I find this very sad that the majority of thinkers are in the prison of strings, photons and GR, really it is a serious global problem inside the theoretical sciences community, I am surprised even and their vanity and education cannot solve now this problem, odd really

in resume, we see well that we cannot renormalise this quantum gravitation and this GR , even with the supersymmetries, there is a foundamental problem and it is mainly due to the fact that we want to unify this QG with this GR, and so we consider only photons like main essence of our universe. The SUSY has tried in changing several things to solve this problem and so they have created smallest spin , you must understand that this gravitation is sensible to mass and that we have a problem of interactions with this GR, all the attemps made like the Mtheory or the works of Roveli or the loops , or the non commutativity cannot explain this problem and so they cannot quantify it, they can try with different symmetries and parametrizations or dimensions , that does not solve the renormalization, you see easily that this electromagntism, this GR, these photons are the problem, we have all tried to solve this problem and nothing , it is a fact, it is because it lacks something to superimpose and it is not a deeper photonic logic, but a new logic opposite permiting to balance simply. The gravitational waves primordial that said different of gravitationa einsteinian waves could be a proof of this quantum gravitation like main chief orchestra, this gravitation seems the main chief orchestra , and the electromagnetism is just emergent due to photons encoded in a deeper logic of main primoridal codes and particles of gravitation, the lorentz invariance is a tool interesting in all this reasoning.

an important point also is that this gravitation is instantaneous, and that this relativity special and general implies a light constant speed, it is also a problem foundamental, that implies a gravitational aether with this space and cold dark matter and fruthermore the evolution is also understood in this reasoning, we can even calculate the evolution of our universe correctly in my theory, if we continues with this GR and photons, that does not solve the quantum gravitation and that does not solve even all the others main unknowns. Can you encircle all this ?

Hi Steve Agnew,

The expanding sphere graviton of radius r = ct is an idea I got from looking at (a) the invariance of c, (b) the derivation of special relativity, (c) the spacetime interval. I was also looking for a carrier of the physics constants (something that is neglected by the physic community).

The mystery of the spin-2 graviton is not something I can answer with confidence at this time, other than to say that the graviton has to account for the stress energy tensor.

While the supserstring and the quantum loop are serious considerations for what causes the laws of physics to exist, I will always say the expanding graviton is a better idea because the whole universe expanded from a point, so why wouldn't an expanding graviton do likewise. But beyond that, I am not a physicist. I'm just a guy with some intuition who has noticed that superstrings and quantum loops don't expand like the big bang expanded.

The idea that a graviton is a wave function came as an answer to the question: do gravitons interact with particles? Also, the expectation value for position of a particle,

[math] = [/math]

Seems to be describing properties of space itself. Where is the particle? It's somewhere in the space that is described by the expectation value of x.

Latex is being wonky. I am trying to say that the expectation value for the position of a particle is equivalent to saying that a particle can be in any of these possible places in space, which makes the wave function (as something that exists) a promising candidate of what space itself is made out of.

Gravitons expand to create spacetime. They are made of quantum states for position and momentum. A black hole is just the case when there is high enough density to create an event horizon from which mass/energy cannot escape. A certain percentage of gravitons can escape from a black hole because they don't have mass/energy, they are just made of position/momentum quantum states. This is why black holes can exist.

    still you consider that the spacetime is only made of photons, if we have a deeper logic for the main origin, all is a false, imagine that these photons are just a fuel , permitting the electronagntism, the thermodnamics and heat, the fact to obeserve and their speed is constant, so we analyse just the spacetime actually with this, but imagibe that the particles of gravitations have nothing to do with this, I know that it is not easy to change a line of reasoning and that all we are persuaded and vanitious also us the humans, so steve Agnew and Jason, how can you affirm that the GR is the only one piece of puzzle and that these gravitatons hypotehtical are linked and that we must unify the GR and the quantum gravitation with this logic like if the quantum entanglement and the frequences and osccilations of these photons are the answer ? what are your proofs about the fact that the answers are there, you see well that theere are problems of renormalisation with this logic, so why you insist , the best thinkers have tried in this line of reasoning and they have not successed simply, don t loose your time but think beyond the box in consider a deeper logic and a gravitational aether and consider this Dark matter cold ,m you shall see that it acts, I know that it is difficult, it is due to this vanity, but really you shall see that in changing the distances and in respecting the newtonian mechanics, it acts because the main codes are farer and that this electronagntism is just emergent due to these photons encoded giving the bosonic fields,

    So you consider that they are photons and that they are in fact the cause of the expanding universe with different osccilations of these photons, it seems not true , the expansion is just due to a dark energy wich can be seen like a simple antigravitational spherical push from the central cosmological sphere permitting the evolution ,

    I think that the surface of the expanding graviton is a virtual photon. If it was energized, then it would be a real photon.

    Yes, I would say that the reason that dark energy is observed is because gravitons expand. Just the effect of continually adding new gravitons, expanding gravitons, is enough to cause the universe to continue to expand. It's just like how water coming out of a garden hose will cause the puddle to get bigger.

    it is a good idea, but don t forget that if these photons are not the primoridal essence, so we need a different logic superimposed to balance our standard model and the forces electronmagntic at all scales, it is like this that I see this gravitation balancing the heat ....if the cold dark matter is real, that can solve many things

    Steve,

    You use the word "vanity" in ways I had never thought possible: vanitious!!

    In my view, an expanding graviton has a volume,

    [math]vol = \frac{4}{3}\pi (ct)^3[/math]

    The volume is filled with quantum states for position and momentum.

    The surface of the expanding sphere has an area,

    [math]Area = 4pi (ct)^2[/math]

    which is the virtual photon. The Casimir effect, proven to exist, is caused by virtual photons.

    If there was any energy available to be transferred by virtual photons, it would excite a virtual photon, and have an energy,

    [math]E = h\nu[/math]

    Gravitons fill the universe with position, momentum quantum states, which we observe as spacetime geometry. There is probably some maximum amount of overlap of gravitons that has something to do with the Cosmological constant.

    When gravitons collide with particles, they can be adsorbed into the particle system and become part of the wave amplitude/wave function.

    Hi jason, yes the vanity is a big global problem and all we are vanitious , we are all persuaded but a time for all, I have explained this , now let s speak about this physics. In my model also I have equations, I know like you my foundamentals in physics , and the correlated equation, the problem is not there, we speak about the general philosophy of this universe and the real origin of this universe, what I tell is simple, we cannot affirm that these photons are the only one piece of puzzle like if a kind of God osccilated with geoentrical algebras the points or strings of an infinite heat to create the geometries, topologies, matters and fields, so you cannot affirm that these photons are the primordial essence, and so you cannot affirm that these gravitons are correct in changing their momentum, posotions or others due to different frequences, oscillations, it is this that I try to explain you, if the photons are not the main essence and that the fields are not the main origin, so all is false simply and nobody has proven these gravitons nor the fields like origin nor the points or strings like main begining at this planck scale, you can utilise all the known equations , that will not change this fact, we cannot affirm, we just have assumptions.

    There is a two-dimensional time in the universe, one time dimension comes from the collapse of the universe wavefunction, which is made up of gravitons as biphoton and the second time dimension comes from the collapse of the photon wavefunction of the atom. Attached is a sketch of this idea.

    It is true that a lot of very smart people have not figured this out yet, but the idea came from Paul Dirac's big Numbers Hypothesis. Dirac abandoned his idea because the galaxy measurements back then seemed to show that the fine-structure constant did not vary in deep space. Now, of course, there are plenty of more accurate measurements that do show variations in the fine-structure constant in deep space. So Dirac was right after all...

    Dark matter is a straightforward result of the coupling of moving star decay or radiation. I call it gravitization because it couples moving stars with a vector force just like magnetization couples moving charges with a vector force...there is no need for the dark matter fiction at all. Stars radiate complementary photon dipoles and so stars radiate biphoton gravitons as well. Graviton emission is what couples star motions in galaxy rotation and not dark matter.

    Matter-action discrete aether is therefore consistent with many unexplained observations like galaxy rotation, galaxy cluster rotation, fine-structure constant variation in deep space, pulsar decay, IPK decay, 11 year sunspot cycle, coupling of stellar variations in star clusters, and so on.

      I agree that photons are the glue that holds the universe together with exchange. Photon exchange is what binds atom charges together. What we think of as "free" photons are not actually free of their atom precursors because photon wavefunctions have have tails that never go to zero. Remember that gravity is 1e-39th of charge and so it is those "free" photon wavefunction tails that bind atoms to the universe as gravity.

      it is not only a glue, it is fuel creating the bosonic fields of our standard model and our ordinary matter, they create the electromagnetism and heat, they permit also to see and observe because without photons, there is no light and so we don t see, but forget the vanity and the fact to be persuaded that they are the only one piece of puzzle, your ideas about the gravitons are just like many an attempt to unify the GR and the quantum gravitation and like I told, it is not renormalisable, because simply we have a deeper logic for the space and the gravitation than these photons, but apprently the thinkers have difficulties to think beyond the box, we don t need lessons about the known equations, I know my foundamerntals, we need to explain the unknowns and the photons only and this GR are not sufficient, I am irritated sometimes in seeing the thinkers repeating the works of others but don t create new partitions imaginatative in thinking beyond the box, maybe they lack of general studies and cannot insert a deeper philosophy , it is odd , since when the photons are proved like the foundamental essence ?? you speak to god lol and you beleive in strings and consider an infinite heat oscillating in 1D these photons ??? it is not sufficient to reach our deep unknowns, it lacks many things, the space and the cold dark matter for me, and the vanity of thinkers shall not change this reality,