- Edited
suicide society of the third milenium , the same a protein in a cell has a lifespan from seconds to days
the same "human" in the year 3000 will be semiaranged to live more or less a certain amount of time and naturally voluntarly terminate its own life after completions of goals
how could science be better
the competition essay does not specify what's year science, next year or after the sun's death five billions in to the future
the irony is that the data on this forum might last longer than that . a hadd drive if its ssd has an evaporation of the memory cells, if the next backup is made on photonic crystals or something ....
*later edit -no , there is a specification - for decades from now
there are two possibilities, one in witch, i'm a living scientist and one in witch, i am not
if i kill myself tomorrow witch of the two possibility i will check ?
can i be a scientist for a month than make a two years break and return to be a scientist
this reminds me of an other communication idea
namely there is an implicit assumption of the time expected for the reply .
when two or more people talk nobody is saying(specifying) -i will wait for your answer the interval between of 0.2 to 10 seconds and then after that i may change the subject of conversation by saying something more