• Blog
  • Quantum Physics and the End of Reality by Sabine Hossenfelder and Carlo Rovelli

Georgina Woodward

I don't know...

"The trouble with people is not that they don’t know but that they know so much that ain’t so." Josh Billings

I have been giving you a link to "a relevant paper", repeatedly, for years. For once, please actually read it. Study it. Then actually download the computer code and run it; exactly as instructed in the short, easy to read paper. In just thirty minutes, you can reproduce the entire experiment/demonstration, right in front of your own eyes, on your own computer screen. That is far, far less time, than you have been devoting to all your futile speculations. Stop speculating and just run the demonstration. It has been freely available on fqxi.org, for seven entire years now, and not a single person out of the thousands of people that have examined it over the years, have ever publicly claimed to have found any flaw in it - quite the contrary. The supposedly impossible results, were independently verified within just a few weeks of my original fqxi post regarding this, back in August, 2016.

Reality does not work the way you think it works.
Reality does not work the way any physicists think it works.
Reality (deterministic behaviors) works the way Shannon proved that it must work, 75 years ago.

And Reality stops behaving deterministically, and starts behaving with "quantum weirdness", right where Shannon's Theorem proven that it must - at one bit of Information - Shannon's definition of Information - not physicists!

    Robert McEachern
    Sorry for asking. i did not know you would think that relevant to the discussion You present A Classical System for Producing“ Quantum Correlations” Robert H. McEachern, yet I am taking about the problem of proposing that entanglement happens as an explanation for correlation of 'seen this way' relative, detection matches., When using the quantum physics idea that the correlations found need explaining, as they do not show each individual outcome as random. > Robert McEachern The supposedly impossible results, were independently verified within just a few weeks of my original fqxi post regarding this, back in August, 2016."
    OK, those results are found. I don't disagree that the results were as described. They are as they are but don't explain for themselves why.
    Already i have talked about the numbers of matches found referring to a simple Bell's test. Different angle outcomes that happen by chance to correspond can not be counted as being the same as matches at the same orientation even though they have the same 'value'. Therefore we have two categories treated as one. We have correlations due to absolute orientations and correlations due to chance. Hats and scarves. The existing particles and existing experimenter and apparatus within independent of measurement absolute space. Why is the fraternal twin particle explanation needed in addition?

    Robert McEachern Reality does not work the way you think it works.
    Reality does not work the way any physicists think it works.
    Reality (deterministic behaviors) works the way Shannon proved that it must work, 75 years ago.

    Firstly maybe. Secondly I think that is true for the majority of mainstream physicists, working with Einstein's relativity and those working with quantum physics.
    Thirdly I'm just not sure of that.

      Georgina Woodward

      i did not know you would think that relevant

      "The trouble with people is not that they don’t know but that they know so much that ain’t so." Josh Billings

      EVERYTHING YOU THINK YOU KNOW ABOUT REALITY IS WRONG! EVERYTHING!

      Just like the Leaning Tower of Pisa is wrong - out of kilter - as the result of being built upon a bad foundation - continuous mathematics - Calculus. It is "not even wrong" - it is "just" entirely Irrelevant to how Reality works.

      It is as wrong/irrelevant as PTOLEMY's theory of epicycles is wrong. And for exactly the same reason. It does not matter how perfectly it may fit the observations, because it has absolutely nothing to do with the way nature goes about causing deterministic effects to occur.

      You cannot "fix the problem", by moving around a few "pieces of the puzzle" to try to make them fit into your out-of-kilter "world view". Your entire world view needs to be torn down and rebuilt "correctly", upon a foundation of discrete (Quantized) mathematical concepts (sampling theory), rather than the continuous math foundation, of calculus.

      Shannon figured out how to do that and that is how he transformed the world and made modern communications possible.

      If you ever bother to think about it, you will realize that you do not see any calculus in my paper; no differential equations, no integrals. Because that entire approach to mathematical physics, has no relevance to what Mother Nature is actually doing, except as a crude approximation, that is only valid in the circumstances in which enormous amounts of Data, manifest only a tiny amount of "Information"; what has come to be called, the Classical Realm.

        Robert McEachern

        There is no Physics, in physics!

        The world is not operating physically. It is operating symbolically! All the way down! Like the discrete letters of an alphabet, embedded within a continuous, cursive script.

        And each individual letter, MUST appear to "the Uninformed" as white noise!!!

        Noise is not causing problems with measurements! Noise is the language of Reality. All of it - from top to bottom.

        "Abandon all hope, all ye who enter here!" Dante

        Stop talking with Measurements. Stop talking with Calculus.
        Physicists need to learn to speak "Noise", not Measurements
        Physicists need to learn to speak "Noise", not Calculus.

        Shannon will teach them how, if they ever bother to listen.

        Once you learn to speak the language of Mother Nature, the language of Noise, nothing gets "Lost in Translation" anymore, into the inadequate language of Modern Physics. EVERYTHING, not just Physics, starts to make Perfect Sense.

        All of physics, has merely discovered how to make perfect copies of Mother Nature's hand-written, cursive scripts; how to write "laws" that merely describe, what is being observed. But only Shannon ever discovered how to ACTUALLY READ that script! How to cause deterministic effects, and thereby EMERGE from the old-Reality of the Chaos of random noise, into a new-Reality of Deterministic noise.

        After working through dozens of pages of standard, complicated math dealing with measurements and noise and probability and error-correcting codes, Shannon finally... finally... obtained ENLIGHTENMENT:

        The net effect of all that crap, was just to construct symbols that ended-up behaving, statistically, just like white noise!

        Hence, you can just skip all that crap, and use actual noise samples to write perfectly deterministic scripts; scripts that could be perfectly read (with no Uncertainty whatsoever), even when submerged under an entire ocean of other noise! Deterministic behaviors can been created, entirely out of The Chaos itself!

        That is what a "quantum of information" is - a packet of noise, Mother Nature's Alphabet, riding upon some sort of physical "carrier", that looks, to all the ignorant "Uninformed" (AKA physicists), just like random noise, but can be perfectly (with no "uncertainty") read by the "Informed", to induce deterministic behaviors to emerge from seeming chaos!

        Quantum Physics and the End of Reality...

        Indeed. The end of all reality as we know it - as we have incorrectly conceived of it.
        "The trouble with people is not that they don’t know but that they know so much that ain’t so." Josh Billings

        From the ashes of entirely random, physical behaviors (Chaos), REALITY, like the ultimate hacker, has managed to continuously overwrite and enlarge its own "operating system" (Laws of Nature) using the language of pure noise (the only "material" available, in a Cosmos, consisting of nothing but CHAOS!) to produce a new, ever-changing reality, that now includes an ever-growing set of entirely, deterministic behaviors. The Great Phoenix, rises from the ashes. So, the ancient legends are true - although some things were indeed, lost in translation.

        For centuries, philosophers and physicists, theologians and politicians, have all been searching for "that which is necessary" to explain reality. But nothing is necessary (think about that: there is something within nothing/chaos!); other than one thing being sufficient. Entirely sufficient: Noise just needs to behavior like noise.

        But no one on this Earth every knew that one, simple, astonishing fact; until Shannon achieved ENLIGHTENMENT.

          Robert McEachern
          i am suprised by your reply. Very expressive, I'm sorry you feel so frustrated. i came here to expand on 'Thirdly,," I' don't know that particle pairs traveling in opposite directions in a vacuum is comparable to radio waves in air or electricity in a wire. Doing similar thing numerically takes away the physics. I'm not persuaded to give up on material reality There isn't just outputs of an equation or processing without any source of input, just randomness. There isn't just the chaotic 'data pool' prior to receipt. There isn't just material existence. All 3 play their part , allowing sensory perception of the world. Human's are embodied and think and feel.

            Georgina Woodward

            Georgina,

            You, like almost all of humanity, are trapped in a huge maze of our ancestors creation. A "reality" maze, with no entrance or exit. You, like everyone else, was born inside it. And it was built inside an even larger such maze, and that within another even larger...

            You can either stumble around lost within it, for your entire life (like the physicsts have been doing for the past century), looking for a non-existent exit, or you can smash your way out. The choice is yours. You can either be like Alexander the Great and simply destroy this Gordian Maze, or you can remain forever, bound within it.

            Shannon gifted us all with a weapon, powerful enough to smash the maze. Use it. Yes, it is an awful prospect to have to rebuild everything, from the shattered pieces. But there is no other way out. Like the "Quantum Reality" puzzle I posted above, individual pieces can not be moved into an alternative new configuration, one-at-a-time, that "fits inside the box". Evolutionary changes are not possible. Only a revolutionary, all encompassing change, will ever suffice, to free you from the maze and provide you with an opportunity to rebuild it correctly. That is just the Nature of Reality, like it or not. And very few indeed, like it.

            I'm not persuaded to give up on material reality

            You do not have to. You only have to give up on your unwarranted belief, that you have ever inherited a reasonable Picture of Reality. But like most people, that seems to you, to be an even worse alternative. Like most people, you fervently hope to save the Picture of Reality that you inherited, and have invested your whole life in trying to maintain - like an old British Lord, trying to keep his old, inherited, crumbling castle, from collapsing, rather than tearing it down and building a new one. You can save it. But only at the cost of being forever trapped within your old, worn down, woefully inadequate Picture of Reality. And never even catching a glimpse of Actual Reality. The choice Is yours. The irony in that, is that all the people like yourself, are running around with smart-phones etc, that would never work, except by exploiting Shannon's discovery. You all seem to believe that those communications signals, would appear like just a very fast sequence of ones and zeroes, maybe with a little bit of error correction thrown into the mix. They do not. Just as Shannon said they must, they would appear to you, as meaningless noise. In fact, in many cases, your concept of "measuring" them, would fail to even establish they they exist, all around you. Using your antiquated "Picture of Realty", you would never observe anything at all, other than noise. There is nothing there to ever even be "measured", via the hopelessly naive concept of "measurement" that you and physicists, are clinging to.

              Robert McEachern
              I am not saying that all i previously mentioned is in 3Dspace. What is experienced is relative products that are presented to us by our brain processing ,as if it is the space we inhabit bodily, Our human brains take sensory input and generate a 3 D space and emergent time , Not an existing unchanging dimension ,though, and different from absolute uni-temporal foundational time. David Eagleman has shown perceived occurrence of events can be modified to give a unified coinciding of events ,overcoming their risk of out of synch representation due to transmission delay of different sensory stimuli. The material sources of sensory stimuli are in absolute space ,as is the data pool of sensory stimuli. Here is where we can imagine the unified field Einstein sought. Not in space-time. As you can see I'd like to make quite a few modifications not just take what i have inherited as valid .

                Georgina Woodward

                David Eagleman has shown perceived occurrence of events...

                The problem is, if you can never even "perceive" that an "event" ever even occurred, that will never work. But that is exactly what many of Shannon inspired signals "look" like - events that have never occurred; just static noise that looks no different than if there actually were no events ever taking place.

                As you can see I'd like to make quite a few modifications not just take what i have inherited as valid

                I have indeed seen that, for a long time. The problem is, I have also seen that neither you, nor the physicists, in spite of your ardent desire, do not have the slightest clue of how to actually accomplish making any modifications that will get you out of the maze; because you all simply refuse to ever look at the incredible gift, that Shannon handed to you, because doing so, requires you to trash your entire inheritance, plus all the work you have put into it, to date.

                That is why it has long been observed, as in Planck's principle, that revolutionary changes are usually only accepted, by people that have no such inheritance and have never wasted any of their own effort, trying to maintain them. No one ever succeeded in indoctrinating them (though many may have tried) into believing that their elders' ancient, sacred idols can never be desecrated and thrown in the trash - so they just go ahead and do exactly that. And they can succeed in doing so, precisely because there are no Laws of Nature prohibiting it - because there are no static Laws of Nature at all!

                Reality is a process, still under construction; always was, always will be.

                  Robert McEachern
                  In order to function, find food, mate, avoid predators it is necessary for most animals to locomote . That requires construction of an internal map (The present). Processing of sensory data allows that. Hallucination and mistakes occur due to internally generated gap filling and overlay. I think some data processing errors can occur too as well as later on mistakes of perception. Not all that is experienced via the senses is a semblance of what exists or happens. However there must be sufficient likeness, for biological organisms to carry out their activities of living and survive to reproduce and so continue their kind. Evolved sensory systems and brains are able to extract meaning and build recognizable constructs from the noise of the stimuli in the environment. Specialized devices too are able to function contrary to your insistence. Sorry, I don't see how Shannon's work can be used as a guide , despite following up on your leads

                    Georgina Woodward

                    Sorry, I don't see how Shannon's work can be used

                    There is nothing to be sorry about. Ignorance is bliss. Just be happy that others that have seen how Shannon's work can be used, have provided you with your phone, TV, Internet, etc., that add to your bliss. Be happy that your paycheck never accidentally gets deposited in someone else's account - as the result of a bit-error in a transmitted account number - a bit-error that Shannon discovered a sure-fire means to prevent.

                    And as for living creatures - Mother Nature discovered Shannon's technique, eons before Shannon ever did - you see it in action with every DNA double-helix copying operation. Or do you believe that all the zillions of potential mutations (bit-errors) have be avoided, by magic? And how do you suppose the signals flowing through your brain, do not become hopelessly garbled, by all the zillions of copying errors that would occur, in the process of being sent from one neuron to another and another and...

                    Ever wonder why neuron signals look like random spikes - like noise? As Shannon proved, only noise-like signals can be copied, without frequent errors, in a high-noise environment, like a brain. Shannon's technique is what makes complex life possible. Now you know. It is what makes all of Reality possible (well, at least all the deterministic parts) Now you know. And when even Shannon's technique becomes insufficient to prevent frequent copying errors, determinism itself, repeatable cause-and-effect processes, existing as a physical phenomenon, beginf to self-destruct, resulting in "the biggest, baddest boogey-man of them all - "Quantum Weirdness!" Now you know.

                      Robert McEachern
                      i don't know personally how to apply it in understanding existence and experience, though it is widely useful for technology. TV, computer , phone outputs are all products output by devices after transmission, so is the numerical bank balance. . A small part of what happens. I know there are DNA repair mechanisms. There's a lot i don't known i admit,

                        Georgina Woodward

                        There's a lot i don't known i admit

                        So why not also admit, at least to yourself, that you might profit from learning from the best, like Shannon, rather than continuing to bumble around in the dark, looking for a way to escape, from a maze with no apparent exit?

                          Robert McEachern
                          Finding explanations that work for me and that i can understand is what I do. Imagery experienced via TV ,computer or phone will be a self generated image, of a reconstructed semblance from transmitted data that was obtained from a relative semblance produced by a device, such as a camera, using data /stimuli transmitted from the source absolute material reality.

                            Georgina Woodward

                            Most people do find it "pleasing", which is why they like to believe in magic, fairies, heroes, gods and unwarranted speculation, that will save them from whatever they fear, and from ever having to think about, what is on the other side of their coin - their "Picture of Reality." Their belief is the illusion; they have simply accepted the illusion as their reality. Ignorance is Bliss.

                            4 days later

                            One of a generated pair of photon particles is sent to Alice. She uses some apparatus set to a certain orientation to detect it. Bob selects the same orientation of apparatus. by doing so they have chosen the same relative 'seen this way' reference frame. This reveals the relationship of the particle pair at creation of the pair that is retained until interaction disturbs it. At measurement the resulting outcome is newly formed but not the particle pair. The particles pre-exist the measurement. The problem is with the theory assuming that the pair are randomly appearing individually at measurement ,and therefore need to co-ordinate their measured states. The fact that things can exist before measurement and choosing the same reference frame for generating the relative measurement takes care of that.

                              Georgina Woodward
                              Prior to observation, or measurement involving orientation of apparatus, there can not be a definite relative outcome state, involving orientation, because the outcome is a relative determination.
                              That does not mean that the subject under investigation does not have an orientation within the pattern of all currently existing things. Which is different from one singled out and described relation. This is showing the error of both QM and ERP. ERP is wrong for assuming the relative outcome is predetermined before measurement, prior to the choosing of individual viewpoint. QM is wrong for not considering absolute observer independent orientation of the subject, and therefore a pre-measurement relation of orientations of a particle pair.

                              a month later