hole to check, but it also hints at Hawking radiation, as mentioned in the essay.

          We even already expect that pathways verse away from 3-dimensions towards narrower 1-dimensionality.

          Please let me know if you'd like to hear more.

          Best wishes,

          Antony

          Dear Olaf,

          CORRECTED TYPOS BELOW

          Yes 0 and 1 is the start, and in this case the zero applies to the singularity, as being 0-dimensional. Then 1 apples to 1-dimensional space. That is the fundamental part. We can't be more fundamental than if talking about a singularity and zero dimensions. That's the bottom up part.

          Then I looked from the top down from 3-dimensional space and imagined what happens to any given point in space time. Please note - I'm dealing here with spatial dimensions not time.

          As it says in the essay itself, I then went on to envisage what a point in 3D space does. It observes information and releases information too. All across full 3-dimensions. This is empirically known.

          Then at or the event horizon a point might observe information outwards from the BH but not below it.

          Likewise it can't release information outwards.

          So there is a 2-dimensional area that information is both received and revealed.

          Then once inside the BH there are two distinct pathways - one where information can only be revealed, the other only received and these are both 1-dimensional.

          Then the singularity 0-dimensional, where not information can do anything.

          So we have 0, 1, 1, 2, 3.

          Te rest is in the essay including the negative part of the sequence.

          Hope this clears up things?

          Best wishes,

          Antony

          report post as inappropriate

          Again typos - was rushing out:

          In fact this essay theory only came about as an aside for my main area of work, which has partly unified the four forces and resolved the three paradoxes of cosmogony.

          AND

          We even already expect that pathways merge away from 3-dimensions towards narrower 1-dimensionality.

          Antony

          Antony,

          I have read and rated your essay with great interests. Linking Fibonacci's bit with black hole information dynamics is a great idea.

          Have you seen this recent paper about Graphene titled "Black Hole in a Pencil", http://news.sciencemag.org/2006/08/black-hole-pencil ? Perhaps some experiments can be proposed.

          Brian

          Dear Antony,

          Yes, I would like to learn more of your theory. Please give me the link. Again fantastic work! I am happy to enter this contest, I am learning so many wonderful discoveries just from our 3 pounds brain and conversing with these great 3 pounders minds.

          Best wishes,

          Leo KoGuan

          Dear KoGuan,

          I've taken it off viXra as I had some amendments to make, but I could mail something to you. It's quite rough but the basic concept is right.

          Thanks for the interest!

          Best wishes,

          Antony

          Hello Brian,

          Thanks very much for reading and rating. I think I've heard something similar about Graphene so I'll take a look.

          The geometry of my theories even fits and the a symmetric tetrahedral type structure suggests a nascent Black Hole mechanism within Neutron Stars!

          Thanks & best wishes,

          Antony