Hello Mr Ris,

Thanks for sharing this Block Model, I have created this group of global collaboration to share all the ideas possible to convice this UN and all are welcome to give their models and ideas. The most important for me is thjat we must adapt us to this global actual system economical even if I beleive that the money is a stupid invention, we are obliged to make with this actually. Its utilisation can be rational if the consciousness is correlated. We evolve and we can solve these global problems. In this group where the aim is to create a manifest of solutions adapted to convice this UN is to be rational and wise , we shall not taken into account the religious thoughts and the utopist solutions. I am interested to know more about your block model and how we can be deterministic with its concrete solutions, I repeat but we must adapt us to the global actaiul system and the fact that all wins also is essential, could you resume please these solutions in ecolgy for example, economy, technology, sociology, researchs, sciences, education, we need to be concrete and deterministic, thanks still for sharing, regards it seems interesting that you tell also that all wins, the banks like the richest, we are obliged indeed to change and evolve converging with our universal laws.

Dear Steve,

Thanks for the quick reply. To be more legally precise for a UN the block model is in the basis just one A4 and it deterministically proves the five algorithms at play in the mammal brain being humans mammals. It shows that money isn't part of our DNA, yet it is of course important as a logical derivative that is used. For a Christian I'd say indeed do not worship Mammon, the money devil.

It mathematically within physics elevates the soft sciences to exact sciences. And so proves that not having a decent wage as a function of the GNP of a community / country is legally slavery. That is already forbidden by treaty. Alas this humans being or not being mammals is of course inherently religious, yet most religions are practical when it comes to trade and money. For the block model is consistent with all world religions when taken as a metaphor. Science proper is a religion to yet to be taken literally.

It can in the Netherlands be quickly further tested for we Dutch where nearly there with our polder politics system that went astray when we followed the US style neo liberal system and stopped polder politics. Best also quickly test it on the Dutch Antilles. What happens when they agree to implement the model. As an extra because of not having had ideal training and education in the test we may provide in a host of teachers. When you use proper group think consistent with the block model you will as a community / organization always take the correct optimal decision. In effect the Dutch magistrates have already been chosen correctly for the specific job of doing law. The only problem is they still only per hap chance work together in the correct team. When the team is formed it works in effect automatically. For instance the Dutch following French law since 1848 already stated the youngest judge in chambers speaks first. In effect you use a Theory U type system in which all ego is taken out of the process. And you do the OODA loop twice. I think MIT already worked with this to great effect. Well in effect that is it really for when taking correct decisions you start solving literally all problems of humanity.

I predict on the Antilles that are in dire straits with high criminality lots of mental problems will quickly snap out of it. As far as no permanent brain damages have been afflicted everybody will start to behave. Decent bread and decent games is the trick even the Romans knew worked. In effect we bribe everyone to behave and start permanent excellent education of everyone.

The basic thing is extremely practical. By only putting your team in order (your team is always in your larger DNA family B.T.W.) and strictly follow the well-known Bayesian mathematical formula (the synapse of our brain works Bayesian as the chip is also documented in neurology.).

The fundamental thing is that we have four speeds of brain distributed in a normal distribution 10%-40%-40%-10%. As a metaphor to visualize how easy the basics can be taught to kids it shows (I successfully modelled the brain as a say 90% correct guess on a game of chess (would work on a game of Go as well I guess) the DNA start position of the - collective! - mammal brain. As with chess the game can be played at different levels. The more nuance is used the stronger this models predictions become.

To make it even more easy for kids to grasp:

10% TGV far above average fast trains.

40% Inter City above average fast trains

40% Commuter below average fast trains

10% Marshalling yard far below average trains.

Less than 1% deviation of broken DNA with acute anxiety problems.

A TGV is a hopeless marshaling yard train and vice versa. I'm an evident TGV when you believe the drawings have been made by me. Yet you should go through the whole of the algorithms to check. You can only fool the system and yourself for a short while and why would you want to? My Achilles heel is that I over complicate things. A Murphys law. A well trained marshalling lock simply can't make that mistake. On average 10% of problems the cosmos throws at us / any organization is far below average complex but failing to spot that in time and you don't reach whatever important goal is the probandum.

There are of course various ways you can do this. In effect it is wrong that I show you how it should be done for group think is first required. But still:

When you take the GNP of a country take half of that and say everyone joins in as a voluntary civil servant. You make ten levels around these four. Jail, bankrupt, basic income that no one should remain in for any longer period of time, then every time a quanta more M lock, Commuter, IC, TGV, then Dr, Prof and ultimately laureate level. In effect it is what we Dutch already know as the Balkenende norm that no civil servant is allowed to earn more than the PM.

It is in everybody's interest that say > 90% of TGV's reach the highest forms of education. I.e. become neurologists etc. Well then when they know that if they behave and play along that is guaranteed then everybody is happy. With 20% open to completion say lawyers compete with lawyers you have sufficient pressure to do your best. Shame and guilt are all part of what is written in the algorithms of the brain.

For all small businesses and companies schools and what not the cost of labor has if need be fully gone. Internet killing small shops will thus no longer be a problem. Half the income could be in the form of a claw back via insurances on lawyers dentists and other things like housing. You may chose in a democratically to be decided min-max way. For instance in part to consume less and have the money destroyed. (Don't bore me with the details problem.)

For the rich and mighty it is win-win as well, for the fear of you or your family being kidnaped will be gone. The trick here is to dived wealth and income into private wealth and income say in the Netherlands € 120000 a year maximum for a couple thus twice that amount. And maximum private wealth € 24 million. Corporate wealth of a privately owned firm say Lamborghini signore Lamborghini is the boss and stays the boss deciding not to build tractors yet sports cars. His wealth in the firm works as an insurance. His house of a million burns down by accident than he can pay 1 million taxes and put a million in his private income.

The basic thing is that the DNA of us humans want or will go mad either per group: 10% freedom of thought, 10% freedom of relationship (these the open minded 20 % thus minority that should be given a voice) ; 20% respect (authoritarian types); 60% want security / certainty. So there it is money can indeed buy that.

In order to do this the Senates of the world must be made to change into a different sort of representation advisory body in permanent senate hearing behind closed doors. R&D must always be done behind closed doors. They can quickly in the Netherlands do this as a test to become senators for life if the test succeeds. No longer a lawmaking body but an advisory body of part timers with boots in the dirt. All personality types also marshaling locks still doing cleaning jobs but with laureate level income are the neural network of the senate talking also to the senates of the world. Already payed for remember so five companies of two hundred in the five areas that are needed. Shift every so often. Every year 10 twenty two year old woman and 10 same age men become apprentice senators for life. An advisory body to anyone that wisdom requires, that are very much in the know. Like the Greeks knew you need an Oracle. The reason is we simply can't understand each other. It is done via hypnotic HRM marketing, advertising and HRM/Sales is in our DNA. Hypnotics is a survival trait.

The 50% + 1 vote system is for dealing with inherent group interests. And is therefore balanced out. For when the oracle speaks......

Well then the other half of the GNP is for grabs. I predict a normal distribution will ensue of wealth and income with more millionaires even under marshalling locks and no poor. This no war.

Well you would need to study the site. Yet as a brain game. When the A 4 of the block model goes viral it will already be a run race. Like E=mc2 even if you don't understand, just say you do. In itself a brain game.

Regards Gerhard

Dear Steve,

An after diner ad on, the more fundamental change to the entire system then would be that the wise judge doesn't have loopholes in the law on important issues. This can only be done when the legal system is organized correctly. It will also work with a jury system. Just get the jury chosen via the block model as well. And the choice for trial by judge or jury should not be one of plea bargaining. The block model shows that you must have the right to a double trial. It will in effect always lead to the choice of trial by judge for the outcome will be the same yet the time of the court case is much shorter.

The fundamental problem at the moment is that people without irony yet with logic have "magic" gains and vice versa people with no logic yet irony have those gains like "magic" as well. Yet it invariably leads to an Dr Ingo Piepers scenario, of war that can only be stopped by changing this consistent with Bayes and the Block model.

The testing is required to gain the needed trust of the rich and wealthy.

Even the Romans and the colonial powers knew that you must never threaten the powers that be as long as they play along. They will for it is a hypnotic brain game. Just learn to turn the tables. Like white magic is stronger than black magic for requires more skill at the game. Magic being in effect a paradox that part of humanity imply can't really understand the others other than via religious validated blind trust in the team mates.

When the courts are in order with the resounding voices needed to be reached consensus with it is game over for foul play.

Only then can you effectively change the tax laws. For all extra you earn above the norm you pay 50% tax up to the maximum. Then 100%. The more tax you pay the slower you decline when the GNP drops. And in the Netherlands you get a lunch with the King and are held in high esteem. That is what authoritarian types crave the most i.e. not many yet esteem.

Nowhere to run nowhere to hide. Even trying tax evasion you will be caught. Taxing success in a clever way never hurts. Yet you need evidence and proof in order. The law is not at fault so changing the law all the time shifts focus g=from the real problem. Incorrect teaming due to incorrect religion of what mankind is.

In order not to kill the hen with the golden eggs instead of paying taxes an independent participation firm can join in safe guarding the interests of the community. As long as dividend is paid no problem. The say in the company stays with Lamborghini.

So the community shares in the rise in the worth of the enterprise and too much profit say > 10%. No risk for labor costs other than the extra you need to pay to compete on labor as a firm.

No more slavery for you can simply without going bankrupt say no when as a Christian Jesus had he lived now would of advised you to say no. No slavery thus.

People will I predict start working with their younger clones in order to take days off. Etc. Much much more to be said. Like explaining all chess. Yet this block model is 64 times more complex than that and only part of the story with the ant and reptile brain also at play. And a model is just a model not reality.

Regards Gerhard

Dear Mr Ris, thanks for developing ,We shall answer you soon, and Ulla Mattfolk, my collaborator is going to read quietly also, best regards

7 days later

the solutions exist , it is sure and certain , it is not an utopy, this UN must be responsible and listen the scientists deterministic and universal having global solutions where all wins, I know that all we are obliged to follow this system non really balanced, and that the majority have many occupations implying that they are not interested or that they have not a lot of time to follow this kind of project, I find this sad, more the vanity , so it is not easy to unify in a world divided and odd generally, now the people need money to be conviced or to follow systems already strong having power, but I will not stop, I want really humbly change this planet in finding the points of equilibrium where all lifes win, the richest like the poorest and all vegetals and anaimals, we can do it, yes it is possible, we can, we must just convice this UN to adapt this global system with rational solutions in all centers of interests, we just adapt the system and improve it , I need the help of people, because alone of course I cannot success, If we success it will be the bigest revolution on this earth of all times, me I want well but instead to try to explain this consciousness, it is better to utilise it with the sciences, I repeat but we can improve the economy, the ecology, the technologies, the industrialisations, and so many things with concrete solutions, and this UN must understand that it is an obliged step of evolution, when I speak about these wheels in orbit , it is important, we can create ecosystems inside and check this gravitation with the rotation , but for this we need money, and the world bank must listen this UN , that will give jobs to majority , it is just an energy this money and it lacks money and responsible universalists in the leaderships, it is not complicated, if we make this, we shall improve naturally the global odd psychology because people need simply to win more money to live better , and these jobs created due to these wheels in space can solve this , we must give hope, water, food, energy, jobs to majority and this actual global system cannot make this. Furthermore we destroy globally our ecosystems, is it a hidden camera??? because if yes it is time to tell us, me I want well but this UN is not skilling at this moment , I don t know what they do , if they are just politicians but they must listen the scientists concrete and universal because in the future and it is soon, them also they shall loose all , I know that a few number on this earth are real universal altruists, and that even at this UN there are problems , but they must encircle that if it is this or all we loose soon, the richest shall win still more and the pooret them shall boost this global economical system with what I explain but my 3 main solutions need to add other solutions also , that is why I need the skillings of universal scientists seeing the generality, I am not better you know , I just don t understand how it is possible that we have this globality knowing our potential, we have oddly evolved and we make the same errors than our ancestors, we must change for the well of all I repeat , please help me, I cannot do it alone me, I am not a magician.

of course, these wheels in space are a complex engineering project and for this we need funds and a decision of the UN , the NASA has well worked with their space station but they need funds to go farer , the space station is not sufficient, these wheels can be a reality if we take our global responsabilities, the best engineers can focus on this, it is really a necessary step of evolution for humanity and this earth. The orbits can be studied correctly and all the intrinsic systems in engineering, it si not a probleM, we just need funds and a global decision of this UN. That will solve really many things seen the jobs manual and others correlated. I speak really about wheels very complex and detailed and big, not small diameters, we must create enormous system and all must be taken into account, even the security of course and the long term resistance. Mars is not a solution due to several problems like the gravitation and so problems about the daptation of lifes animal and vegetal.more others, but we can utilise it at short term for ressources or others like experiments. Elon Musk works well but he needs help also to go farer in the researchs and projects, in fact we must help all the visionary projects and leaders. It is not an utopy I repeat but an obliged step of evolution permiting to catalyse all on earth also in economy, ecology, technology.... When we analyse the problem of these wheels, it is just a problem of funds and responsabilities of governments, so the UN , we have too much divided systems instead to work together for the common well. Imagine this incredible revolution in making these wheels and others industrialisation of our solar systems, the economy must be adapted, we know all that we go in the wall in the future and that this planet and its actual global system is not sufficient. The UN has persons enlightened and responsible, so they must take their responsabilities and forget the persons finding a problem for the most simple solutions general due to their vanity, they shall not help this planet, they implies problems instead to find these solutions for the well of all. We know that the jealousy, the vanity, the lack of consciousness, the stupidity exists and we must not work with this , but work with the real universal altruists understanding this universe and having solutions concrete.The others finding problems, they can make their lifes in satisfying their ego and vanity, it is not our problem. We can do it, and I d say, we must do it, we are obliged to do it.

    Dear Steve,

    Indeed as you say it is possible to fundamentally change things for the better.

    Indeed, no one can do this alone. It needs a mass movement, that requires a team to get that started.

    Yet, every individual should also take mental care of him or herself whilst attempting such a venture. It is akin fighting a safe just war against poverty, due to injustice being the root cause of war.

    Warriors need to rest and take time to think. I gather you are French(?) so then general Joffre springs to mind, of which the book Guns of August by Barbara Tuchman is a recommended read. President Kennedy had a copy of that book on his desk during the Cuban Missile crises, in order not to blunder in to a WW III. Anyway, Joffre according to Tuchman, let himself be driven along the front, yet always took time to have a decent lunch. Some of us are gifted with the talent to see further into the future than others and have difficulty to communicate this, or to be more precise get the message across.

    Being forced into small talk by your partner was an important old school thing my uncle a psychiatrist head of a large psychiatric hospital had told my dad. You need time to switch off.

    Wikipedia on William Tecumseh Sherman: "Although his brother, Congressman John Sherman, was well known for his anti-slavery views, Captain Sherman was not an abolitionist and he had expressed some sympathy for the white Southerners' defense of their agrarian system, including the institution of slavery. On the other hand, Sherman was adamantly opposed to secession. In Louisiana he became a close friend of Professor David F. Boyd, a native of Virginia and an enthusiastic secessionist. Boyd later recalled witnessing that, when news of South Carolina's secession from the United States reached them at the Seminary, "Sherman burst out crying, and began, in his nervous way, pacing the floor and deprecating the step which he feared might bring destruction on the whole country."[30] In what some authors have seen as an accurate prophecy of the conflict that would engulf the United States during the next four years,[31] Boyd recalled Sherman declaring:

    You people of the South don't know what you are doing. This country will be drenched in blood, and God only knows how it will end. It is all folly, madness, a crime against civilization! You people speak so lightly of war; you don't know what you're talking about. War is a terrible thing! You mistake, too, the people of the North. They are a peaceable people but an earnest people, and they will fight, too. They are not going to let this country be destroyed without a mighty effort to save it... Besides, where are your men and appliances of war to contend against them? The North can make a steam engine, locomotive, or railway car; hardly a yard of cloth or pair of shoes can you make. You are rushing into war with one of the most powerful, ingeniously mechanical, and determined people on Earth--right at your doors. You are bound to fail. Only in your spirit and determination are you prepared for war. In all else you are totally unprepared, with a bad cause to start with. At first you will make headway, but as your limited resources begin to fail, shut out from the markets of Europe as you will be, your cause will begin to wane. If your people will but stop and think, they must see in the end that you will surely fail.[32]"

    This history of the US Civil war shows what the Romans and colonial powers also knew: when you endanger a way of prosperous living such as via abolition of slavery, it will go suicidal. We Dutch as a colonial power kept the Sultans in power for that very reason. A brain game that keeps the powerful in power, yet forces them to cooperate. No way of rational warning will be heeded, not even by a secessionist professor, even a friend such as Sherman.

    The reason Sherman sensed that the North would fight, has been very well shown in a 4 minute film I can't at the moment find: the gest of it was that most immigrants had for the first time the right to vote. Seeing the Union and thus democracy being endangered by succession due to the election of Lincoln being perceived by the South as an abolitionist, even by people such as Sherman who weren't abolitionists would make them fight for that reason. It led to a nervous breakdown of Sherman, knowing as well that he would have to fight his classmates of WestPoint. And he indeed made Georgia howl.

    Yet an important other lesson looms namely that of course slavery is a condition sine qua non for the Civil War. The USA is as I'm writing this again at the brink of civil war, due to slavery. Namely not everyone having the fundamental human right to play along for a guaranteed decent income. The root cause.

    Most people will only follow authority. It is in our DNA as a survival trait. As you already pointed out as well.

    I befriended then prof Richard Gill due to the murder case Lucia de B. A nurse convicted of multiple murders. It was thanks to Richards contact via KNAW that Nobel prize laureate Gerard 't Hooft wrote a short open letter in the newspaper. That was what made the supreme court shift.

    The case was about Bayesian versus Empirical statistics and is more fundamental than they then knew.

    A new insight for me since last week is that it is even most fundamental.

    If you don't want to end up in a Science in Transition bog down, then a decent systematic search for the truth, science will need to redefine in a Bayesian way into: idea, concept with a painted picture in a testable way, the proof thereof (i.e. a proven prime suspect); theory (a concept with the algebra formulas) and a law such as the theories of Einstein should be seen. Yet in their respective boxes.

    According to my model the pure mathematical formula of Pierre Laplace taken in the interpretation of Thomas Bayes is an already proven most fundamental law of the cosmos/ nature/ god. Taking all three these words as absolutely identical and thus have consistency i.e. no conflict.

    The synapse of our brain is consistent with the cosmos, and it works both deterministic as well as probabilistic. It thus also shows us what the cosmos must be like. Inconsistency with Bayes means pseudoscientific per logical definition. It shows you proper legal proceeding in a very practical way. It is not trivial. It can prevent wars.

    It also shows via the Block Model that was found via this Bayesian approach that without Martinus Veltman, Gerard 't Hooft wouldn't have had the Nobel prize and vice versa. Veltman has a clear resounding voice.

    The same goes for Sir Isaac Newton and Sir Robert Hooke seen by some as the Leonardo da Vinci of his day. Hooke had to shut up and calculate. Wrong: first paint the whole picture in a testable way. Like Einstein did, knowing he was wrong.

    And the same goes for Albert Einstein and his first wife who he needed for the algebra.

    The last weeks I've formed a little team, that don't dispute the correctness of my model on their respective areas of expertise, now see if I can bag a big fish (with some help maybe?).

    Again I have a beginning of successful tests, hilariously on a private Facebook where an intelligent person objecting to my claim that some people don't have irony tried to use irony, not grasping that correct use of witty irony is more than just state the opposite of what you mean and call that irony. In so doing obviously proving the opposite and having that still to be seen by anyone who does have irony that the attempted falsification not only failed but added stronger proof (/evidence for those not yet convinced) to the contrary.

    The situation is dire people. We are on the brink of WWIII.

    Yet even so: Carpe Diem! & Savoir Vivre! (Pardon me my French пЃЉ)

    We're learning quite a bit from the Democrats. If you take away people's jobs, they riot and tear up your city. If you give people jobs and keep them employed, they don't have time to protests. If you defund the police, crime and murder rates go up. If you train police that they are the blue line that separates their country from anarchy, they will be more patient. If you teach citizens to treat the police with respect, there will be less need for arrests.

    Democrats will not agree with me, but the truth is: only Democrat cities are burning and are overrun with anarchists and crime.

    Dear Jason Mark,

    Could it be that both Democrats and Republicans are fundamentally wrong?

    Having people having multiple jobs just being able to get by is slavery and invariably will lead to conflicts in the long run. It simply can't work that 1% gets most of the wealth. It will always fail. A mathematical human psychics affair.

    On the other hand Keynes will lead to government spending spiraling out of control. That won't work either.

    Regards Gerhard

    Gerhard,

    You claim that "both" are wrong! But here is the flaw in your thinking. People have to work, either in industry, corporate world, or do something that keeps them busy. Even if they are donating their time to a charity or helping to raise kids.

    I don't know where you got the idea it was okay to tax excessively the working class. It's like you don't understand that socialism is slavery.

    I remember a time when I wasn't making the money I wanted. I took the opportunity to join the US Army and serve my country. I know you have been brainwashed to hate the military. If so, you should reconsider your views. Freedom is not free. Peace only comes to those who are prepared for war.

    Did you know that 92% of jobs come from people who are so rich, that they have to find workers to work at their factories and in their offices? Rich people give other people jobs. You should hate them less for it.

    Hello to both of you, Mr Ris, yes I am frecnh speaking, that is why my english and grammar are not perfect, sorry for this, I liked a lot your post, I think like you , it is not easy to make understaning to people persuaded about the arms, weapons, borders , many think they are right about these arms, of course I know that we can reach a point of equilibrium with the theory off games and a kind of disuasion for these arms, because the strength if china, usa, europa , india for example work together, that will disuade the others tpo produce arms, so paradoxally that will decreqse these productions. I am aware that fortuannly the USA was there in europa during the WW2 , but the USA has a big problem considering the arms, it is a young country with a special past and they fear a lot and it is the country where we have the most numerous number of death due to arms. Jason is a republican petriot persuaded that they are are right, I am tolerant but I find odd sometimes to love this , and it is linked to fear also and catholicism, I don t understand this. I love USA but there is a problem like everywhere on earth simply, no country is perfect after all. I see also that in this country the USA the racism and the differences are a main problem, it is odd , I have the same problem in belgium due to immigration, the world changes and the UN is not able to find the adapted solutions, the future is to create a global village harmonised for all, that is why the patriotism is not the solution, even if they are persuaded. Kennedy was a person seeing clear and it is sad he has been shot because he jhas simply told truths like many , it exists things we cannot critic unfortunally.

    Dear Jason, the republicans or democrats are not the problem, the problem is the lack of consciousness in all governances respecting the universal laws and the pure altruism, with or without our approvements, if we success to survive, the borders, the arms and money are dedictated to disappear, because it exists things wich cannot be divided or selt simply. I know you a catholic republican patriot , and I respect your choice, but be aware that we evolve towards an universal unification also , it lacks many things in all the different political ideologies and it is mainly this universalism wich lacks.

    The socialism, the communism, the capitalism are not the solutiobns but an equilibrium between them with a pure universalism, yes

    Dear Jason Mark,

    Do please read more carefully what it is that I state: More Millionaires, No Poor, No War.

    So, I'm quite opposed to socialism.

    The root cause is somewhat more a problem. Namely that we humans are something different than our current paradigm makes us believe we are. We are all idiots - so am I, that need groupthink in order to think properly. Group think is not socialism, lest you think that. You can also do that in any organization, family or church if you like.

    You would be astonished how little focus we individual humans have. A thing that illusionists and hypnotizers know and exploit.

    40% of humanity even the 10% of the most intelligent thereof simply can't compute long term problems. 80% female thus 20% male.

    A further 40% of humanity simply can't compute further than medium term affairs: 80% male and 20% female. Including the 10% most intelligent thereof.

    Only 20% can think in more long terms on important issues. 50% male / 50% female. On far above average complex problems that leaves us (10% of this group thus) 2% that can dream up correct potential testable solutions in order not to let it spiral out of control.

    Less than 1% deviation over the total.

    You can learn to spot this as being true yourself B.T.W.

    Alas the survival trait of internalized hypnotics that I also define as religion, comes to play. And then only a person seen as the authority can change the religion of the peer group without it becoming an open conflict.

    If you are religious in this belief you state it is as if I were to state like Sherman, that I pointed out earlier saying to a toddler (that we all are thus, including myself) go ahead walk on the Duckweed of the pond, commit suicide with H2O. The toddler will hear "go ahead walk onto the strange pond, blah, blah unimportant." And thus walk onto the pond, and get wet and maybe drown.

    So if you are indeed religious in this issue, then there is no way I can convince you to rethink this.

    So then we'd best agree to disagree.

    Unless you can prove that we aren't prof Dick Swaab type of robots and that hypnotism and religion aren't survival traits.

    Oh, and by the way, I've been in the army and proudly so. And my grandparents were in the armed resistance in the war. I've been a D.A.. So I don't quite know where you got these ideas from? That Sherman was vehemently opposed to war, made him in your eyes I guess then a pacifist?

    Regards, Gerhard

    Mr Ris, happy to know you, you are a real universalist understanding the pure laws of this universe, I have remarked that it is difficult to change the adult humans, they are persuaded that they are right, like all. My project becomes very complex to solve seeing the human psychology unfortunally. It is a fact, that is why I prefer to work the globality and the basis in imporving the quality of lifes everywhere instead to try to change the thoughts of humans, it seems not possible unfortunally. A few number understand this universal altruism and that we are here to utilise our consciousness converging with this universe to optimise what we can optimise with this sciences and consciousness. It seems difficult for many to encricle that we are all humans brothers in the same boat and that we must change , the borders are stupid, the arms also and this money also, but we are obliged to make with these parameters unfortunally actually, that is why I try to find global solutions of harmonisations where all wins

    Dear Steve,

    Do please call me Gerhard. And thank you.

    I think we are of the same mind set in order to get this shit we are heading for sorted out.

    We need someone of authority to get that started. I see no other way.

    Gerhard

    Dear Jason, Mr Ris is not for the socialism, he just explains that we can harmonise both, the liberalism and the socialism can be modern political systems respecting the universal altruism, I am against the exterme socialism or the extreme capitalism, but an equilibrium between both with this universalism can be a good solution global, it is always a question of consciousness in the governances in fact, the keys must be simply given in good hands, in belgium my country the cpountry is divided in two parts, the flemmish and the walloons, and we are without governments since many years and the flemmish wants to divide the country, in wallonia the socialist party has helped in the past a lot but now they are a problem and I can affirm that the psychology of belgians in this part is odd, the socialism indeed can imply serious problems, so I insist about the equilibrium between both, we have in belgium the best social security on this planet and it is well for several reasons but it is not well for other reasons, your country needs a better social security for the forgotten and my country needs a better capitalism conscious for the enterprises simply, it seems good solutions everywhere on this planet, a kind of harmonised capitalism socialism moder universal simply where the consciousness is the main chief orchestra in the governances, it seems evident to reach the points of equilibrium. For this, we need funds, a new revolutionary industrialisation and better governances and better checkings of enteprises without consciousness.

    :) thanks Gerhard, I agree indeed, we need help and a good authority to reach these aims, hope this group can success in unifying the good persons and in creating a manifest of concrete deterministic universal solutions where all wins. I beleive we can arrive but it needs time to be credible. I d like to have celebrities to help us , but they need opportunity I beleive , it is the begining and I thank FQXi to have created this group. I have remarked in all humility that the win win adapted to this actual global system seems the most important. What you told about the mantal health is so so important, this psychology is linked and like Ulla told me, the choas is increased if we don t improve this.

    :) Indeed it is already spiraling out of control.

    What I forgot to state was my new insight from a few days ago:

    The formula of Bayes is more than just already part of the Theory of Everything it is already part of the Laws of Everything.

    A simple all mathematics and logic encompassing Socratic Yin & Yang seeming Harry Potter formula that shows that the universe must fundamentally be deterministic yet only presents itself as probabilistic.

    It also is thus the fundamental law for Human Rights and evidence and proof in the courtrooms and tax laws. Very simple like a game of chess to learn the basics.

    The Romans were clever. They said, give food and entertainment to the people so they keep calm. Still the Roman Impere was destroyed.... we are never alone, Jason. US is not alone either, if you happen to think so...

    Much work would be better undone. The right hand should know what the left hand does, they should be synchronized.

    How big is the US export of weapons, and what could be done in a better way to serve the whole?

    Ulla.

    Gerhard, I present you a relevant general universalist skilling, Mrs Mattfolk :) she knows a lot

    Gerhard,

    I think we are of the same mind set in order to get this shit we are heading for sorted out.

    We need someone of authority to get that started. I see no other way.

    The FQXI is a good starter. Are you some authority? We need to create something attracting good thinkers, and then also celebrities... Also money is no enemy, just a tool to make things possible. What do we use that tool to do? Is the way it works in synch with the whole?

    Ulla.