Alternative Models of Reality

the tool that I have invented and I work about it to improve the details is the spherical topological geometrical algebras of 3D spheres . The vectors, scalars , trivectors, quadrivectors are considered and the clifford algebras and banach algebras also. The Bott periodicity also is important and links with the lie groups and the K Theory. I have created this tool focused on spheres and so the 3D is the main part of this tool. The operators permit to create the partitions that we want , you can play with 3 spherical volumes , or like in my model the dirac large number is considered and 3 spacetimes , the GR, the DE, the DM. The operators permit topologically to insert properties like the motions, the oscillations, the densities, .....in fact the operators are numerous and you can choose where you insert these operators. That becomes relevant for the isomorphisms,homomorphisms and the homotopies. An other operator topologically chosen is the symplectomorphism preserving the volumes for the deformations. All so is a question of groups and properties, the relevance in my model is the 3 spacetimes superimposed merging creating the baryonic ordinary matter. The informations so are interesting to analyse and the works of Shannon, von neumann, Gibbs can be correlated. A conjecture appears with the strings in considering a pure 3D and these Spheres.

This is a link to a paper I wrote, as it explains how Quantum Entanglement is able to correlate with the formation of Higher Dimensional structures.

https://fermatslibrary.com/p/c8c4da60?fbclid=IwAR1XFbEJsRNy52ujpM0ANDQwtkKlAlcZF_mFmmDD5QjT-ZsH63OnafWCDQo

.......THERE IS A KEY HIDDEN UNDERNEATH THE INVISIBLE ROCK OF TIME...... .....................Theory of Primary Motion, by S. David Coleman ....................

Have you ever tried to find the dimension often referred to as time? Simply by imagining the line, the square and the cube of the three dimensions then looking around for the fourth dimension? I have and usually with no luck. Until one day when I realized that the three dimensional cube . . . was stationary.

Imagine reaching in and twirling the cube. When I did this it felt like I had found something.

Underneath the invisible rock of time is change. But underneath change . . . is motion. The motion that is everywhere, the motion that is in everything. Motion is a key and it can be used to replace time (no need to worry, time can be added back in later, if it's needed).

If we replace time with motion, then space-time becomes space-motion. But most motion is the motion of mass. And hence this theory, that motion-space-mass are one (instead of space-time).

With this theory comes a deeper and simpler explanation of what relativity is as well as an unexpected coherence with the theories of gravity, the accelerating expansion of our universe, quantum physics and classical/Newtonian physics.

.

.

Gravity and the expansion of the universe

When I saw how integral motion was to space and to mass, I had to explore. What is the motion of mass? What is the motion of space?

For mass, surely it was the inward pulling motion of gravity. This brought me to a possibility: what if we were to start with a kind of quantum something, an almost-something/almost-nothing and contract it with the motion of gravity?

Well, it would become condensed, more compact; it would be more like . . . a particle.

And if we did the opposite, expanding the almost-something/almost-nothing? It would become less like a particle, more spacious and perhaps simply . . . space.

Maybe mass and space come from opposite kinds of motion, perhaps even co-creating each other.

If this were the case, instead of mass "having" gravity, it would be the contracting motion of gravity that was creating mass. And it would be the outward motion of expansion that was creating space.

I was surprised by what had just dropped into place.

If this were true, then the expansion of the universe would make perfect sense.

Science finds that the universe is expanding and this expansion is accelerating. Science explains this by proposing that there is dark energy that makes this happen, and that the universe must have started out super tiny and then " banged" its way into being big.

On the other hand, MSM says that space is simply made of expansion. No big bang is needed. And the dark energy is the same energy that is behind all motion (probably relating to the quantum level of things, but I'll get to that later).

Resolving differences

Science has a difficulty with the theories of gravity, relativity, classical/Newtonian physics and quantum physics. Each works well, but they do not all work together. Throwing in dark energy and dark matter only makes it worse.

So When I dropped motion-space-mass (MSM) into the context I was surprised

by how many of their differences it resolved and how many of their quirks it made sense of. It felt like MSM belonged there.

Black holes and relativity

I explored MSM and the extreme gravity of black holes. Here it is quickly obvious that the proportions of mass are quite large to the very small amount of space and with motion that is so reduced that does not even allow light to escape.

In this situation, MSM seems to be in a kind of flux, or an imbalance.

Apparently, more mass means there is less space and less motion.

I then realized that the theory of relativity was saying much the same thing,

except relativity is essentially saying space-time is reduced,

while MSM says space-motion is reduced.

It took a bit for it to dawn on me. Maybe the way motion, space and mass are relating with each other . . . is relativity!

Maybe relativity actually has an effect on more than just space-time.

The more I looked at it, the more I could see that

when any one of the aspects of MSM is greater, the other two aspects are less.

And that it works this way with each of the three aspects.

If this is true, then relativity is actually far simpler and yet more comprehensive.

The edge of space

So does motion-space-mass actually work this way?

What would happen if we tried increasing space instead of mass?

Ok, if there were lots of space, presumably there would then be less motion

and less mass.

The picture I got was the edge of the universe thinning out into space and then

even more space, with almost nothing else there - - kind of the opposite of

a black hole.

The edge of the universe might also have an event horizon that we couldn't see past if the expansion of space accelerated faster than the speed of light.

This was intriguing, but it seemed difficult to know if it was true.

Quantum

And then, what about the other leg of the three-legged stool?

What about lots and lots of motion?

In this situation, it would follow that there would be less mass and less space.

So, what has a bunch of motion (and a lot of interactions from those motions), very little Mass (and little gravity) and very little space (or the tiniest distances).

It was surprising to find that I was describing the quantum level of things.

I had my doubts about this at first, but the more I looked, the more it fit.

For instance:

One of quantum's quandaries is "Why is gravity almost non-existent on the quantum level?" (it's 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000001 less than the other forces!)

The thing about MSM is that it fully expects low mass and low gravity in this motion relativity (or motion imbalance) situation.

I was encouraged to see how well MSM fit here.

MSM also addressed the oddity of how an electron disappears into a cloud of probability. MSM says that this is more motion than mass, that mass just barely exists in this cloud. It could also be said that the distinction between mass and space has nearly disappeared.

Also, "Why do two "entangled" particles interact instantaneously over a distance?" MSM says this is a space problem. Space (distance) just barely exists and is no longer behaving like space.

The molecular level motion (as heat) fits as a transition between

quantum level hyper-motion and our larger, more stable Newtonian level.

Quantum is paradoxical. As I see it, it's everything and everywhere

but it's also right on the verge of being nowhere.

Right on the edge of being nothing.

Resolving quantum

Seeing the quantum level as a motion imbalance meant that the discrepancy of "How can tiny quantum building blocks build an intrinsically different classical/Newtonian physics (macro) universe?" was now resolvable.

MSM says that quantum motion needs space and mass to expand it, individuate it and to balance it out. In other words, quantum motion by itself cannot be a building block at all. It takes motion-space-mass together to build a classical/Newtonian world.

What was becoming more obvious was when one aspect of MSM goes off on a tangent, such as more mass (black hole), or more space (edge of universe) or more motion (quantum level), then classical physics stops working as well.

However, when MSM is in balance, classical physics works quite well.

The energy of MSM

I had to wonder, why would MSM work as a kind of reciprocally flexible relativity? It occurred to me that it would make sense if there were a fixed amount of energy in MSM; when one aspect had more energy, the other two aspects would get less energy - - a kind of E=M+S+M.

Background

I'm not writing this theory out in mathematical or physics terms because I did not arrive at it in this way. I'm not a physicist and except for a bit of astrophysics in college, long ago, I'm not qualified.

This theory arose partially from a different exploration.

For years, I've been looking at my own thinking process, looking at how our concepts are held, how things get fixed into memory.

I saw how memory cannot afford to continually update with every slight change,

which means that our concept of a tree is very unlikely to include every new variation of each fluttering leaf in a light breeze.

This exploration has led to seeing how our concepts, fixed into memory, come across more as "things" or nouns and less like happenings or verbs or . . . motions.

I think this made it easier for me to see time not as a "thing" or a noun,

rather as a concept - - a kind of fossilized concept of motion.

I think it's likely that when we see "time" we're simply seeing the "timeline" of how events are arranged in our memory, much like a series of still photos which must be kept in a specific order for them to accurately represent motion.

This "timeline" becomes a necessary part of the neurobiology of every animal that needs to be able to predict motion.

Time

Our idea of calendar and clock time relates to the most reliable, steady, visible motion we know; one that is common to us all, the motion of the earth.

But I think that what makes the "rock of time" invisible is that it's based on an even steadier, more constant motion, one that is everywhere and is quite invisible to us. And this is the inherent motion (or the compilation of many tiny motions) of the quantum realm. Quantum motion is as invisible, as constant and as ubiquitous as our sense of time is.

Yards and miles can be used to measure space.

Kilograms can be used to measure mass (and gravity).

Time is not used to measure time; hours and days are used to measure motion.

Arrow of time

It is impossible to reverse or duplicate every motion, interaction and resulting change. This can be seen as "the arrow of time". However, some motions and changes are easily reversed, for example, thawing a molecule of water inside a box and then re-freezing it. The motion of the heat flow is reversed and the water is frozen again. Has time has fully or partially reversed inside the box?

When time is seen as motion we find that the "arrow of time" becomes far less absolute.

In a funny way whether time exists outside of our brain or only inside doesn't matter so much; once motion-space-mass is arrived at, time can be added back in if it's needed.

With or without time, MSM works the same way.

Dark matter

So far, I have not found much that scientifically contradicts this MSM theory, but there are a couple of situations where MSM does not just drop into place so easily:

one is dark matter and how galaxies spin.

Science says the outward edges of galaxies spin so fast that the mass there should be flying off and away. The current solution for this problem is a vast amount of an invisible dark matter that provides extra gravity without collecting visible matter where the dark matter resides (mostly surrounding the galaxies).

But, so far, this dark matter can not be found.

This galaxy problem involves mass in motion in a large space,

so it seems like MSM should have a good answer about what's going on.

At one point I thought the expansion of space within the galaxy might shift the calculations of the mass and spin of galaxies. This now seems unlikely to me.

What I wonder is, are mass and space co-creating each other?

If so, then, is mass helping to pull space out, and is space helping to push mass inward?

If this were happening, then the space expanding between galaxies would be pushing against the perimeters of galaxies, pushing them inward.

This same push could be happening on a particle or planetary scale, but would be more noticeable on a galactic scale.

This answer seems a bit contrived to me, and yet it might explain the situation.

Relativity question

Another difficulty brings us back around to relativity

and the spaceship that travels at nearly the speed of light.

Relativity says that this very high speed essentially reduces space-time. (If length contraction and time dilation are seen as one).

MSM says that the speed of light is intense motion which would reduce space and mass.

This brought in a dilemma. Replacing time with motion would mean the motion of the speed of light would be reducing . . . motion! How could this be?

It took a bit to realize that this high speed travel was a single motion,

in a single direction,

which was taking away the energy of other motions, reducing all of them including: expansion of space, contraction of mass, clocks, Muons, quantum motions, etc. That made some sense, but . . .

Science says, when traveling at very high speeds,

mass and gravity would stay the same (even as the inertial or relativistic mass increases)

whereas MSM says, mass and gravity would be reduced.

In my reading and research I have not been able to find any actual experiments done that specify what the gravity of mass is at very high speeds.

So stay tuned. It's kind of a small but crucial point.

Electromagnetic motion

One thing I had noticed was that expansion and contraction were much more

self-referential motions than most other kinds of motions which were primarily interacting with everything around them.

Only recently have I realized that there is at least one other self-referential motion and that is spin.

Spin relates to electromagnetics. It seems likely that MSM could also bring the electromagnetic field cohesively in with the other theories already discussed.

Possibilities

I speculate that our universe might be returning to the

almost-something/almost-nothing, if MSM gets so imbalanced that it breaks down completely (all one element and none of the other two) in the innermost part of black holes and at the very edge of space.

And at the quantum level, I speculate that everything is vibrating4 in and out of

the almost-something/almost-nothing, such that the universe is breaking down

as well as being reborn in a multitude of constant "tiny bangs," as it were.

The mass and space that's lost (in black holes and edge of space) could be

re-entering the universe in this quantum vibration.

Situations where new particles or new hydrogen (or new space) are forming

seemingly out of nowhere or nothing would be an indication of this rebirth.

Could a kind of pre-quantum, pre-mass be the halo of dark matter predicted to be around galaxies? 16 Could mass be entering galaxies in this way?

If so, then are galaxies funneling down into their black hole centers? If so, I would expect simpler elements at the perimeters of galaxies and more complex one at the interiors.

The question arises, what is this almost-something/almost-nothing?

It could be many things; it could be an interface with an anti-universe,

or if E=mc² holds true, it could be pure energy.

This would mean that mass is being converted into energy, a nearly spaceless, massless energy.

If so, then:

Could the bulge at the center of most galaxies be due to this energy pushing outward?

If so, then the size of the black hole should relate to the size of the bulge.

Could the background radiation (that we currently attribute to the big bang) be space converting back into this almost-something/almost-nothing at the edge of the universe?

Could this almost-something/almost-nothing be the same energy that drives quantum motion as well as the contraction of mass and the expansion of space?

I don't know but these are some the possibilities of a MSM universe.

What was underneath?

Did I find fool's gold underneath the invisible rock of time?

Or did I find a kind of secret of the universe?

It's difficult to say, but what sticks with me is -

if it's fool's gold, then why does it explain so much, and so simply?

Why does it bring together so many separate theories, so easily?

Why aren't there more scientific findings that contradict it?

Is this theory true?

It will take more exploration, more referencing and work on the math and physics.

So dare I say it? We'll know. . . all in good time.

Website primarymotion.one (for this theory with references and better spacing)

The author grants permission to copy, distribute and display this work in unaltered form, with attribution to the author, for noncommercial purposes only. All other rights, including commercial rights, are reserved to the author, S. David Coleman (full name Sanford David Coleman Jr.).

THERE IS A KEY HIDDEN UNDERNEATH THE INVISIBLE ROCK OF TIME (For the large perspective of how many theories of our universe fit cohesively together.)

The following is an addition to the theory of Primary Motion that I posted yesterday. This gives the website link and a WORD attachment as well as a PDF attachment. These files are properly spaced and also include references.

Website PrimaryMotion.one

Read. Nicely written.

Read. Nicely written.

Put my comment in the wrong place. I thought this was a repeat. I see it isn't.

Quasi-Dimensionality: An Accidental Blueprint of a Unified Field Theory By: Mykel A. Waggoner

An introduction to Quasi-Dimensional Dynamics

For as long as we can remember, we have been taught to believe that

dimensionality was meant to be organized in a way that is both linear and

hierarchical in nature, even though the tendency to rely on such a system

has led to the stagnation in progress that we have found ourselves in at

this point in time; which is why I am going to suggest that the method

needed to liberate all of us from this predicament, would be to consider

that dimensions are not based on a specific set of possible formations, but

that it is the result of those formations being used to influence the manner

to which our perception will allow for the particular designs that may take

shape to affect what is to emanate from that occurrence. And so, that very

process is going to entail the effect which has always enabled the

development of any dimension: Time. Being that the continuous act of

preventing any further movement from transpiring throughout any

moment that time is prone to doing, so that it can utilize anything

contained with that moment for a certain purpose, will surely function as

the mechanism involved with the construction of any kind of dimension.

That's why we haven't been able to construct dimensions of the fourth

variety and so on; for our approach to doing so was devoid of recognizing

that geometries are formed according to the rate of movement that an

object is able to track and measure from its unique vantage point, with

that movement occurring at such a rate, that the velocity used to ensure

this would mean that a multitude of movements would be able to happen

at seemingly the same instance. Therefore, a tesseract, for example,

would need to have a cube captured in time (framerate), such as that of

being generated through a simulation, and another cube within the same

condition, in order to have the both of them oscillate while overlapping

each other at high enough speeds to produce the effect of seeing each of them as being the same and neither or- thereby explaining why this shape

would consist of possessing several cubes and how that can be done. Yet

the ability to do this wouldn't be limited to that of dimensions beyond the

third, but with the first, second, and third, as a way to make shapes that

aren't conventional by any means. After all, a tesseract is comprised of

multiple cubes, and those cubes are comprised of multiple planes, so

those planes are the byproduct of the axes that were used to make them,

and if the blending of shapes can lead to different shapes, then the same

can be said of the materials contingent to the formation of those shapes,

which would mean that an axis is capable of being more than just a line or

curvature. Hence that of it being feasible to have the bounds that would

constitute for a dimension to become entirely blurred if not completely

removed from having any actual relevance and sustainability to it.

Furthermore, the reason that we haven't realized this any sooner, has

been due to the habitual attempt to fit everything into a single frame, or

to believe that there wouldn't be a way to connect various framerates

together to create an entirely unprecedented infrastructure involving

them, even though animation or movement of any kind is dependent on

this being achievable. Considering that a shape or object of three

dimensions will always require a continuous amount of two dimensional

planes to stack themselves on top of each other in a sense, to create the

effect of depth, which would then allude to the notion of space being both

interconnected and interchangeable with any other representation of

space, and that the formation of space is simultaneously a malleable and

fixed endeavor; which is what the Flower of Life was alluding to: the

development and perpetuation of dimensionality, through the need to

have each dimension, represented as a circle, embody both a sense of

individuality and unification, so that a new expression of such can form

from the process of intersection taking place. All in all, just as the effect of

movement is able to occur because of the momentum being built by the

continuous act of having framerates transition from one to the other, so too does this happen for energy, with the amount of framerates that are

to oscillate per unit of time being the determining factor to how that

energy will function and express itself, along with how much energy as

well. Lastly, I would like to present the idea of multidimensional speed,

which serves to be an extension of the concept of framerates and their

purpose. For starters, the reason that there are even directions available

for dimensions to use for the sake of their formation, is because of the

way that framerates will appear and disappear at their own rates, as

though they were moving to a personal sense of cadence, with there being

so many framerates fluctuating at different velocities that a symphony

would be performed at the quantum level. So in the process of that, an

axis of any variety, whether as a line, curvature, or something else entirely

would stem from causing framerate oscillations to fluctuate at the

necessary rate for several framerates to move coherently in a

synchronized fashion, for if not, there would be the perception of

framerates popping in and out at a seemingly random rate, and at places

that would be unpredictable at best; which means that the intervals used

to gauge the distance in rates between the oscillations of framerates

would have to be consistent with one another, if it's to work- the tempo of

sorts. Suggesting that speed is instrumental to the formation of directions,

and as such, dimensions, because speed itself is in possession of directions

and dimensions of its own; in essence, making this so, through applying

the approach that was previously stated about how to utilize framerates

for the intent of designing tesseracts, to then provide speed with the

capacity to compound its speed until its functionality is operating with a

sense of multiplicity unlike what was known for it to have. Such as the

endeavor of having several cubes overlap each other to produce a

hypercube, the same can be done with speed, in order to make it possible

for any number used to measure the rate of fluctuations taking place with

framerates, to acquire the ability to act as multiple numbers at once, or a

superpositioned number as I prefer to call it. Inevitably granting individual frequencies the means to oscillate at a rate that would allow for the speed

of such to move as if it were to be in the midst of mapping out the entirety

of a shape in real time, all while doing whatever else that the use of the

velocity of the oscillating framerates is being intended for. Or to put it

differently, the speed of the frequency involved with measuring the rate of

fluctuations with the framerates can also be determined by having each

number be treated as though it were vibrating, with that vibration

representing its embodiment as numbers, along with there being

additional numbers for it to be moved to, so as to create a

multidimensionality with the vibrational component of these numbers,

and therefore, the frequencies that will be accessible because of this

phenomenon. Given that the numbers set as coordinates for both cubes of

the tesseract constructed through this method, would have no other

option but to fluctuate as well, even if the numbers were to be the same

numbers for each cube, which proves that these numbers are not only to

induce a form of oscillation, but that all numbers are probably

experiencing that very thing, unbeknownst to most, because the

conditions were never devised to place numbers within the position of

being analyzed in such a way. And with that being said, what to take away

from all of this, is that numbers can have just as much a sense of

dimensionality to them as dimensions can have numbers be applied to

them in a similar form; as the amount of numbers and dimensions that can

form from this will grow into infinitum, because their interdependent use

of each other enables them to have mechanisms to classify all of the

individual variations that can be devised. Although, if a number were to

find itself fluctuating between that of several numbers, all of which are

numbers that are operating under the notion of their preconceived ideas

of structure- the conventional sequence for numbers to have which allows

for the field of mathematics to function in the current way that it is able to

do so- they would need to have their own system to rely upon; which is

why I imagine that numbers like these are also capable of supporting techniques for moving themselves along their specific version of a number

line through using any form of math like arithmetic or algebra to the more

complex varieties of such, in the same way that it would be accomplished

with ordinary or non-fluctuating numbers, just by being willing to be

comfortable with their structure lacking what is familiar to us; even

though we were already introduced to that structure, simply from having

to use the one that we are always involving ourselves with. But I'm sure

that it doesn't seem that way to most, so I'll describe it like this: If all the

numbers that we use, which are rigid and focused into a singular identity,

were to actually be in a constant state of shifting between numerous

expressions of such, then that would mean that the structure of numbers

that we are often using, is without a doubt, arbitrary in its design. And if

that's so, then it would be plausible to consider that the order of anything

is entirely the effect caused by having been exposed to a system with

enough frequency, that the instinctive tendency to predict potential

scenarios or conclusions, as a way to cultivate a sense of trust with that

system, through actively injecting our grasp of its dynamics to whatever is

going on with it, only demonstrates that our desire to adhere to the idea

that any modality, even mathematics itself, is something which is absolute

and infallible, is why we have been able to use it to the extent that we

have thus far. However, the reliance to that methodology has led to

obscuring any chance of recognizing an alternative path. That is, until a

moment when it can be realized that a methodology of any kind is surely

to be settled on the foundation of manufactured continuity, the same way

that any two framerates can technically be positioned near enough to

each other in duration, that the message of their connection would be

conveyed, according to the vantage point of the observer- often at the

expense of that individual being able to catch a glimpse at the

innumerable amount of oscillations conducive to making it feasible for

anything to be perceived, because of the fluctuations needed to have a

line form through the perception of multiple points emanating from that to produce the sight of a line, or a curve being formed through the same

process, just with lines instead of dots, regardless of curves also being

embedded within lines- but I digress. The real evidence to all of this entails

envisioning a curve as a single framerate, with a line being close enough in

position to where the curve would have been, had it been its framerate

which was being utilized at the time, to make it doable to have these

framerates oscillate like a tesseract is being formed, all so that an axis type

that is neither just a line or a curve is usable; yet the proof isn't solely due

to it being existent. It is because a point placed along the path of this axis

type would mean that it is always going to be simultaneously aligned with

a line and curve, as both states are relentlessly in flux; and if that is able to happen, then any axis type, shape, or dimension is exempt from being able

to claim that its formation stems from it doing anything other than that. In

a nutshell, the fluctuation of framerates occurring per unit of time needed

for the formation of any dimension to take place is just like the idea of

there being a dot, a space between that dot, and the dot that is to follow

it, with that space between the dots acting as the symbol and the effect of

the time that wasn't measured; for it's believed that dimensionality is

about finding a way to fit multiple points of perspective next and around

each other, when it's really about discovering the means to do that

through having them overlap each other- like having various axes

intersecting to form a shape. P.S. Although framerates can just as easily be described as frames, like numbers, framerates are defined by the frames

that they are in relation to, which means that they are constantly in a state

of being both a collective and individualized embodiment of information.

Quantum Force Theory

Instead of there being Dark Matter or Dark Energy, it is just as plausible to

consider that the mass of an object will always shift in response to what it

is doing and how it is being affected by its environment. As the mass of an

object will switch into various states of being, as though they were

functioning in accordance to something similar to the binary model,

except with the amount of options for such being greater than just that of

either 0 or 1. And if that particular dynamic is the reason for the seemingly

arbitrary increase or decrease in mass within any specific object, then it

would behoove us to imagine that the phenomenon of Quantum

Entanglement is involved; that the entanglement between multiple

celestial bodies are instrumental to the compounding effect of their

masses, which ensures that their masses will fluctuate as a result of any

difference that might take place within its environment- thereby making

gravity and quantum fields interdependently in reliance of each other. Or

it's just as much likely that all the forces are intertwined with each other

due to Quantum Entanglement as well. So in that sense, it's probably the

case that Quantum Entanglement is the effect of having the wavelengths

of several particles resonate with each other by oscillating the frequencies

of those wavelengths at such a rate that with each passing moment in

time that the oscillation process of resonance is able to occur, the power

of each particle or component of that resonance would be able to grow or

diminish in strength, depending on the rate of that oscillation process,

which means that the force formed and emitted from any particle is going

to be the result of the oscillation process of resonance that is Quantum

Entanglement.

The Meaning of Quantum Entanglement

What most people who are familiar with the concept of Quantum

Entanglement will think about when they ponder the existence of it is that

of the notion of several particles being interconnected to such an extent

that the shift in spin of either one of them will lead to the other particle

being affected in the same manner, instantaneously. But what they aren't

able to deduce from that is the possibility that it's not just the spin that is

being affected, as well as it being feasible that the particle which was

observed as having been affected by the shift in spin from another

particle, then is functioning as an overt, specific, and limited

representation of the effects of Quantum Entanglement, with an

expanded account of its effects being that of any particle having the

capacity to affect any other particle in any particular way, and not just in

regards to its spin. This means that an interaction between any group of

particles is the result of them being entangled with each other; and by

that being so, the process involved with writing code, for instance, is

basically dependent on this being an accurate assessment of the

phenomenon that is Quantum Entanglement, otherwise the programming

of any software would fail to occur in response to this being the way that

it is. And that's because in Quantum Entanglement, information is

immediately shared between several particles through having the spin of

an individual particle lead to the altered spin of another particle. So if such

a thing were to happen, then the effects of repulsion or attraction

between particles, just for example, would suggest that the transference

of data is inherent within the process itself; that just might make it so that

the entanglement of several particles is somehow the byproduct of an

individual particle having an aspect of its frequency vibrating at the

necessary amount to have it be in resonance with the frequency of the other particle that it is affecting, which in turn would have it function like a

GPS device that is honing in on the coordinates of the other particle, with

other ways of affecting a particle being something which stems from a

different part of their frequency being in resonance with each other;

essentially painting the picture of each particle being something which

consists of an entire code within itself, just like any strand of DNA would-

as the particle's equivalent of genes would serve to function as the

determining factor to whether or not another particle will respond to the

initial particle in a specific manner. For it's similar to using a radio in order to have itself tune to the frequency of the radio broadcast, as the

matching of these frequencies between the listener and transmitter is

enough to ensure that the information is able to convey itself, except with

the difference being in the way that the capacity for transmission and

reception is present on both sides. What's also worth noting is that each

particle is not in possession of or embodying just a single frequency, it is

constantly in the midst of hosting a series of frequencies, with one of

those frequencies being the same as the frequency of any particle that a

particle would be able to interact with, and potentially serve to disrupt an

overt case of Quantum Entanglement between several particles, while at

the same time having another one of the frequencies of any specific

particle being different enough to the several particles entangled with

each other to help that particle with shifting the frequency of the

entangled particles, entirely because of the part of the collection of

frequencies of the particle which was different to the overall frequency of

the entangled particles' frequency. I also imagine that the specific way

that each of the frequencies of a particular particle will interact with each

other, in the end is what determines the exact force that a particle will

emit or be affected by; that the difference between forces like Gravity and

Electromagnetism is solely the result of this dynamic occurring within

particles, along with the effect being compounded through entanglement.

So if anyone were to feel inclined to read the full manuscript that this

portion of the publication comes from, then they will be able to do so

through reading the book: Quasi-Dimensionality: An Accidental Blueprint

of the Infinite Improbability Field by the same author as this paper. It is on

Amazon.

One of the biggest error maybe of the sciences community is to consider these photons massless. It seems very odd in fact. Here is why. If the gravitational waves exist, and that these photons are mass less, so it is the motions and impulsions creating these waves contredicting so newton.

But what the thinkers confound is that this GR is for observations. If newton is right, so the gravitational waves are due to fact that these photons simply have a very small mass between probably 10^54 Kg and 10^70Kg and even possibly less still . The error so of theorists to find this Quantum gravitation is to consider the gravitons like the quanta of gravitational waves.

But in fact if the cold dark matter and these photons are encoded in this space vacuum of the DE and are 3D series of spheres , so the quantum gravitation appears simply in respecting the newtonian mechanic.

The main codes are in this DE and is anti gravitational and are too series of 3D spheres probably, and the number is preserved like the volumes of these series, so the densities become relevant. It is simply due to fact that the photons have more energy than mass and the cold dark matter it is the opposite. This reasoning explain this QG but too the antiparticles and a fith force appears. The motions, rotations, oscillations vibrations of these series finite of spheres having the same number than our cosmological serie explain the standard model and the emergent fields and mass of particles.

Einstein was not really false about his GR , it is just that we must improve it and it is just for observations at high velocities , the gravitation is not really a curvature of this space time, but it is true for our observations of this photonic spacetime.

If Newton is right at all scales, so these photons have a mass and also this quantum gravitation respect this newtonian mechanic, we cannot confound observations of a photonic space time with the newtonian mechanic at slow velocities. If they cannot quantify and renormalise this QG with the fields in trying to unify G c and h ,the QFT, the QM, the GR , there are reasons even with all the maths of lie groups or clifford algebras and even with the non commutativity or non associativity. It is simply because the fields and this GR are not the cause of our standard model. And that the gravitons are not the quanta of gravitational waves oscillating specifically inside these photons at this planck scale.

The problem of gluons is very important when we consider this dark matter cold encoded in the space vacuum of the DE. The problem of mass is essential. Even in considering the higgs bosons and mechanism there is a problem of mass, that is why the higgs activate simply a part but does not explain the mass. In fact it is just that these higgs activate a part of the mass that this dark matter has encoded . It is like there is a difference between the mass of this DM at this comsological scale and the mass baryonic simply. If the gluons are linked with the photons encoded and this cold dark matter encoded, so that explains the 98 percent of mass that we need to explain this gluons problem. The problem actually is really the philosophy of this GR like the only one cause with the fields , it is not the case for me, they are just a part of problem, without adding this space vacuum possessing the main codes of this DE and the cold dark matter encoded, we cannot solve the problem.My intuitive equation permits to solve with the 3 spacetimes , E=m(c^2+Xl^2)+Y

Hi Olivier, I try to understand why we have this problem of mass of protons , the actual model explains 2 percent of the mass, the gluons must give 98percent of the mass to converge. I have so considered this DM encoded to explain it.

I d like to know more about your general philosophy of this universe, what are these informations in their foundamentals, what are their origin and what are the particles and fields too ?

"I d like to know more about your general philosophy of this universe, what are these informations in their foundamentals, what are their origin and what are the particles and fields too ? ""

thx for your interest @Steve .. ;:-)

Entropic information is capable of unifying all aspects of our universe at all scales within a coherent and global theoretical mathematical framework materialized by Entropic Information Theory and formulae

information is the code and the code is what creates the process but is itself the process

structure ordered by information storage a

""

life as the storage of the information

and the possibility to updated it by a process of self-learning

to perpetuate that form of information

""

to complete and following this defintion of life

here is the entropic structure concept presented :

- non alive entropic structure

- alive entropic structure

- thinking entropic structure

- Knowing entropic structure (conscious one)

human brain compute but not only

some human brain process can not be computabe as the process of creation or intuition are not computable

it s because creation process is out of algorithmic logic,... because AI will always stay in the algorithmic box created

consciousness is information treated by subject,..

it need subject and object

not the information,

because information can exist by itself

as it is code

and

the code is what creates the process but is itself the process

So Consciousness nor the universe can not be coded

///////

""Mass, energy and movement of information are respectively dark matter, dark energy, and gravity.""

According to this new model, the fundamental physical vacuum at the smallest order of sub-matter, is a superfluid state of pairs of Kramer Weyl fermions constituting dark energy describable by a macroscopic wave function with small fluctuations of the background superfluid, obeying Lorentz symmetry, even if the superfluid itself is non-relativistic.

In condensed matter, the Weyl point is a singular point of Berry curvature which can be considered as a "magnetic monopole" in momentum space [1], considered as neutral massless carriers of information with the nature itself of the information ( or -) corresponding to the helicity, circular polarization (clockwise and anti-clockwise). It is these smaller "granularities", the Weyl points, which are the basis of electromagnetic waves and condensed matter, as well as dark matter.

The origin of the charge in the symmetrized equation of Maxwell [2] is in first instance Gravity which comes from the movement propagation of the monopole itself. The propagation of the monopole movement following specified orientation (sign in the symmetrized equation), is an eccentric propagation characterized by the logarithmic spiral based on the gold section [3] depending on the true nature of the process involved by the structure itself, loss of entropy: anticlockwise; gain of entropy: clockwise. Moreover, the ideal geometric container representation of the propagation geometry is a double torus; so here are presented the mathematics reasons of all nature phi and vortex structures at all scales of our universe explaining the physical causes underlying the complete gravitational process of our universe across all dimensional orders

(5) (PDF) Entropic Information Theory. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356378350_Entropic_Information_Theory [accessed Dec 02 2021].

Zeeya and FQXI Community:

A long time in the works, with many false starts unfortunately reported as "complete," and still, perhaps, a work in progress, the following webpage highlights work done in service of a "new" vision of macroscopic quantum entanglement, while paying respects to David Bohm and his vision. The forecasting section, if it is viable, owes its inspiration to Michael Talbot's book, "The Holographic Universe." If the forecasting algorithm is not viable, we still feel we may be on to something, and request the help of those willing in the FQXI Community to flush out, accept as complete and viable, or vote "Quash," with grounds for their vote. The website contains numerous forays into other topics, and the reader is, obviously, are free to explore.

Thank you.

-Deserdi Chapas

DESERDI.xyz Website

hello to all,...

im here to present to you a alternative model of reality,that can be right...

Entropic Information Theory: Bits from Bit

as nature love OCKHAM razor, i can explain the simple bases of this model in this regard,...

Information is code

and

code is what creates the process, it is itself the process.

Mass, energy and movement of information are respectively dark matter, dark energy, and gravity.

Entropic Information formulas are able to unifying all aspects of the universe following the common base element : the information.

with this formulae

ln(W) =( action)/h = tОЅ = mtcВІ/h = (k(b) T lnвЃЎ(2)t)/h = (m l(P)ВІ)/(h t(P)) =A/(4l(p)ВІ)= (m G)/(2ПЂcВіt(P) ) = (m G)/kcВі = 2ПЂRmc/в„Џ=4ПЂGmВІ/в„Џc = mв€љ(G/2ПЂch)

general relativity and quantum mechanics are reconciled by introducing quantum gravity for Planckian scale.

with that formualae вЃЎ 4ПЂGmВІ/в„Џc

i have all the mathematics and demonstrations to go with

if the quantum mechanics and the wave functions are predicted with probabilities of measurements and that inside this ensemble we have hidden variables, so that contredicts Bell, but it is total non sense considering different values of a hidden variable because it is under the actual measurements under our actual proofs about this QM.The distinction that they made with the ensembles cannot be actually found because if these hidden variables exist they are not under these actual wave functions . It is against th statistical analysis and the Bell theorem in violating the determinisn of our actual system of measurements. The hidden variable could exist but are not in our actual spectrum of analysis and is not about the wave function because these waves and their ensemble must respect the foundamentals.They can try to prove their ideas with a system of measurements, that will not give an answer because simply it is beyond all this actual system , its statistics and the wave functions. Their error is to affirm that it is measurable in an ensemble just because they have chosen to tell it in fact. They want so with an invention to differenciate the ensembles and so they want to create these hidden variables somewhere in the states of space, and Hilbert is not the problem, the statistics yes and probablities of measurements.

It is not possible for the measurements , detectors or computations because we have simply these limitations .All their ideas are against the causality and locality under our actual foundamental parameters of observations, measurements and probabilities and statistics of our wave functions. They can tell all what they want with ensembles different and mathematical tools , they don t violate Bell simply.

Charlie, Debbie, Alice, Bob or peter paul jacques shall not change the observations and measurements and it is not about the interpretations of each observer but about pure quantum rational results.

in fact if ensembles exist with hidden variables, they are actually beyond our actual knowledges and they dont interact with the actual wave functions simply , so they cannot be measured, nor computed nor observed because it has nothing to do with our actual physics. Our physics are emergent from deeper logics yes but that does not contredict Bell in the sense that we have a system of measure superdeterministic with our actual tools simply

if thinkers want with our actual system disproves Bell, so they must explain the cause and not with these wave functions.

I consider hidden variables but not in the actual ensemble of wave functions, and furthermore it is probably stable hidden variables having acted before our measurements, so not possible.

Our actual standard model is a result of evolution, we have these baryonic matters like a result of a cause and they have fields and waves , and so when we measure them we respect the superdeterminism and Bell , if we have hidden variables, so they are before this creation of this baryonic matter and we don t know how and where still. All this to tell that our actual baryonic matter and our actual wave functions are stable systems under specific superdeterministic waves, fields and properties , you cannot change them. Furthermore imagine we want to explain this consciousness with actual hidden local variables, it is not possible because 1 we have farer cause in our satandard model and secondly it does not come from fields of this GR .

If my reasoning is correct about the spheres and the universe. We have 4 main finite systems , the photons made of series of spheres, the cold DM too , the DE spacevacuum for the main codes and informations and the baryonic matter due to the 3 others merging. And we have a fith probably system in 0D for the infnite eternal consciousness. The universe seems simple generally. The quantum series have probably the same number than our cosmological series of 3D spheres, oddly it approaches the dirac large number. Actually we observe this GR and a part of our standard model but we need to go farer and deeper about all this.

A thing interesting is that if the universe has chosen these 3D spheres like primarty essence, we have a kind of superfluidity for the 3 ethers, it is interesting about the contact when we aply specific series and volumes. The waves and fields are emergent from the motions rotations oscillations of spheres 3D.

The philosophy correlated is a little bit different than the strings, my works are an assumption but the strings too are an assumption, we need to know more, I believe that we could prove these spheres maybe with the ricci flow and the 2 other ethers and the poincare conjecture.

The fact to superimpose the 5 systems with the spherical topological geometrical algebras can be very relevant, alone I cannot solve all, I know that the thinkers have difficulties to change their philosophy and that these strings are an institution and the GR alone too, but my humble reasoning can coverge and complete the puzzle.

STRUCTURE FORMATIONS OF BIOMOLECULES

We study a Nano-Structural 4-dimensional New Atomic Model, mainly for biological elements on the basis of Super Unified Theorem SU(11)вЉѓSU(6)Г--SU(3)Г--SU(2)Г--U(1), that means, up-converting quantum masses or quantum dot's positions or points have been consider as four coordinates, such as x = v1t; y = v2t; z = v3t; and v4t, a pseudo co-ordinate due to optical holographic energies assuming the General Atomic Structure of Matter Atom influencing by exotic matter fluids and providing forces by new energy sources of SU(6) in the respective framework of SU(6)Г--U(1), where U(1) created magnetic monopole(once created never destroyed), hence there created a new kind of electromagnetic force with current within the GUT model of SU(5)вЉѓSU(3)Г--SU(2)Г--U(1). This new model is likely the extension of Rutherford's or Niels bohr's Atomic Model.

In this new model assuming some new kinds of quantum particles in wave status created firstly from the exotic matter fluid by maintaining the entanglement of wave-wave duality. The formation of mass actually done by the resonating vibration of new energies (explained details in my published articles), resonating energies then appeared like as boxes or packets or bunches of high energy frequencies of short wave lengths. Hence found, new kind of different particles by quark-type but lepton-likes are tightly bindings by the bosons of the strong forces of SU(6), then other particles forming by exchanging bosons of SU(6) into bosons of SU(5). In GUT theory, we observed tightly binding by different quarks & gluons, forms different kinds of new particles of matter atoms, some of them not visible practically but confirmed at laboratory. We found then molecules, monomers then polymers etc. under the network of new kind of electromagnetic force. Again, light energies of incoming information or consciousness within the resonating boxes are the main indicator of life formation and thereafter of everything. This new kind of laser light like focussing beams appeared with different gradients forces, optimising its potentiality behaving holographic optical tweezers then trapping nano-particles. Therefore, encapsulated quantum dots and up-converting nano-particles, we found then different elements, compound elements etc. of ordinary matter atoms and continuing its resonating vibration "mode" for fabricating the structure formations of different complex bio-molecules like DNA's, Proteins etc. also then creating catalyst for accelerating the system thereafter.

Relativistic Expanding Mass (REM) Model

Overview

by Ted R. King Jr

rabbitwhole.com

The Illusion of Gravity

Another crackpot theory by an outsider? Einstein was a crackpot outsider--until he wasn't. Even if this model gets soundly falsified that would spare all of us from wasting any more time on it. So far this looks very unlikely. Exploration and refinement are called for by those who are qualified and enchanted by the possibilities.

Here is an alternative interpretation of gravity that addresses some widely acknowledged fundamental flaws in General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory that prevent their unification.

Like many in the physics community I strongly suspect the interpretations of our core experimental data need some fundamental adjustments. Here is an elegant, single postulate one that simplifies almost everything.

REM Postulate:

All mass is expanding, deforming the adjacent aether which is expanding enough slower to agree with General Relativity.

Newton's inverse square formula, contrived to match Kepler's geometric data, appears to be an ad-hoc construction to interpret gravitational mass as generating spooky action at a distance exactly equalling the inertial mass defined by his brilliant 2nd law by figuring out a gravitational constant fudge factor, G, to make them match. He admitted he, like we, had no idea of the nature of gravity to justify this interpretation, but it stuck because in his day there were no other plausible explanations. An expanding Earth would never have occurred to his generation, only force could move things, and his gravity as force equation, along with his 3 famous laws has endured to this day as the foundation of physics for it's predictive power, but, as Newton admitted, not for illuminating our understanding of the nature of reality. To this day the prevailing opinion is that nobody really understands gravity.

Einstein established beyond reasonable doubt that mass curves (actually deforms) space and time, and there is no such thing as gravity. Why have generations of top physicists, including Einstein himself, been beating this dead horse to no avail trying to quantize gravity to play nice with QFT?

What if Newton's 2nd is all we need? What if all mass is inertial mass? What if we don't fall to Earth, but Earth expands to run into us at 9.8m/s2. What if we are just non-accelerating inertial mass with no measurable spooky force at a distance to push us down and the only measurable force is upward against our shoes? That seeds a massive rapid phase changed physics and unblocks the road ahead.

Too outrageous? The only force when you drop an accelerometer is an upward g force on the dropper. Think about it. Is gravity the only exception to Newton's 2nd law?

This is no more outrageous than Einstein's crackpot (until it wasn't) relativity theory. There is no limitation on how far inflation can inflate in what we currently hypothesize is an infinite, flat, fixed density, inflating universe. Only the REM version of inflation applies to all mass, which is just confined energy, even at the subatomic scale, and to a deformable by adjacent mass or accelerating charge in a resurrected Luminiferous Ether which, being deformable, also propagates light. Einstein's spacetime "curvature" with the REM interpretation should almost all still agree with accepted experimental data, with no need for impossible singularities or negative gravity. At last, a visualizable model not only for "gravity" but for relativity as well! This moves the quest to understand physical reality to the exploration of the nature of the aether and the genisis of particles therein. This is worth serious exploration.

Einstein also showed us that mass in motion distorts spacetime, which can thus be treated as some kind of compressible "fabric" that propagates light, such that an observer in a compressed frame measures proper distance and time and thus light speed as c, and a less compressed observer "sees" the compressed rulers and time as shorter and slower. Thus the REM interpretation of the equivalence principle renders the laws of physics, except for now dethroned gravity, the same in any frame, accelerating or not. The only so far recognized evidence of this inflation is what we call "Gravity." Even unaccelerated mass in motion with respect to the local fabric would distort it accordingly and no observer could tell the difference any more than in Einstein's closed elevator model. That includes Michealson-Morley type experiments. Einstein's fabulous equations would still have mass telling spacetime how to "curve" and spacetime telling mass where to go, and the proper vacuum light speed would still be the same in any frame because rulers and clocks would accommodate to local compression.

How can the REM model be tested?

To be determined, of course, but the one obvious test is done every day all over the world when any object is allowed to free fall to Earth. It really is in free fall, "feeling" no 2nd law force (as would be measured by an accelerometer), and therefore no 3rd law opposition. Another major clue is that, neglecting air resistance, objects of different masses released from the same height hit the ground simultaneously. This is very strange since the other known forces described by QFT accelerate in their respective fields according to charge magnitude. Expecting the "gravity" field to act likewise fails as objects fall at the same rate regardless of mass.

ALL mass is inertial mass in the REM model, which solves the mystery of why "gravitational" mass equaled inertial mass.

Some Possible Implications to Explore

Black holes without singularities, just expansion at light speed running into the Schwarzschild radius. No need for singularity driven Big Bang .

Dark matter and dark energy explained by continuous creation which is required for constant density in an expanding universe.

The expensive, fruitless search for the graviton is finally put out of its misery

Deeper understanding of the "fabric" of space-time possibly leading to some parametric characterizations illuminating quantum theory and enabling first principle derivations of fundamental constants

Refiguring Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model

It seems so far that ultimately all mass is confined light in a single field with "particles" formed by topological wave interferences in confined space.

Faster then light warp drive by localizing and directing enormous bundles of energy

The role and roll of consciousness in the nature of reality - think about it as you wiggle your pinky!

We will never come close to understanding the nature of reality without delving deeply into the nature of consciousness. It is already clear that all human creations originated in human minds, and as yet no instance of the emergence of consciousness from matter has been reported. There is no valid reason to discard the idea that all of physical creation originates in consciousness, and not vice-versa. This accords with the most revered and enduring wisdom of the ages.

Two hints: time and space are human creations! There are unlimited realms of consciousness with a new one created at every point of selecting one alternative over another. Think parallel universes and unimaginable, to us, forms of consciousness!

There are more things in heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in our fledgling science.

Ted R. King Jr.

2-7-22

Thinking about superdeterminism:

For a model based on a non-associative algebra, might it be possible to ascribe the phenomenon of quantum measurement/collapse to its non-associativity. Between measurements particle trajectories would be deterministic, but, because handings and order of algebraic operations could differ for different points of observation, calculations of trajectories between events would be ambiguous. As a result, any attempt to predict events could only be probabilistic. Events would be loci for which calculations for all points of observation generate a consistent but not necessarily identical result, some latitude being possible subject to limits imposed by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Loci with inconsistent results would be occupied by ``quantum foam". A theory based on this approach may require application of the principles of chaos theory.

This thought was prompted by the way in which the pattern of particles of the standard model can be found within the subalgebra structure of a non-associative quasi-group.

See viXra.2203.0014v1