Dear William B Goodwin,
You present a very interesting theory that is different from the mainstream theory of the universe. I like original ideas. You conclude: "Here probably the 'a-biological world' learned from the Universe and subsequently the physical systems learnt to pursue the goal of reproduction and formed the "Biological world". Slowly these biological life forms acquired intelligence and now trying to understand Universe! That way probably the goal-oriented behavior is a physical or cosmological trend of the Universe......."
..............Reply...................
Yes Thank you for your liking my essay and nice encouraging comments
Thank you for visiting here
...............
Your words..........
.........................
While you have already replied to other commentators on the brief connection between the content of your essay and the question of intent for this essay, I too would have liked to hear more on the connection between the two. I know that the page limit makes it difficult to explain the Dynamic Universe Model and to explain the connection to aims and intent, but in the future revision of this essay I wish that you would give more depth to the connection.
..............Reply...................
I am reproducing the parts of the essay below for you to comprehend easily ......
.... Intent.....
'..... 1.1 About Dynamic Universe Model: In our Dynamic Universe every mass is moving in a direction and goal determined universal gravitational force (UGF) as the indomitable resultant vector of gravitational forces acted by all the other bodies in the Universe. This UGF is not constant force acting in only one direction. This resultant UGF vector force is varying according to ever varying dynamic movements and positions of all the masses in the Universe from time to time. In Dynamic Universe Model, this UGF is the fundamental concept; this model calculates this force "UGF" from moment to moment using its mathematical laws on each and every mass in the SITA simulations. In this way many present-day unsolved physics problems were solved. This method is different from conventional two body problem solution.[10]......'
This UGF sets the goals for every Galaxy or for every mass..
...... Reproduction......
Galaxies take birth in different times and quench (die) in different times in different directions. But the positioning of Galaxies is not random, they will come to a stable 'Dynamic Equilibrium' positions due to UGF is the main theam.
Probably you may have a look at the points given by FQXi as guidelines...
This essay is related to COSMOLOGY, This essay is, Original and is entirely different from all the previously published papers by author, It is unpublished. It is Technically correct. This essay covers the long-term, large-scale goals. This essay addresses questions such as:.............
* How did physical systems that pursue the goal of reproduction arise from an a-biological world?
Relevance:.. Universe is having Galaxies, which take birth and death is happening. In the Cosmos the biological world is also a part in which is reproduction is taking place. The same thing is happening in the Galaxies. In this essay this reproduction ability is emphasized.
* What general features -- like information processing, computation, learning, complexity thresholds, and/or departures from equilibrium -- allow (or proscribe) agency?
Relevance:.. Computer simulations were shown to support the paper.
* How are goals (versus accomplishments) linked to "arrows of time"?
Relevance:.. Here Goals were created by the Mathematics of Dynamic Universe Model in the form of Universal Gravitational Force (UGF). This UGF is the total resultant force on any mass ( here in this case the individual Galaxy) which decides the path to be followed in the next instance. That is how the time is pulling every Galaxy..
* What separates systems that are intelligent from those that are not? Can we measure this separation objectively and without requiring reference to humans?
Not Addressed...
* What is the relationship between causality - the explanation of events in terms of causes - and teleology - the explanation of events in terms of purposes?
Not Addressed...
* Is goal-oriented behavior a physical or cosmic trend, an accident or an imperative?
Relevance:.. Here the goal-oriented behavior is a physical or cosmic trend.
Many papers and books were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe
With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.
Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain
Additionally you may please have a look at the CONCLUSION of the essay.
For me character count came as problem
I will revise the essay in near future and upload it to viXra ASAP
...............
Your words..........
.........................
Early in my career I learned to be cautious about interpreting the results of simulations. Would the results of your simulations change if you allowed for black holes?
..............Reply...................
This is not a General relativity type solution. Solves many problems which GR can not solve.
Dynamic Universe model is a mathematical frame work that can be applied to different sets of masses. It is an General N-body problem solution with out singularities.
In the simulations of Dynamic Universe Model, I will have to give the value of masses in Kg and their distances in Cartesian XYZ co-ordinates in meters, Many times I take the origin (0,0,0) as Center of Sun; But it can be center of earth, or center of Galaxy or center of molecule which depends on the problem.
Black holes I can not give, as it is infinite density. If there is an error of Blackhole, the COMPUTER stops as it gets "1/0" one divided by zero error. It never occurred except in the cases, when same set of coordinates for some mass.
............... Your thank for your kind words dear William Goodwin,
I hope you also will work-out some other new problem using Dynamic Universe Model. It may take few day to few months, depending on the problem.
Best Regards
=snp.