Dear Mr. Dufourny,

I am not irritated. I am amused instead. Yes, I can goo deeper and, I went indeed deeper with a young collaborator, give a look to this paper.

I consider neither strings nor points like fundamental mathematical and physical objects. I think that the fundamental entity is a "particle" in its quantum meaning.

I do not know if you are attending this Contest. If yes, I wish you good luck.

Cheers, Ch.

:) I liked your answer, you are nice in fact, I thought on Facebook you have been odd with me, so sorry , I was rude and it was just to see more how you are going to react, I liked in fact your essay even if I see differently, I respect the thinkers. And I wish you a good road in your researchs, sorry the aim was simply to nalance the things . Friendly

Hi Christian,

Good to see you back, and with a fascinating new take on Black Holes. You'll recall as an astronomer I study AGN, and more recently the physical kinematics of their outflows. As BH's seem ever more closely connected to AGN I found your quite opposite purely theoretical approach of great interest.

I also found it beautifully clearly written as usual. I do suspect the judges may be under to much political influence to elevate it to the ranks of their chosen few, rather like mine.

I take a far more fundamental approach which, despite being quite different, even revolutionary in a different way, I think you'll understand and like.

Very Best

Peter

    Dear Steve,

    Thanks for clarifying. Actually, I do not remember when I was odd with you on Facebook. Maybe I had some problem that day. Can you clarify this issue?

    Cheers, Ch.

    Dear Peter,

    Thanks for your message. I am happy to re-meet you her in FQXi. Thanks also for the very nice comments on my Essay, I am honored by them.

    I will read comment and score your Essay soon. Good luck in the contest!

    Cheers, Ch.

    P.S.

    Please do not worry for the comments of Mr. Sorli. He is indeed a good guy, but his knowledge and understanding of fundamental physics are completely null. You should merely ignore him.

    Hello,

    I am sorry , I beleive that I have bad interpreted, I was probably paranoid lol, I delete my message here , have a good day

    Sorry still, this one has been approved, I wanted to delete them because i was too much rude, but I cannot Dr Corda. Sorry

    4 days later

    Hi Dr Corda, look at this ,

    considering different distances between the protons and electrons and reaching this quantum gravitation ? why ? because we have a deeper logic superimposed to our standard model, we must consider particles of gravitationa encoded in nuclei waker than our electromagnetism and we must probably insert a serie of quantum BHs farer than our nuclear forces, that permits to consider the electrons and protons like just emergent particles due to fields and their mass appear just due to bosonic mechanisms like the higgs fields simply, so now we can see better what is this quantum gravitationa and what we must consider like mass and distances, change now the distances in taking into account these quantum BHs, the main codes and these particles of DM encoded. Oddly I have reached this quantum weakest force .....our standard model needed simply to consider a deeper logic and consider that these protons and electrons are just emergent. That respects the newtonian mechanics dear all....quantum gravitation explained , eureka probably but I must publish correctly

    work about this to find the good partitions with the good mathematical Tools chosem, the hamiltion Ricci flow, the spheres, the aether coded, the Ricci flow, the theurston geonetrisation conjecture, the poincare conjecture, the deformations of spheres, the fact that space disappears with specific finiet series of this coded aether, the lie derivatives, the heat equation, the lie groups and the E8 mainly, the topological and euclidian spaces mainly , I become crazy I must say but I evolve each Days. The numbers also are very important , reals, rationals, irrationals, imaginaries,primes, p adics analyses, fourer harmonics , all seems under a pure universal distribution with these spheres and these finite series of this main coded aether .

    regards

      Dear Steve,

      These seem interesting ideas. I hope that you will develop them with rigorous mathematics. Good luck!

      Cheers, Ch.

      I am thanking you Dr Corda, I work about this, I have an other idea for the formalisation of my theory and these finite series of spheres of this gravitational aether where space disappears, the Ricci flow, normal but also a kind of assymetric Ricci flow to explain the unique things and all the geometries and topologies. I try to create this assymetric Ricci flow and it is inside thje particles , like a code permitting these geonetries, properties and topologies.It seems relevant and it is totally different than this 1Dmain field and the strings like main cause of our reality, the codes are inside the particles, in these finite series of thhis aether. Best regards

      Dear Steve,

      I invite you to submit your paper to the Journal for which I serve as Editor in Chief, that is JHEPGC.

      Cheers, Ch.

      Thank you very much, I will send it when it will be finished, I work about it , it is not easy but I evolve.

      Regards

      Christian. I enjoyed your paper and it's comments on information and black holes. In my paper "Clarification Of Physics--", I present a different perspective on information, what happens in black holes and their relationships to the creation of "our" multiverse and visible universe. I think you will find it interesting. Also I would appreciate your comments on my essay . John D Crowell

        Dear Christian:

        I enjoyed reading your paper as it addresses the important topic of predicting the collapse of the wave function via gravity.

        You may be interested in my paper - https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3440 entitled -"Unravelling the Missing Physics behind Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability" presenting a predictive model for gravitational collapse.

        Best Regards

        Avtar Singh

          7 days later

          Dear Christain,

          Good to meet again here on the FQXi contest,

          While reading your essay I had the following remarks and questions:

          Quote "the foundation of the BH information problem is that BHs seem to do not obey Schrödinger equations, which would allow pure states to evolve only into pure states." Unquote. The Total Simultaneity Interpretation", as I introduce, states that BH' are emergent phenomena (illusions) or could you say "PURE STATES". Not pure quantum mechanical and time-dependent seems to be supporting my interpretation. Probable Emissions and absorptions are all time and space-related emergent phenomena of ONE PURE STATE. The jump between two levels caused by an emission is the jump between one Pure State and another. In my perceptions, ALL jumps are sparkles of reality that is originating from the source of ALL emergence: Total Simultaneity. Each jump is like a split-up where one part is continuing (in another emergence(reality)) and the other slipping back into the womb as just an available probability.

          I am interested in " effective Regge-Wheeler potential of the time-independent Schröedinger-like equation which governs QNMs, see [4, 5, 10, 11] for details" and going to see the details. (you may understand now why)

          (17) on page 5 "represents a pure final state instead of a mixed final state", A pure final state is a past moment (compressed in our memory as a point of a time-line) and a mixed final state is the state from the unknown future where the observer has still to choose?

          The "collapse of the wave function" I already interpreted In paragraph 2 of my comment.

          "an electron's excited state is entangled with all the Hawking quanta emitted at that time [3, 5].",.An electron's excited state is again just a time-less moment of the emergent reality and is actually entangled to the WHOLE of the emergent phenomenon of this timeless moment.

          I learned again a lot from your essay and so valued it high.

          My essay is more of a philosophical approach, but I hope that after reading this remarks you will find some time to read my participation and tell me what you think about it. It is a whole new approach to reality.

          Best regards

          Wilhelmus de Wilde

            Dear Avtar,

            Thanks for your interest in my FQXi page. It will be my pleasure reading, commenting and voting your Essay soon. Good luck in the Contest!

            Cheers, Ch.

            Dear John,

            Thanks for your comments. I am happy to know that you enjoyed my Essay. It will be my pleasure reading, commenting and voting your Essay soon. Good luck in the Contest!

            Cheers, Ch.