Dear Amazigh

Your short but intensive essay is to be linked to my ideas of reality.

The dualities you gave are indeed only a grasp of all the dualities that exist in our causal universe. Between all dualities there is energy, the essence of our existence, between birth and death there is LIFE. A battery gives no power when it is empty and both poles have no difference.

The e-duality you introduce I perceive as the qubit reality, in the quantum "reality" a qubit can be both ends of duality , the duality itself is displayed in the Bloch sphere.

So in-between these dualities there is the essence just as I am trying to describe in my essay : THE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCE , which I hope that you can read, comment and rate. I think that you will find there some indications to the answers of the questions you are posing and your comments are welcome.

I hope that you will be able to spare some causal time and give like I did (from 2.8 to 3.1) a rating that is in coherence with your appreciation.

best regards

Wilhelmus

    Dear Wilhelmus,

    Thank you for appreciating my essay.

    If I suppose that the Universe is information. And if I also suppose that the Universe is built from simple to more complex. Which system, to choose, a simple binary, or complex decimal ?

    My answer is clear : the binary.

    I rated your essay.

    Respectfully, and good luck.

    Very important ! Very important ! Very important ! Very important !

    The eUniverse is a whole. A theory which does not consider the whole eUniverse would be unspeakable to claim to be the theory of everything. In physics only, it is possible. But not if it concerns the entire eUniverse.

    The theory is there to gather a largest number of objects and phenomena, in larger and larger sets, and the dream is that only one set, the largest set that can exist and we call eUniverse, that collect all them and so they share the same language of communication, the same principles and laws.

    Can this dream be reached ? My answer is a big YES.

    It is a Theory which would include all other theories because it is a binary Theory, on the basis of the information, and information is the basis of eUniverse, its authenticity, its strength and its source.

    This big Theory, the mother of all the theories, I found it, it is announced now, but it has been a long time since I work above and since I was convinced of my approach.

    And a single concept claims to be able to gather all the fields, all the domains, to apply at every level and all the scales, Its name is eDuality.

    From eDuality will emerge a new science, a new philosophy, and mathematics will be consolidated in their abstract role next to concrete of physics.

    To work, the world needs its both legs, use its both hands, see with its both eyes, and to think, worry about the two contradictory points of view at its disposal.

    Wheeler's dream has come true : "It from bit" ; to me : "It's a bit" ; this Theory such as predicted : A simple Theory to explain a eUniverse so complex.

    I summarize the idea of Wheeler : Finally, it is also simple and we did not even think of it.

    I apologize if the translation is not good.

    Amazigh HANNOU

    Dear Sridattadev,

    Thank you for appreciating my essay.

    Interesting video with prime numbers in DNA.

    Numbers and eDuality are in all things.

    I rated your essay accordingly to my appreciation.

    Respectfully, and good luck.

    Hi Amazigh,

    You wrote: "The first principle that governs the universe is Duality"

    I completely agree with you. This is the conclusion I came to when I first started my theory, it seems so obvious to me now. If you are interested, you can take a look at it here.

    You can also read and rate my essay if you have time.

    Good luck with the contest.

    Cheers,

    Patrick

      Dear Amazigh,

      I enjoyed your essay because of its wide scope - it is refreshing to open the mind's eye and consider the entire Universe, life, philosophy, human activity...and physics. You are happy to find examples of opposites in these spheres, and most of the examples you cited exhibit the quality of dualism of one sort or another, but not all of them. How is reflection the precise opposite of refraction? They are related, but quite different phenomena - refraction is due to a change of speed of light, while reflection is a change of direction (and phase) but not of speed. ! And why is stream the opposite of flow?

      In my Beautiful Universe Theory also found here I have explained why there is no basic duality in my model of physics. Please also look at Eric Reiter's website where he showed that the photon is not a point particle, and that quantum duality (wave-particle) is not basic.

      With best wishes to you.

      Vladimir

        Amazigh,

        I read your essay and just gave it a very good rating. Thanks for visiting my blog.

        I find it and bit do from a duality, be it an ill defined duality, particularly the it.

        Best of luck in this most interesting of events the FQXi essay contest!

        Don L.

          Hi Amazigh,

          I've finally had a chance to read your essay fully. Thanks again for the comments on my thread too. I think that duality is a very important concept too. I think you've touched on a lot, which is what makes it interesting and relevant to the contest. Well done I'll rate it highly. I can see a lot of effort went into this.

          Best wishes,

          Antony

            Dear HANNOU,

            I am sorry in the delay in replying you. I did not check the replies. FQXi also did not inform me. you also did not intimate me

            According to your definition > the 3D printer will not print the object with out using any other material.

            I think we form a picture of anything in our mind, and keep them in our memories. We communicate about that picture to others, which we call information. When we die we loose all these pictures and memories.

            Now in this context, can we create material from information...?

            You can discuss with me later after this contest closes also.

            Best

            =snp

            snp.gupta@gmail.com

            Very important ! Very important ! Very important ! Very important !

            The eUniverse is a whole. A theory which does not consider the whole eUniverse would be unspeakable to claim to be the theory of everything. In physics only, it is possible. But not if it concerns the entire eUniverse.

            The theory is there to gather a largest number of objects and phenomena, in larger and larger sets, and the dream is that only one set, the largest set that can exist and we call eUniverse, that collect all them and so they share the same language of communication, the same principles and laws.

            Can this dream be reached ? My answer is a big YES.

            It is a Theory which would include all other theories because it is a binary Theory, on the basis of the information, and information is the basis of eUniverse, its authenticity, its strength and its source.

            This big Theory, the mother of all the theories, I found it, it is announced now, but it has been a long time since I work above and since I was convinced of my approach.

            And a single concept claims to be able to gather all the fields, all the domains, to apply at every level and all the scales, Its name is eDuality.

            From eDuality will emerge a new science, a new philosophy, and mathematics will be consolidated in their abstract role next to concrete of physics.

            To work, the world needs its both legs, use its both hands, see with its both eyes, and to think, worry about the two contradictory points of view at its disposal.

            Wheeler's dream has come true : "It from bit" ; to me : "It's a bit" ; this Theory such as predicted : A simple Theory to explain a eUniverse so complex.

            I summarize the idea of Wheeler : Finally, it is also simple and we did not even think of it.

            I apologize if the translation is not good.

            Amazigh HANNOU

            Dear Amazigh,

            (Google translate)

            About opposites is interesting that the philosopher George Bosnjak said in its principle of opposites: Everything that has a maximum, has also a minimum.

            I agree with you that the most important principle of duality.

            I also agree with:

            (Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological, economic, political, etc.) but it is too much for one person.

            I wish you much success in this competition and in the writing of the book.

            Regards Branko

              Thank you Antony,

              Your essay is very pertinent and relevant.

              Bits of Wheeler are eDuality that we observe in everything.

              I am writing a book about eDuality that explains all things, even our reasoning.

              You said :

              « By definition, the first two numbers in the Fibonacci sequence are 0 and 1, and each subsequent number is the sum of the previous two. »

              and

              « Both the Fibonacci sequence and Wheeler's foundational question rely upon 0 and 1. »

              I analysed Fibonnacci serie before and find the number « two », and eDuality is at the basis of it, sits at the core of this eReality.

              You are in the right way, continue to developpe the idea of Fibonacci sequence in relation with eDuality.

              Two, couples, pairs, opposites, ... are the bits « 0 » and « 1 » of our eReality.

              The two dimensionalities are everywhere.

              eDuality provides the basis upon which all the Universe is built.

              From the First and Primary Principle (eDuality) we can say significantly : Thing never, absolutely never existed without its opposite.

              eReality is a virtuality, and virtuality is our eReality.

              For me : John Wheeler's dream is eReality.

              « It » from « bit », or « bit » from « It », « It » is a « bit », and « bit » is « It », all have emerged from the same fundamental eReality.

              I also rated highly your essay.

              Having read so many insightful essays, I am probably not the only one to find that my views have crystallized, and that I can now move forward with growing confidence. I cannot exactly say who in the course of the competition was most inspiring - probably it was the continuous back and forth between so many of us. In this case, we should all be grateful to each other.

              If I may, I'd like to express some of my newer conclusions - by themselves, so to speak, and independently of the logic that justifies them; the logic is, of course, outlined in my essay.

              I now see the Cosmos as founded upon positive-negative charges: It is a binary structure and process that acquires its most elemental dimensional definition with the appearance of Hydrogen - one proton, one electron.

              There is no other interaction so fundamental and all-pervasive as this binary phenomenon: Its continuance produces our elements - which are the array of all possible inorganic variants.

              Once there exists a great enough correlation between protons and electrons - that is, once there are a great many Hydrogen atoms, and a great many other types of atoms as well - the continuing Cosmic binary process arranges them all into a new platform: Life.

              This phenomenon is quite simply inherent to a Cosmos that has reached a certain volume of particles; and like the Cosmos from which it evolves, life behaves as a binary process.

              Life therefore evolves not only by the chance events of natural selection, but also by the chance interactions of its underlying binary elements.

              This means that ultimately, DNA behaves as does the atom - each is a particle defined by, and interacting within, its distinct Vortex - or 'platform'.

              However, as the cosmic system expands, simple sensory activity is transformed into a third platform, one that is correlated with the Organic and Inorganic phenomena already in existence: This is the Sensory-Cognitive platform.

              Most significantly, the development of Sensory-Cognition into a distinct platform, or Vortex, is the event that is responsible for creating (on Earth) the Human Species - in whom the mind has acquired the dexterity to focus upon itself.

              Humans affect, and are affected by, the binary field of Sensory-Cognition: We can ask specific questions and enunciate specific answers - and we can also step back and contextualize our conclusions: That is to say, we can move beyond the specific, and create what might be termed 'Unified Binary Fields' - in the same way that the forces acting upon the Cosmos, and holding the whole structure together, simultaneously act upon its individual particles, giving them their motion and structure.

              The mind mimics the Cosmos - or more exactly, it is correlated with it.

              Thus, it transpires that the role of chance decreases with evolution, because this dual activity (by which we 'particularize' binary elements, while also unifying them into fields) clearly increases our control over the foundational binary process itself.

              This in turn signifies that we are evolving, as life in general has always done, towards a new interaction with the Cosmos.

              Clearly, the Cosmos is participatory to a far greater degree than Wheeler imagined - with the evolution of the observer continuously re-defining the system.

              You might recall the logic by which these conclusions were originally reached in my essay, and the more detailed structure that I also outline there. These elements still hold; the details stated here simply put the paradigm into a sharper focus, I believe.

              With many thanks and best wishes,

              John

              jselye@gmail.com

                Dear Amazigh,

                I would like to rate your essay with maximum score but so far I haven't received any information from you regarding comments on my essay. For further details, contact me at, bnsreenath@yahoo.co.in, soon.

                best,

                sreenath

                  Dear Amazigh,

                  Thanks for your rating and I have too rated your essay.

                  Best,

                  Sreenath