Dear Hasmukh

I fully agree, what you are naming Ultimate Reality is the same idea as my Total Simultaneity, only TS is comparable to GOD. The sun becoming red giant is a time-life line in our causal consciousness, it is only causal there is an infinity of YOU's in TS there is the direct entanglemnt of your causal consciousness to GOD.

The new BICEP2 results only are mirrors of yhis causal consciousness, The BB is not needed for an existance GOD, it is only one of the ways he expresses Himself (one of he availabilities in TS). An eternal heartbeat of the material universe without BB is as Great as the idea of a BB.

pls see also the post above.

best regards

Wilhelmus

Tim,

Are you the menmber of the balsare Research Group ,

(Just to know who is who)

if so your Group would be able to control my ideas on Eternal Now Moment Hopping or the possible change of reality.

Thank you for the Hoffman reference, I am streading it after this message to you.

You are quite right non-caused is better as non-causal but English is not my mother language (which is Dutch), I will take it in serious thought to change this in my article for COSMOLOGY.(Pls do not hesitate if you ahve mire remarks of this kind, I am very thankfull for that and not at all offended...)

Your "Ideality" is very well expressing my "CREALITY"...

Your non-caused consciousness however will be ETRNALLY conscious, your caused consciousness is going to have some rest when you die, but it is only one of an infinity of YOU's...

Howinson seems to have the same basic thoughts (above = Total Simulatneity) as we have but also this item needs my attention (thanks again Tim)

Our "solitary" is the Subjective Simultaneity Sphere (SSS) that surrounds our causal consciousness, it receives all signals that are to be handled by our (five) senses, indeed it is a solitude and unique position when you reamrk that each individual receives his signals at different moments (because of the distance of the (also unique) source. So you are in this reality unique and on your own...

You and I are trying to give an interpretation of the colours of our SSS and in doing that we try to determinate the origin of the received signals, every interpretation is different but it is remaining just a try. The only thing I am saying is that the origin of ALL signals that arrive at our SSS are created by (uncaused) consciousness, indeed an ourobouros....

best regards

Wilhelmus

Dear Tim,

Thanks for your answers, it is a pleasure to exchange ideas.

Regarding Balsara, I did not go deep in it, only tried to find you, with the experiments they are achieving I also saw solar energy , so my thinking was that when they are having "real" labs they also would be able to first control if I am right with my idea about a "time-travel" unit, which is not a time-travel unit but a unit to transfer yourself to other realities (which in simple-man's idea is also time-travel...) but perhaps this is tooooo far because first of all you need a quantum computer with 1000 qubits....

Your term "Ideality" is almost the same as my "creality" only the sound of ideality is harboring "IDEAL" which is confusing because you are pointing at the word "IDEA" (I think)....

I agrre with your expression : "I am a unitary and unique copula of eternally infinite potential" The unit that you are NOW is in causal prison surrounded by its unique SSS, no other unit is receiving the same information, because every causal consciousness is at a different location. The eternal potential is the same as the non-caused consciousness in TS, where "every YOU" is an availability, but also there the unique you of this space/time is representing an unique Eternal Now Moment (ENM), ALL the other available you's are though (a bit) different, and ALL together they form the conception that we describe (but do not succeed to) as GOD.

The many worlds as I see them are quite different as the MWI because the MWI is only working towards the future, my idea is that there are no splittings of universes at the moment of observation, we only change of ENM (availability) in TS. So no creation of a whole new universe, no just a creation of a new time/life-line.(reality).

You are mentioning Joy Christian, there are different blogs with and about him here on FQXi, I am not the kind of "realist" he is.

Yes indeed we all are from the same source of availabilities , maybe we are all ONE in the singularity that is called TS (GOD ????), you and I are made of the same immaterial and material stuff, and above that matter does not exist (see articel).

"In YOU and YOu in ME indeed, as he said "We have all the same Father". John also wrote "In the beginning was the "WORD"" the Logos, what we are thinking of. furthermore : "In the house of my father are many Rooms" : The infinity of ENM's that all are representing an infinity of time/life-lines.

The No's you are mentioning always need a Yes to be a real No. But I also argue that in-between these yes and no's there is infinity of tones of grey, the no you are taking as position is one of the infinite choices you can make and it represents only a No because of the fact that your actions after this No are specifically linked to this decision. You are in this way limiting your Free Will in this causal prison...There was a time that I ended every answer with "THINK FREE"

Never forget also that NOBODY is the beholder of THE TRUTH, we are ALL seekers in the maze of our own created reality.

Your last sentence " The only thing I am saying etc...." is the perfect way of understanding my own ideas of Ts and SSS !!! thank you for that.

on the ps's

I just wrote this post in the FQXi box below this thread, the long article I wrote as Word and pasted it in the box, there was no problem. you have my personal e-mail (wilhelmus.d@orange.fr) so if something like links go wrong sent them there.

I promis you to read Howison, because from what you are telling he is at the same wave-length, if you have special links for his work, don't hesitate to sent them.

to be continued

BEST regards

Wilhelmus

PS In the morning I work with my hands and in the afternoon with my what is called "brain", I have to sent my article before the 31 of March to Cosmology, so I might react sometimes a little later....

dear Tim,

Thanks again for your thoughts, some short remarks :

I like very much your "concept" cxmplx, it describes indeed the cxmpxity of our consciousness.

Again about "ideality" : Ideals are goals that maybe never be reached, an idea is a non-material perception that may be never be realized neither, but the diffence is clear, you can have an idea about an ideal, before reaching the I-deal you have to deal to act, and with an idea you have not to act materialistically but you can proceed spiritually. Therefore when you change the A to an O , you got I-Deo (the me that is God) and come to the concept IDeolity, the ID (identity and DEo are then together.(just thinking freely)

About non-causal and uncaused , I really had a long thought about it and have the following remark(s) :

Your "Uncaused" reminds me of the "Unmoved Mover" from Aristotle and indeed refers to the Creator that itself is not created. Non-causal is a concept that cannot be referred to in our causal universe, it is valid for ALL perceptions outside this causal universe including the uncaused. I know the difference is very minimal but it is there... what do you think ?

This brings me direct to your part 3 where you mention : "GOD himself". This is an expression that I do not accept, this is the way that religions are created for the deaf and dumb (sorry), It si not that we are created in his image, NO we are GOD ourselves in our uncaused (!) consciousness. My whole work is to try to give a new and fresh explanation of this GOD perception that is all along mankind for all times, just because each human being is creating his own image of GOD, and though looking in a mirror...So going back again to part one where you say "I am created" it is the "I" that is part of the WHOLE , the "I" that is unique and here in this prison of time mortal, try to ascend this prison and find your eternal "I" with ALL availabilities.

Creativity as over-estimation is in this prison indeed an over-estimation, because we are just using the material around us that is already created, so it would be better to talk about "re-creation" and that concept has w quite another meaning, or do we feel better after we created the stuff around us ? BUT creation in the way that we are talking about which is the creation of reality is not at all overestimated , but underestimated, because it is not understood...

part 2 : Your remark that NOW can not be point-like is a logic causal remark, we are here always inclined to look at the before and the after from a number or a point, that is why the eternity is not understood and leads to all kind of paradoxes...

What is the "meaning" of a way of thinking like determinism ? The only way i see it is that it leads to an temporary explanation, look for temporary because if anything is causal it is determinism, so all results will be only an approach untill they are reaching the point ZERO, that is the fate of this way of thinking...

Indeed "every knowledge is personal" just because of the fact that your consciousness is a singularty at the center of its SSS (Subjective Simultaneity Sphere) and each sphere has a different center at differnt locations, so the surfaces of the received signals are all of different colors...

Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh. I am That I am, it is great isn't it ? It is the perfect description of our beings. In Christianity it is explained by Jesus : The Father = Total Simultaneity, The Holy Ghost is Consciousness, and the Son is our mortal body (the illusion of matter).

"My individual development does not seem explainable without reference to such an ongoing relationship" Your SSS is receiving each moment new signals from other "I's" with also their own causal consciousness, but these other SSS's are on other places and times (see above) but perhaps united in TS , it is like "decoherence" that all the SSS's at a certain Planck moment are united , but this unification is a temporal happening, so we can never (even with the speed of our communication tools) being aware of the whole shebang in this causal universe.

end of part three:

The grey is everywhere in-between all your decisions, you never act like an algorithm with strong rules, because you think FREE....

best regards

Wilhelmus

Dear Tim,

It is very short today but :

It is in my perception NOT that one of the Other "I's" is God , NO verey "I" is GOD...

I tried to mail you but each time I get the "mailer demon" which means that my message is going to hell and so not reaching you in heaven...

best regards

Wilhelmus

15 days later

Wilhelmus,

Your goal:

"The best "technology" to achieve these ideals is taking care of our children and educate them not to strive for(short)economic profit but to strive for the growth of their own consciousness, so that every other individual can share in its findings."

Is very nicely stated, and hopefully we can find a day when we can truly break free of short term economic needs.

Best,

Harlan

    I enjoyed your paper Wilhelmus..

    I find myself agreeing on many points, and overall I like the way you presented your thesis, but a little more time might have been spent editing or polishing the manuscript - to create a better flow of ideas. Also in criticism, you make some naive statements about quantum fields and other things, but you have evidently done your homework and tried to home in on things you know well. Indeed, your central thrust being the growth of consciousness as a prime motivator is inspired, and seldom finds expression in Science essays. This is to be lauded and admired. And indeed my own essay focuses on how important it is to enhance consciousness growth. But there are complications with some of your ideas.

    In order to avoid the existential risk from a computer awakening singularity event, we are in a race to build machines capable of more subtle forms of reasoning, before the interconnections of machines reach a critical mass while computers are still brutish in their nature. We need to be able to build robots like R2D2 and C3PO, in order to avoid having robots like the Terminator as our tormentors and slave masters. Will we still remain useful to the advanced machines of tomorrow, if we give them superhuman capabilities? Are we better off giving them the capacity for human-like emotions and feeling-based motivations? Perhaps we are better off taking the existential risk seriously, and deciding what outcomes would increase the likelihood of human survival.

    All the Best,

    Jonathan

      I should add..

      Part of what I am trying to do is assure that humans get to the singularity first, rather than the machines. I am all for truly intelligent machines, and we are likely better off if they are smarter than they need to be, but we need to give human beings the edge. If we were better able to encourage the natural evolution of the learning process in our young people, we would help them to maintain the natural advantage humans have over machines, but efforts to systematize education have forced children to be more mechanical rather than allowing them to be more human. So the emphasis of the human angle in your essay is appreciated.

      Regards,

      Jonathan

      1st response:

      Where did I say "...'each difference of view' leads to war..."?

      I did say, "Competition must be allowed between religions, between approaches to technology, and between approaches to the environment." in the paper and "The room for different views may be had if the views include tolerance for other views (as the rise from tribes to chiefdoms suggests) and include the cooperation with the different views." in a reply.

      Hodge

      Wilhelmus,

      In regards to Total Simultaneity, I should mention two ideas worth examining. First off; you should check out Phil Gibbs' "Theory of Theories" which is explained in his Event Symmetric Space-Time book, and also in some articles in Prespacetime and on viXra, as part of his Cyclotron Notebook papers. In brief; the concept is that there is a collection of all possible applicable Math in theory space, which exists in a kind of superposition where reality manifests as a path integral involving condensation of all possible theories that explain certain results. In a way, what is real is determined by the density of various possibilities being a consequence of different theories - all at once - rather than only one theory at a time being true.

      Also of note is Paola Zizzi's "Big Wow" theory of Cosmology in a Computing Universe model that involves a massive superposition where what causes particular threads to decohere is a sort of conscious awakening for the universe as a whole. This reasoning is based on the calculation for superposed qubits in the pre-decoupling universe, and comparing that to Penrose's calculation of superpositions in microtubules in the human brain - finding them to be of the same order of magnitude. Zizzi concluded that the universe's "Big Wow" event is what caused our specific universe (and others) to congeal out of the primeval fireball. I'll try to point you to the right papers on arXiv, once I've had a chance to look it up.

      Regards,

      Jonathan

        Thanks a lot Jonathan,

        Indeed I know Phil (my articles are also published with Huping Hu's "Scientific God Journal") but did not know that he published this items, I await your info

        Wilhelmus

        • [deleted]

        • Post #24

        Fellow Comrade,

        You wrote, "Life , from its origin on, has influenced our planet, the result is now a planet with 7 billion people". Who can argue this? And probably the influence is proportionate to time of existence which means it will continue to expand like elasticity. I hope it will not get to the braking point according to Robert Hook with time! How will this feeding bottle you called earth sustains the population explosion and guarantee the survival of humanity?

        It is interesting you wrote about the sun as the source of energy. Let's tell the world to use this energy in proportion to the balance of the 7 billion people inter-relating with other creatures in the universe and the natural habitat.

        Your article counts and worth ruminating.

        God bless.

        Gbenga Michael Ogungbuyi

          Hi, Wilhusmus,

          My email address is .

          Thanks,

          Raymond Law,

          HONG KONG

          Dear Wilhelmus,

          I enjoyed reading your essay.

          Although consciousness is an abstractive concept....I believe that I have made a physical connection of the processes involved. The paper in the following link gives such connection.

          Regards,

          Ken Seto

            Sorry....the link for the paper is as follows:

            http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011life.pdf

            Thank you for writing this essay, Wilhelmus. It is very thought-provoking, and I am especially intrigued by your remarks on the illusion of matter. This tracks closely with my own thinking along these lines. It seems that beyond space and time, matter and energy, there has to be an underlying dimension, without form or substance. Whether it is called consciousness, information, aether, God or anything else, it clearly possesses some organizing force or else there would be chaos. Or perhaps there is chaos, and I am merely suffering from the illusion of the organization of matter. In either event, the promise you offer of a time of heightened consciousness on this planet and in its environs offers hope for the future.

              Is this the Wilhelmus that I had the discussion about "What is Nothing" several years ago in the Quantum Physics forum? If so, our discussion spawned my treatise about a method and pathway to control space-time.

              My position was that "Nothing" does not exist in an environment coupled with relativity.

              Quantum Entangled Singularities

              http://qesdunn.pbworks.com

              The building of relativity through the model of quantum causality.

              Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity

              http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0041v1.pdf

              So the idea of Quantum Consciousness is of interest for me. Consider our short 30,000 years of technological significance and our pathway of growth and our desire to evolve. Now consider the potential of civilizations that are billions of years older technologically then ourselves. The likelihood that they have already done what we propose to do is obvious. So having them be a part of every atom within us is not beyond consideration; i.e. related to quantum entanglements.

              Your abstract caught my attention, I will read your essay next.

                From James Dunn

                FQXi Submission:

                Graduated Certification for Certification of Common Sense

                http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2045

                You might find the Princeton University Global Consciousness Project interesting. Since their first and on-going research related to human event based non-random event signatures, researchers have developed an online interferometer coupled with a website interface. The experiment has no push button. The object is to "Will" the outcome of photons related to the interferometer. I have used this experiment. "IF" the data collected is analyzed correctly, there is surprising correlation that intuitively should not be present.

                So by what mechanism can this remote manipulation occur?

                Since the Princeton University Global Consciousness data shows a response indicating near instantaneous interactions, the tendency is to lean toward quantum entanglement or related quantum relationships.

                A sidebar conversation related that potentially everyone's subconscious mind is connected to everyone else. This then accounts for all inconsistent but non-random paranormal activities like telepathy, clairvoyance, ghosts ... Why ghosts cannot in-general be photographed even when seen. They occur as manifestations within our minds.

                As such, global consciousness is a form of quantum consciousness. As subconscious influences, our minds are never making decisions isolated from the whole.

                In a piece I wrote a couple of years back, I explored the potential for one level of our afterlife to exist within this structure. All our lives if we are connected actively with everyone else, a system of relativity can potentially evolve that does not totally depend upon the personality source. When we die the global consciousness contributions of the individual continue interacting at least in-part at the subconscious level of everyone still living. To me, the Ten Commandments made much more sense from this perspective; the protecting of the soul in an afterlife. If part of your soul is supported by your enemy, would you kill them?

                This was a mind map based upon what I was exposed to at the time. As I have been exposed to new relationships, I have not yet found cause to modify the potential of our soul being held in all people's still living.

                The Quantum Consciousness you describe may indeed exist as our soul. But keep in mind until experimentally attempted to disprove these relationships, and failing to do so, there is no firm basis for making these assertions.

                Dear Wilhelmus,

                While appreciating your view of consciousness being the essence of humanity, I beg to differ with you on material as the created reality. Material too is fundamental to the Nature, at par with humanity and consciousness. No material has ever been created, but only transformed. Indeed, nothing, even the human consciousness, won't exist without material.

                Any way, I thank you for stirring human minds in a big way on appreciating value of human consciousness.

                Dear Will,

                I love your essays and the depth and knowledge of consciousness you share in them and as you know I consider you as my alter ego and I know that you feel the same way too. I totally agree with you that we need to nurture our children with this knowledge of consciousness and love for all which is the essential property of consciousness. Internet is the best medium to achieve this level of communication of free unlimited knowledge about all aspects of life and hence I chose to create a website that would provide information to all those who seek it in a easier way.

                Please see Any Body Can Do - Everything For Good which is a custom category search engine and a portal of portals.

                I have also blogged about the consciousness and included several videos on that topic in the everything section of the site. This is my way of contributing to the world of a tool to assist our children to gain the awareness for a better future on this planet in this duality of existence.

                Love,

                Sridattadev.